/
Over centuries, there were several Church Inquisitions Over centuries, there were several Church Inquisitions

Over centuries, there were several Church Inquisitions - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
393 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-14

Over centuries, there were several Church Inquisitions - PPT Presentation

throughout Europe BUT When modern people criticize the Catholic Church They generally mean the Spanish Inquisition The Spanish Inquisition The Good The Bad and The Ugly The Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition was established in 1478 by Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and ID: 318788

church inquisition catholic accused inquisition church accused catholic spanish defendant torture public spain convert monarchs guilty punishment condemned estimated

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Over centuries, there were several Churc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Over centuries, there were several Church Inquisitions

throughout Europe

BUT

When modern people criticize the Catholic Church

They generally mean the Spanish Inquisition.Slide2

The Spanish Inquisition

The Good, The Bad and The UglySlide3

The Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition was established in 1478 by Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile.

These are the monarchs who sponsored Christopher

Columbus

-

whose daughter, Catherine, marries Henry VIII of England.

It was intended to maintain Catholic orthodoxy in their kingdoms.

The Inquisition was to ensure that those who converted from Judaism and Islam were true believers. This regulation of the faith of the newly converted was intensified after the royal decrees issued in 1492 and 1501 ordering Jews and Muslims to convert or leave.Slide4

Various motives have been studied for the monarchs' decision to found an Inquisition apart from the Pope.

Don't think too hard about a motive. They were certainly (at least) looking for

M

uslims

. They had just ended a 780 year war against them to keep

Spain

, Spanish

.

And, it was better

for the accused

that an official “task force” look for them than nationalist vigilantes.

They

were also seeking a way to unite the separate kingdoms in Spain to be 'Spain'.Slide5

T

he Inquisition T

ribunal

Members

Varied in number- at least 5 or 6

men

2 Inquisitors (the leaders)

priests

who had university education

Secretary

Jailer

Torturer

Commissioner- often a commonerSlide6

The Possible Crimes

Heresy from a Catholic

This means a Protestant is a heretic.

False Jewish Convert

False Muslim Convert

Witchcraft

-

remember the

Salem Witches?

Sexual

Sin

-

remember the Scarlet Letter?Slide7

Process

> Preaching called the

The Period of Grace

-

you could repent and be taken out of the

Inquisition process.

>

Accusation

>

Detention

>

Inquisition

-

this is the part that may have included torture, of the defendant

and

the accuser. This happened in 2% of cases.

>

Sentencing

>

Auto-da-fe

-

public ceremony giving verdictsSlide8

A word about Torture…

The use of torture was a common practice in CIVIL law enforcement in Europe in the 1500’s. The Spanish Church did not invent it.

The Church limited it to 15 minutes and stated that it could not maim/injure you physically in a permanent way. Torture could only be used once. These guidelines were considered an ADVANCE on how the usual civil law enforcement use of torture was conducted. Could there have been abuses? Yes. Were they the norm? No.Slide9

Budget

Tribunals

paid themselves

from the confiscated goods of the guilty.

Taxing the People would have been a better choice

.

Why?Slide10

The Possible Sentences

The defendant could be acquitted.

The trial could be suspended, in which case the defendant, although under suspicion, went free.

The defendant could be reconciled to the Catholic Church.

The defendant could be penanced. He had to publicly abjure his crimes and accept a public punishment. Most were Church penances like fasting, attending Mass, making pilgrimages.

Among harsher penances were exile, fines or sentencing to service as oarsmen in royal galleys.

The condemned could receive a severe punishment. It's estimated this was 10% of the guilty. These were long sentences to jail or the galleys, confiscation of all property, whipping.Slide11

The most serious punishment was Relaxation. It's estimated this was 1% of the guilty.

This meant you were turned over to the government for burning at the stake. Execution was public.

If the condemned repented, they were shown mercy by being garroted before burning. If not, they were burned alive.Slide12

Pope

Sixtus

IV demanded

that control of the Spanish Inquisition be given to the Church

that the condemned be able to appeal to Rome

that the accused get

to have

lawyers

and know who accused them.

that the accused's enemies be disqualified as

witnessesSlide13

He was

denied on all but one count-

While the accused did not get to know who accused them, they were asked for a list of their known enemies.Slide14

How does this relate to our modern world?