18770428 ID: 825307
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 123 ( 2014 ) 380 388 1877-0428 © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of TTLC2013.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1436 ScienceDirectTTLC 2013
Comparative Study on Course Evaluatio
Comparative Study on Course Evaluation Process: Students and Lecturers Perceptions Nur Fadhlina Zainal Abedin, *, Hajah Makiah Tussaripah Jamil UiTM Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia Abstract Every semester, students are required to fill out lectu
rer evaluation forms, known as Student
rer evaluation forms, known as Student Feedback Online (SuFO). This evaluation is usually done at the end of each semester. It is used as a tool to measure teaching performance and improve the quality of teaching and learning. Many studies of students evaluation output ha
d been conducted. However, only a few of
d been conducted. However, only a few of studhad investigated students and lecturers perceptions of student evaluation process. To fill this research gap, this study attempts to determine lecturers and students perceptions in four aspects. Lecturers perceptions on stu
dents evaluation, students response
dents evaluation, students response about their evaluation, significance of SuFO evaluation to lecturers and students, and the differences between lecturers and students perceptions of the SuFO evaluation process are the four aspects to determine lecturers and studen
ts perception. The -semester student
ts perception. The -semester students from various programmes in UiTM Negeri Sembilan. Findings showed that there are no significant differences between students and lecturers perceptions on course evaluation process. Lecturers felt that students did evaluate them s
eriously. Student also agreed that they
eriously. Student also agreed that they had evaluated their lecturers seriously. Both lecturers and students considered the evaluation process important. Both lecturers and students also agreed that student evaluation process is used to improve teaching. © . Selecti
on and peer-review under responsibilit
on and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of TTLC2013. Keywords: Lecturers perception; Students evaluation; Quality of teaching * Corresponding author. Tel.: +0-606-4832195; fax: +0--4842449. E-mail address: jama
liah@ns.uitm.edu. Available online at
liah@ns.uitm.edu. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of TTLC2013.Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license