ID: 821522
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Bioethical Perspectives on Incentivizing..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Bioethical Perspectives on Incentivizing
Bioethical Perspectives on Incentivizing Organ Donation and the Impact of NOTAI. Glenn Cohen, JDProfessor, Harvard Law SchoolDirector, Petrie-FlomCenter for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethicsigcohen@law.harvard.edu© 2016 ASTConflict of Interest DisclosureI have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.© 2016 ASTNOTA,
28 U.S.C. §274e(a)Prohibition It shall
28 U.S.C. §274e(a)Prohibition It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human organ for valuable consideration for use in human transplantation if the transfer affects interstate commerce. The preceding sentence does not apply with respect to human organ paired donation. (c) Definitions
(1)The term human organ means the huma
(1)The term human organ means the human (including fetal) kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, bone marrow, cornea, eye, bone, and skin or any subpart thereof and any other human organ (or any subpart thereof, including that derived from a fetus) specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services by regulation.(2) The term valuable
consideration does not include the rea
consideration does not include the reasonable payments associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, and storage of a human organ or the expenses of travel, housing, and lost wages incurred by the donor of a human organ in connection with the donation of the organ.Flynn v. Holder, 9
thCir. (2011) NOTA ok for peripheral bl
thCir. (2011) NOTA ok for peripheral blood stem cell derived from apheresis but not by aspiration© 2016 ASTBioethical ObjectionsCorruptionCrowding OutCoercionExploitationUndue InducementJustified Paternalism Unfair Organ DistributionAll slides after this drawn from: Cohen IG (2014)Regulating The Organ Market: Normative Foundation
s for Market Regulation. Law and Contemp
s for Market Regulation. Law and Contemporary Problems77(3):175-215© 2016 ASTPolling QuestionWhat (if anything) concerns you most about offering incentives for donating live or cadaverous organs?Corruption of the Value of the Human BodyCrowding Out -Reducing the Supply of Organs AvailableCoercion of DonorsExploitation of DonorsUndue
Inducement of DonorsDonors Will Make Po
Inducement of DonorsDonors Will Make Poor Decisions on Whether to Donate (Justified Paternalism)An Unfair Distribution of Organs will ResultNone of the Above, I am not Concerned© 2016 ASTPotential Regulatory Controls for IncentivesPrice ControlsRestrict Compensation FormRestrict Who Can Buy/SellRestrict What Kinds of Organs (i.e.,
Cadaveric vs. Live)Other (e.g., Waitin
Cadaveric vs. Live)Other (e.g., Waiting Periods, Choice Architecture/Nudge)© 2016 ASTMapping Objections to Controls© 2016 ASTMapping Objections to ControlsPrice ControlsRestrict Compensation FormRestrict Who Can Buy/SellRestrict What Kinds of Organs (i.e., Cadaveric vs. Live)Other (e.g., Waiting Periods, Choice Architecture/Nudg