PDF-(READ)-The Ethics of Shared Decision Making

Patients today are more empowered and knowledgeable than they have ever been By law they must be told about the risks and benefits of proposed treatments and give informed consent before treatment is initiated Through the democratization of medical information they have access to peerreviewed medical journals Social media allows patients to share stories with others and to learn about other peoples experiences with various treatments There are websites written by experts at leading medical schools to help patients understand diseases and treatments They have the right to see their medical records The net result of all changes is a shift in the power balance between doctors and patients Ideally as a result of these shifts the patients values and preferences should guide treatment decisionsHowever this proliferation of information often leads to confusion rather than clarity Publicly available information often includes seemingly contradictory conclusions and recommendations Patients dont know which opinions to trust So although patients have more information than ever and many want to make decisions for themselves they need more guidance than ever to help them process an avalanche of informationThis volume aims to help both medical professionals and their patients navigate the evolving healthcare landscape by analyzing the process of shared decisionmaking SDM in clinical medicine The concept of SDM has emerged in the last two decades as a middle ground between on the one hand oldfashinioned physician paternalism of the doctorknowsbest variety and on the other hand unfettered patient autonomy by which patients are thought capable of individually and independently choosing their own medical interventions Advocates of SDM imagine that decisions will be made best if they follow a complex discussion and negotiation between doctor and patient such discussions should incorporate the doctors medical and technical expertise as well as the patients goals values and preferences SDM takes different forms for different patients in different clinical circumstancesThis volume gathers experts in SDM to share their insights about how it ought to be done The authors include clinicians social scientist and philosophers all of whom have thought about or cared for patients from a variety of backgrounds and in a variety of clinical circumstances The papers explore the complexity of SDM and offer practical guidance gained from years of experience about how to employ SDM as effectively as possible. 13 October 2014. Cath Harmer. A/Manager. Policy and Projects, Rural Health. Catherine.Harmer@health.vic.gov.au. Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process that allows patients and their providers to make health care decisions together, taking into account the best scientific evidence available, as well as the patient’s values and preferences. EVERYTHING. . YOU. . NEED. . TO. . KNOW. . ABOUT. . SHARED . DECISION. . MAKING . YOU. . LEARNED. . IN. . KINDERGARTEN. This Kindergarten Lesson is Conflict Free . I have no Conflict of Interest to . An unachievable aim or a current reality for consumers?. Susan Biggar. Health Issues Centre. 13 October 2014. When life changes…. Shared decision making is a great idea…like apple pie and baseball to an American. Peter V. Lee. Executive Director National Health Care Policy, PBGH . Co-Chair, Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project. Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. Research and Policy Forum . January 28, 2010. . Eighth edition. Chapter 1. Ethics in the World of Business. . Copyright © 2017, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Modules. Introduction: Ethics in the World of Business. 1.1. . Douglas Olsen, PhD, RN and Nan Hunt, LMSW, CMAC, CMFSW . WHAT IS ETHICS?. WHAT OUGHT TO BE CONE IN A GIVEN SITUATION, ALL THINGS CONSIDERED?. “. Ought. ” (should vs. can). “. Done. ” (actions vs. ideas, opinions, thoughts). Disclosures:. Narayanaswami . P. (PI) . AHRQ . Grant Number: 1R18HS022004-01. AAN: . Guidelines Development, Dissemination and Implementation subcommittee and Practice Committee. Allergan: . Speakers bureau, advisory board, and injector training. Statin Choice Decision Aid Share-Decision Making SCIP Shared Decision Making Shared Decision Making Glasziou and Haynes ACP JC 2005 Promote a process where patients and clinicians make a choice together. Introduction Counselors are often faced with situations that require sound ethical decision-making ability Determining the appropriate course to take when faced with a di31cult ethical dilemma can be Chronic Conditions . and Long-Term . Care . Planning. July 26, 2016. 2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ET. Sponsored by: . Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2. SHARE Approach Webinar Series. Webinar 6. Dr. Arnel Banaga Salgado. Basic ethical concepts . . The standard of best interest. Applied when a decision must be made about a patient’s health care and the patient is unable to make an informed decision . March 28, . 2021 12:30-1:30. 2. 2022 Face-to-Face Updates. PVB . Data Review . Shared Decision Making and Patient Education PVB Resources. TeamBirth. : . Process Innovation for Clinical Safety, Effective Communication, and Dignity in Childbirth. Christine Dehlendorf, MD MAS. Biftu Mengesha, MD. Angeline Ti, MD MPH. Structure of Course. Part 1: Overview of shared decision making. Part 2: Role-playing. Part 3: Case-based exercises . Part 1. Outline. 1. ERiMA. : . Envisioning Risk Models for Assessment of AI-based applications.. 2. Dr Huma Samin. 1. Post Doctoral Research Associate Computer Science. Durham University, UK. huma.samin@durham.ac.uk.