/
Implementing the deepened structural modeling approach: Implementing the deepened structural modeling approach:

Implementing the deepened structural modeling approach: - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
371 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-19

Implementing the deepened structural modeling approach: - PPT Presentation

The sGAIN energy model Stefan Schleicher Christian Hofer 4 March 2015 ClimTrans2050 We demonstrate the implementation of the envisaged deepened structural modeling approach with a fullscale and operational model for Austria ID: 656929

final energy emissions functionalities energy final functionalities emissions gross step transformation modeling temperature productivity consumption gfe mix untransformed distribution

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Implementing the deepened structural mod..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Implementing thedeepened structural modeling approach:The sGAIN energy model

Stefan SchleicherChristian Hofer4 March 2015

ClimTrans2050Slide2

We demonstrate the implementation of the envisaged deepened structural modeling approach with a full-scale and operational model for Austria

The parameters were chosen to achieve a 80 percent reduction of energetic CO2 emissions by 2050Slide3

How to develop a modeling frameworkfor the transition to low-energy and low-carbon structures?Slide4

The focus of analysis is on energy related functionalities, not on energy flows.

Parameters should be easily understood

as to their impacts.

Increasing energy productivity or changing the energy mix can be evaluated as to investment and operating effects.

This is in sharp contrast, e.g., to elasticities of substitution.

Instead of pretending predictable outcomes we offer insights how certain targets as emission reductions could be achieved by matching structural changes.Additional modeling layers deal with the interaction of other sectors of the economy and market and non-market driven incentives and institutional setups.

Some Design PrinciplesSlide5

Step 1Functionalities and useful energy productivitySlide6

Functionalities, Useful Energy ProductivitySlide7

Step 2Energy mix of useful energySlide8

Energy mix of Useful EnergySlide9

Functionalities and Useful Energy

Low temperature heat

High temperature heat

Stationary engines

Mobile engines

Lighting and electronics

Final Energy Consumption + Non-energetic energy consumption =

=

Net Final Energy Consumption

Functionality / Useful Energy Productivity =

= Useful Final EnergySlide10

Step 3Losses from distribution and own useSlide11

Distribution Losses and Gross Final Energy

Net Final Energy Consumption + Distribution Losses =

= Gross Final Energy Slide12

Step 5Distributing gross final energyinto transformed and untransformed final energySlide13

Untransformed and transformedGross Final Energy

Gross

Final

Energy (GFE) =

Transformed GFE + Untransformed GFE Slide14

Step 6Losses from energy transformationinto electricity and heatand other transformationsSlide15

Transformation of ElectricitySlide16

Transformation of HeatSlide17

Transformation LossesSlide18

Gross Energy SupplySlide19

The overall picture of a low-energy and low-carbon energy transformationSlide20

Functionalities, Useful Energy, and CO2 EmissionsSlide21

CO2 EmissionsSlide22

In view of radical emissions reductions, it is easer to increase energy efficiency than to expand massively renewables.

For a 80% reduction target the key issues are low-temperature functionalities of buildings and a major re-design of the functionalities related to mobility.

T

he remaining emissions reductions will hinge upon the options for the high-temperature functionalities.

Some Conclusions