/
Meta-analysis of reef fish data in Hawaii to examine natura Meta-analysis of reef fish data in Hawaii to examine natura

Meta-analysis of reef fish data in Hawaii to examine natura - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
404 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-19

Meta-analysis of reef fish data in Hawaii to examine natura - PPT Presentation

Alan Friedlander 1 Mary Donovan 1 Kosta Stamoulis 1 Ivor Williams 2 1 Fisheries Ecology Research Lab Univ Hawaii 2 CRED PIFSC NOAA Outline amp Products Data collection and breadth ID: 539298

biomass fish hawaii amp fish biomass amp hawaii species nwhi assemblages friedlander endemism occurrence eoo mhi lanai hawaiian maui

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Meta-analysis of reef fish data in Hawai..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Meta-analysis of reef fish data in Hawaii to examine natural and anthropogenic processes

Alan Friedlander

1, Mary Donovan1,Kosta Stamoulis1, Ivor Williams2, 1Fisheries Ecology Research Lab, Univ. Hawaii2CRED, PIFSC, NOAASlide2

Outline & ProductsData collection and breadth

Length-weight relationshipsSpatial and temporal comparisonBio-regionalizationAssemblage structureEndemism

Human ImpactsGradientsSpatial analysisModeling driversComparison of methodsModeling fish assemblages across biogeographic & anthropogenic gradientsSlide3

Length-weight Parameters for Hawaiian Reef FishesPublished for the first time

112 species total33 Hawaiian EndemicsSubset Species used in temporal and regional comparisonsLarge differences when compared to known values from other regionsSlide4

Program

Contributor

Year rangeGeographic coverageMethodNNOAA RAMP CRED

Williams

2000-2012

NWHI and MHI

Belt

< 2008

, SPC

2008

7845

TNC

Conklin

2008-2012

StatewideBelt814DAR - KonaWalsh1999-2012West HawaiiBelt10240DAR - MauiSparksMauiBeltDAR - OahuSchumacherOahuBeltNational Park ServiceBrown, Friedlander, Beets2008-2012Kalaupapa, Kaloko, Honaunau, PuukoholaBelt501FHUS (NOAA Biogeography)Friedlander, Brown, 2000-200412 MLCDs & adjacent areas statewideBelt2021FHUS (NOAA Biogeography)Friedlander, Wedding2004-08Pupukea, Honolua, Kealakekua, HanaumaBeltFERLFriedlander1992-2012HanaleiBelt120FERLFriedlander2010, 2012Oahu, Lanai, KauaiBelt542CRAMPRodgers, Brown, Friedlander1998-2012StatewideBelt380TOTAL22463

Fish Survey DatasetsSlide5

Number of fish surveys by Island Slide6

Archipelago-level survey effort

Williams et al. 2008

This Study6005655752340

266

571

32

133

908

60

644

239

535

1070

2508

1032752678Slide7

BiogregionalizationAssemblages vary between NWHI and MHI

Species composition varies along latitudinal gradientRelated to geographic extent of species distributionsLatitudinal correlations exist for a variety of species

Higher level of endemism in NWHISlide8

Biomass

Abundance

ANOSIM R: 0.57, p < 0.01ANOSIM R: 0.47, p < 0.01NihoaMolokaiMaroNiihauLaysan

Kahoolawe

Kauai

Oahu

Maui

Lanai

Hawaii

Kure

Lisianski

Necker

Midway

P&H

FFSNihoaMolokaiMaroNiihauLaysanKahoolaweKauaiOahuMauiLanaiHawaiiKureLisianskiNeckerMidwayP&HFFSMultidimensional examination of fish species assemblagesStress = 0.09Stress = 0.013 Assemblages distinct between MHI & NWHI Higher concordance using biomassSlide9

EOO = Extent of Occurrence

Measuring species’ range size

EOO = Extent of OccurrenceThe area encompassed by the minimum convex polygon of occurrenceSlide10

EOO (km

2

)

Prop of Density

Gradient of range size with LatitudeSlide11

Zoogeography with LatitudeSlide12

Endemic species

25% species endemic to Hawaii

Numerical endemism is 50% in NWHI compared to 20% in MHI

Higher endemism at the N end of chainSlide13

Human ImpactsGradient of fish biomass within the MHI

Large difference in total biomass comparing NWHI and MHIFish assemblages have high concordance with traditional Hawaiian management systemsComparison of MPAs across MHI Slide14
Slide15

Data Source: State of Hawaii Slide16

Boosted Regression Tree Analysis of Fish Biomass with

large-scale Habitat Variables

Relative % variance explainedSlide17

Fish Biomass Gradient by

Moku

and IslandSlide18

Fish Biomass and Human Population by MokuSlide19

Pali

Komohana (Maui)Kona (O‘ahu)Kaho‘olaweKo‘olau (Moloka‘i)Napali (Kaua‘i)Slide20

Fish biomass by Marine Protected areaSlide21

Comparison of fish biomass by protected status & islandSlide22

Mahalo

mdono@hawaii.edu