Energetica si Energii Regenerabile Ploiesti Prahova Energy intensity in Romania 3355 kgoe 1000 Energy intensity at the EU level 1417 kgoe 1000 High potential ID: 484761
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Agentia pentru Eficienta" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Agentia pentru Eficienta
Energetica si
Energii
Regenerabile Ploiesti-
PrahovaSlide2
Energy intensity in Romania:
335.5 kgoe/1000 €Energy intensity at the EU level: 141.7
kgoe/1000 €High potential of energy efficiency improvementEnergy Performance in RomaniaEnPC-INTRANS2Slide3Slide4
Energy Performance in Romania
EnPC-INTRANS
4Energy consumption of the total in tertiary sector in Romania : 38%> 60 mil m2 of buildings in tertiary area
Energy consumption of the total in tertiary sector EU : 21.5%Slide5
Legislation
Increase the EPC awareness in the public sector
Implement EPC modelsWhat to do?EnPC-INTRANS5Slide6
6
Energy PErformance Contracting (EPC
)
This project receives funding from the Horizon 2020
European Union Research and Innovation Programme
under
Grant Agreement No 649639Slide7
10
Partners from 9 countries
Germania
Grecia
Slovenia
Serbia
Letonia
Romania
Slovacia
Croatia
UcrainaSlide8
Estimated results
2
.000 trained experts in 9 countries for EPC for buildings and public services500 public buildings with EPC projects proposed by the trained expertsEstimated impact60 –
90 GWh saved each year60 – 90 mil. EUROS in new investments
Project ProfileSlide9
Main critical aspects encountered
Lack of knowledge and expertise of the municipalities and of public services suppliers in what concerns the development and implementation of EPC.
Insufficient budgetary allocations by the public authorities => no complete thermal rehabilitation.
Reference line (reference consumptions)
– incorrectly assessed.
Thermal rehabilitation consists mostly (80%) in civil works (thermal
i
nsulation)
Incoherency between investment recovery durations and contract durationsSlide10
Main critical aspects encountered
Reticence of the decision makers to consider the EPC business models as financing options.
The proposed contracts – unbalanced, not win-win type, all risks assumed only by ESCO.
Local administrations don’t launch public
acquisition requests
for EPC.
Renovation of the public buildings is delayed.
D
evelopment of a local market for EPC in public buildings is limited.Slide11
11
Actual energy cost
ESCO investment
(20-40% guaranteed
energy savings)
EPC contract
period
time
Energy cost
prior to EE investment
Energy cost after EE investment
Continuous
energy cost savings
of the public
building owner
(20-40 %)
End of EPC contract
(investment paid back)
Saved energy cost
used for the repayment of
ESCO investment
(contracting fees)
ESCO invests in
EE improvements
of public buildings
on the basis of an
EPC business model
ESCO = Energy Service Company
EPC = Energy Performance Contracting
EE = Energy efficiency
Source: GIZ
The concept of EPCSlide12
Development of EPC business cases
12
Source of the underlying chart: Transparense.eu
Main stages of an EPC project:Slide13
Financing as a part of EPC services
13
EPCfull service spectrum
MAINTENANCE & REPAIRFINANCINGENERGY MANAGEMENTRISK TRANSFEROPERATIONS
CONSTRUCTIONPLANNINGSlide14
14
EPC business models
Guaranteed
energy savings (compared to baseline)
Planned investments
No investment
(prior to investment stage)Slide15
So… why EPC contracts?
Because they are…..Helpful to meet the energy efficiency objectives
Source of guaranteed energy savings => lower energy costsNo or low CAPEX for the public authoritiesRisk mitigation source for the public authorities15Slide16
Thank
you!www.ae3r-ploiesti.ro office@ae3r-ploiesti.ro
+ 40 787 61 61 82+ 40 244 51 54 54EnPC-INTRANS16