PPT-Improving Writing and Argumentation with NLP-Supported

Author : calandra-battersby | Published Date : 2017-05-02

Peer Review Diane Litman Professor Computer Science Department Senior Scientist Learning Research amp Development Center CoDirector Intelligent Systems

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Improving Writing and Argumentation with..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Improving Writing and Argumentation with NLP-Supported: Transcript


Peer Review Diane Litman Professor Computer Science Department Senior Scientist Learning Research amp Development Center CoDirector Intelligent Systems Program University of . References* 1. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. PLoS Medicine Volume 7 Issue 3 e1000251. 2. Update of the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Norma Dillard. Spartanburg Writing Project. June, 2014. >Roadblock. >Description. >3 practice activities. *political. *video. *DBQ. >. Goals. >Summation/Q&A. Agenda. I am constantly challenged to create new and innovative ways to enhance my students’ interest in topics related to Social Studies, and to help them enhance their abilities to formulate points of view using evidence and prior knowledge. A major portion of this task includes effective . Supported by:Improving Vending People generally want to be healthier environment. In Maricopa county, Wellness Works Program is offering to Vending Program?fat, sugar, sodium, and calories than usual to . Find the Argumentation . Bones. Every book has a skeleton hidden . between its . covers. Your job as an analytic reader is to find it.. X-ray the book to locate its arguments.. X-raying at three levels. about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11 (2012), 145 - 154. Ursula Wingate. King’s College London. Concepts of ‘argument’. Single claim: a . proposition is supported by grounds and . Middle & High . School Science. Victor . Sampson. Assistant . Professor of Science . Education . School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach. Florida State University. Patrick . Enderle. Assistant in Research. The mechanics of taking a firm stand aiming to persuade an audience. Arguments are Everywhere. Making an argument = expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence.. This is often the most important task of academic writing. Often, this is also an unstated expectation.. The “Argumentation . &. . Advocacy” Course in . GenEd. Carol Tutzauer. Center for Educational . Innovation. Frank . Tutzauer. Department of Communication. Universit. y. at Buffalo. The Standard . The Persuasive Essay. Argumentation/persuasion. Writing that attempts to convince the reader to agree with the writer’s point of view; to make a particular decision; to pursue a particular course of action. Social Context. Iyad Rahwan. Introduction. Argument takes place in a social context. Arguing with oneself vs. arguing with others. New challenges:. How does the audience evaluate arguments?. How do arguers strategize?. Math Science Partnership Grant. Tuesday, February 3, 2015. Where have we been??? . When we last left our superheroes… . SLIP OR TRIP . Argumentation in . ELA . vs. Mathematics. A Number Trick!. . Everyday Perspective. Interpersonal conflict=2 people engaged in verbal hostility. How do I win these arguments?. Debate=verbal competition. Collaboration=working out disagreements constructively. Cooperative knowledge seeking. to Argumentation Mining in Natural Language Text. Topic 2. 4/14/2014. Huy V. Nguyen. 1. Outline. Introduction to argumentation. Argumentation mining the problem. Argumentation v. discourse. Annotation and corpora. ARGUMENTATION METHODS OF ARGUMENT RECONSTRUCTION Douglas Walton CRRAR FMAR, Konstanz, Sept. 21, 2012 Argumentation Schemes The current problem with trying to evaluate plausible reasoning using systems of weights with numerical values is that there can be many ways of doing this.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Improving Writing and Argumentation with NLP-Supported"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents