/
Outline Outline

Outline - PowerPoint Presentation

calandra-battersby
calandra-battersby . @calandra-battersby
Follow
377 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-22

Outline - PPT Presentation

Introduction Anotation Segmentation Detection 2 Nodule interpretation characteristics Characteristic Possible Scores Calcification 1 Popcorn 2 Laminated 3 Solid 4 Noncentral 5 Central ID: 415027

moderately lobulation reader 5texture lobulation moderately 5texture reader subtle 5margin margin characteristics irma instances confidence high malignancy predicted suspicious

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Outline" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Outline

Introduction

Anotation

Segmentation

DetectionSlide2

2

Nodule interpretation (characteristics)

Characteristic

Possible Scores

Calcification1. Popcorn2. Laminated3. Solid4. Non-central5. Central6. AbsentInternal structure1. Soft Tissue2. Fluid3. Fat4. AirLobulation1. Marked2. . 3. . 4. .5. NoneMalignancy1. Highly Unlikely 2. Moderately Unlikely3. Indeterminate4. Moderately Suspicious 5. Highly Suspicious

CharacteristicPossible ScoresMargin1. Poorly Defined2. . 3. . 4. .5. SharpSphericity1. Linear2. .3. Ovoid4. .5. RoundSpiculation1. Marked2. . 3. . 4. .5. NoneSubtlety1. Extremely Subtle 2. Moderately Subtle 3. Fairly Subtle 4. Moderately Obvious 5. ObviousTexture1. Non-Solid2. .3. Part Solid/(Mixed) 4. .5. Solid

7 out of 9 semantic characteristics have a broad range of values for the 149 nodulesSlide3

Interpretation

Not only ratings, but also boundaries are different

Reader 1

Reader 2Reader 3Reader 4Lobulation - 4Malignancy - 5 Margin - 4Sphericity - 2Spiculation - 1Subtlety - 5Texture - 4Lobulation - 1Malignancy - 5Margin - 3Sphericity - 4Spiculation - 2Subtlety - 5Texture - 5Lobulation - 2Malignancy - 5Margin - 3Sphericity - 5Spiculation - 2Subtlety - 5Texture - 4Lobulation - 5Malignancy - 5Margin - 2Sphericity - 3Spiculation - 4Subtlety - 5Texture - 4Slide4

Proposed methodology

The automatic mapping extraction is:

SEMI-SUPERVISED

Only small amount of data is initially labeled. Based on ACTIVE LEARNINGIteratively adds data to the training set. Slide5

5

Methodology: Ensemble of classifiers (Active-Decorate)Slide6

6

Results (Accuracy)

Characteristics

Decision trees

Add instances predicted with high confidence (60%)Add instances predicted with high confidence (60%) and instances with low margin (5%)Lobulation27.44%81.00%69.66%Malignancy42.22%96.31%96.31%Margin35.36%98.68%96.83%Sphericity36.15%91.03%

90.24%Spiculation36.15%63.06%58.84%Subtlety38.79%93.14%92.88%Texture53.56%97.10%97.36%Average38.52%88.62%86.02%Slide7

Radiology reportSlide8

IRMA

- T (technical): image modality

- D (directional): body orientation - A (anatomical): body region examined

- B (biological): biological system examined This allows a short and unambiguous notation (IRMA: TTTT – DDD – AAA – BBB),Slide9

IRMASlide10

Questions?