Homelessness and the Meaning the meaning the light the meaning ... - PDF document

Homelessness and the Meaning the meaning the light the meaning milieu of on the street became a street people of home more experienced (Randall, 1988; Lonsdale, mean that they believe that they what they would home). Watson commonly distinguish may not current experience, and the reality of they may therefore wrong to suggest that the an ‘experiential agenda’ feelings and and intellectual a sense of home have no memory of right, however, about home being because the distinction people make ideal and home as experienced actuality is itself socially constructed through We cannot know what home ‘really’ of these Watson and Austerberry revealed a number decent material conditions and emotional and physical well- relations, control and privacy, and simply 1986: 93-7). their respondents defined homelessness lack of emotional and lack of social and privacy, and simply rooflessness (ibid., 1986: 97- Interestingly, Watson found that who did consider their accommodation to their home did homeless, while women who considered their present accommodation to 92). These contradictions (having but not a home but homeless) the researchers of respondents’ adoption of the minimal the first but not of the second contradiction (that having a 103). Such research serves to of meaning home and homelessness, which will in the fourth section of what has been about the meaning of sense’ definitions homelessness can inadequate. Official definitions minimal, such the 1977 (Homeless Persons) Act (now the Housing known ‘common sense’ definition is that found of a right access to their own secure and dimensions of the meaning of lack of control privacy, and poor material conditions. aspects of homelessness, which could (following entirely neglected such an to a problem which is merely technical (for shortages) and citizenship rights). Current explanations Homelessness, like home, is therefore all to dismiss defective. Homelessness is ideologically the absence of home and therefore derivative from the ideological construction home, then, the construction both logic and emotion. People distinguish between the absence of ‘real (ironically meaning a failure labour, profits, interest the bases for proletarians, capitalists, financiers landlords, respectively). Today, such the ‘criminal state provision for their survival. has suggested dependent on as ‘breadwinners’. homeless people of an the Weberian the marxist distinct forms The ‘underclass’ a class, the term ‘underclass’ explains nothing, and marxist the context poverty, propertylessness powerlessness, as markets. The theoretical analysis involved, however, appears to deal and not with the specifics homelessness itself. ignore certain dimensions a failure to grasp state causes contrast, a more satisfactory housing market state policies Homelessness, like home, want it mean. It should to analyse have attempted to do this provisional way, emphasized too strongly that this is intended purely as a conceptual clarification, stimulate debate and help to guide future Considerable further empirical investigation is to test validity and utility of this Home can at least six shelter, hearth, heart, privacy, roots, abode and (possibly) paradise. signifiers can its wider symbolic a specific sense relating to oneself and to others. The the signifiers empirical findings example, ‘shelter’ corresponds ‘material conditions’, ‘hearth’ corresponds to and physical to ‘loving caring social relations’, ‘privacy’ Two signifiers these, however, corresponds to individual identity) and distinct from the everyday life). these signifiers comprise the affords protection to oneself, appears to others as at least a one’s head. connotes the which home the body, one to relax ensuring a welcoming and atmosphere for others. is very case the emphasis emotional rather than physiological security happy home a stable home, based involves the power to ‘control one’s boundaries’ (Ryan, a certain territory the power to exclude other persons from and to prohibit surveillance the territory other persons. Homelessness and the meaning and Roberts, that home different meaning women than This difference the nature of domestic work, something done out of love instead where the heart is, means unpaid and labour for women, whereas for emotional stability and domestic love and profound, surveys of home have sophisticated enough be capable of identifying means misery women, for misery will take of emotional deprivation, whereas for will mean the loss of their domestic role, a of domestic unemployment be much for them (for instance, they have no A second resource distribution (Brannen and Wilson, literature indicates that men the household’s while women them. The a territorial possession rather different men. One expect that men and property stress the facts of exclusive possession, users’ rights the implications day-to-day discharge domestic responsibilities; this expectation needs be explored and through further although homelessness means lack of privacy and dispossession men and it seems more propertylessness, whereas likely to mean the of everyday routines. Again, this could mean that more serious One further example should suffice for the purposes of this violence’ is refer to assaults against their wives (Smith, 1989). such violence of home and emotional security? that ‘domestic violence’ is an inappropriate expression. follow a typical pattern (Dobash and 1980): they inside the home (Roy, 1982), the assailant nearly always a man and the victim a woman (Smith, 1989), and the relationship between always marital speaking, therefore, this is not a but a problem of ‘violent wives having positive attachment to their home. Indeed, this part of the reason why battered wives not easily give up homes in violence, although test such a possible, therefore, that the meaning of significantly different for battered women the meaning the experience of battered women time goes unless the assailant can successfully excluded the home, homelessness this respect they can provide the essential ‘safe can rarely restore the wider experience of home have lost. The wider home and homelessness: social and homelessness their context is therefore initially a matter of showing how the meanings of and homelessness relate to features of in which status, tenure, domestic relations reproduction, and In a sense, however, world presents a list of explanation, then, to demonstrate homelessness to immediate contexts. Relationships considered this paper cultural status and housing tenure, of types of domestic parent-child relations; affective relations household members; is now these contextual relations final task embeddedness of and homelessness systems of social relations, to the roots of the processes of construction. Explanation level identifies home and preliminary analysis indicates that class organization, when expressed through (involving, for state centralization, policy residualization determining the further development and of class theory be the new sociology of housing. Surveying, University College Salford, Street Annexe, Salford Routledge and and homeless: participant observation study Working Paper the Environment, definition and measurement and the London housing Advanced Urban Studies, University resource distribution. Hyman, London. Beyond the Open University Kemp and Smith (1990) and social Macmillan, London. Dahrendorf, R. The erosion citizenship and its consequences New Statesman, (1989) Human nature, society and the home. Housing Studies Urban sociology: Harvester Wheatsheaf, Dobash, R. and R. Dobash (1980) Violence against Open Books, Shepton Mallet. (1989) Fifteen years homelessness in the UK. and identity: cross-cultural Croom Helm, London. class couples. Allen and Unwin, London. meaning of home owner-occupation: towards Working Paper Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol. Being and Macquarrie and Robinson. Blackwell, Oxford. Jowell, R. and R. Topf (1988) British social attitudes: D. and Speakman (1986) Women and E. Open University Milton Keynes. (1990) Cold comfort 23 December, and A. Macmillan, London. H. Newby, Rose and Vogler (1988) modem Britain. Roberts (1984) a lifetimeperspectixe. HMSO, London. K. and Engels (1968) Lawrence and