/
Implementation of Urban Tree Canopy Assessments within the Implementation of Urban Tree Canopy Assessments within the

Implementation of Urban Tree Canopy Assessments within the - PowerPoint Presentation

cheryl-pisano
cheryl-pisano . @cheryl-pisano
Follow
408 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-25

Implementation of Urban Tree Canopy Assessments within the - PPT Presentation

Watershed Preliminary Results Lele Kimball October 18 2013 UTC Workshop Virginia Tech Urban Tree Canopy Economic Benefits Social Benefits Environmental Benefits Watershed Forestry Resource Guide Urban Tree Canopy ID: 333506

canopy tree utc goal tree canopy goal utc public depth setting locality data watershed prioritize prioritization plan urban leveraging

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Implementation of Urban Tree Canopy Asse..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Implementation of Urban Tree Canopy Assessments within the Chesapeake Bay WatershedPreliminary Results

Lele

Kimball

October 18, 2013

UTC Workshop – Virginia TechSlide2

Urban Tree CanopyEconomic Benefits

Social Benefits

Environmental

Benefits

Watershed Forestry Resource Guide - Urban Tree CanopySlide3

Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Assessment

Measures amount of both existing and possible UTC

UTC

assessment is data

!Can help

decision makers effectively design and implement the urban forestMcKee, J. (2009). Slide4

Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Continues to experience population growth and increasing urbanization

1

Currently 17 million people

150,000 more people each year

Nearly 65,000 mi. sq.Loses about 100 acres of forest per day2By 2010, five communities in each state with:Completed assessmentCanopy goal adoptedMeasures to attain the goal120 communities with UTC expansion goals by 2020Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. (WGES)Slide5

Research QuestionsHow are localities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed using UTC

assessments?

Are there ways to increase the use of those assessments?Slide6

Methods

Web-based survey sent to each locality within the Chesapeake Bay watershed with a UTC assessment

Approximately 9.2% of the area in the watershed has a UTC assessment

Total of 100 counties, cities, and towns/boroughs (PA)

Population range from 2,500 to 1.1 million

Area range from 0.5 sq. mi. to almost 1,000 sq. mi.Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. (WGES)Slide7

55% response rate from localities

Representing :

80%

of total area with UTC

assessmentSlide8

67% of localities aware of their UTC assessment

Positive bias due to non-response?Slide9

Most Common types of Uses

85%

Educate public and officials about tree canopySlide10

Most Common types of Uses

65%-75%

Create a

locality-wide

tree canopy

goal

Baseline for canopy changeInform larger initiatives Plan and prioritize tree plantingsSlide11

Inform larger initiatives

Baseline for canopy change

Educate public and officials about tree canopy

Plan and prioritize tree plantings

Create a locality-wide tree canopy goal

Informing and Enforcing Tree Preservation in Policies and Planning

Financial and Public Buy-In

In-Depth Goal Setting and Prioritization

Gathering Data for External Leveraging

Advanced Types of UsesSlide12

Inform larger initiatives

Baseline for canopy change

Educate public and officials about tree canopy

Plan and prioritize tree plantings

Create a locality-wide tree canopy goal

Informing and Enforcing Tree Preservation in Policies and Planning

Financial and Public Buy-In

In-Depth Goal Setting and Prioritization

Gathering Data for External Leveraging

Advanced Types of UsesSlide13

Inform larger initiatives

Baseline for canopy change

Educate public and officials about tree canopy

Plan and prioritize tree plantings

Create a locality-wide tree canopy goal

Informing and Enforcing Tree Preservation in Policies and Planning

Financial and Public Buy-In

In-Depth Goal Setting and Prioritization

Gathering Data for External Leveraging

Advanced Types of UsesSlide14

Inform larger initiatives

Baseline for canopy change

Educate public and officials about tree canopy

Plan and prioritize tree plantings

Create a locality-wide tree canopy goal

Informing and Enforcing Tree Preservation in Policies and Planning

Financial and Public Buy-In

In-Depth Goal Setting and Prioritization

Gathering Data for External Leveraging

Advanced Types of UsesSlide15

Staff Expertise and Training

Localities with:

less

likely to be using

assessment in sophisticated ways.

So training perhaps is only introductory?

“staff trained or attended a workshop on how to use

=

UTC data”

more likely to be using the assessment

but not necessarily in more sophisticated ways

.

“lack of staff expertise”

= Slide16

Informing and Enforcing Tree Preservation in Policies and Planning

Financial and Public Buy-In

In-Depth Goal Setting and Prioritization

Gathering Data for External Leveraging

Biggest Opportunities

For Future UseSlide17

Informing and Enforcing Tree Preservation in Policies and Planning

Financial and Public Buy-In

In-Depth Goal Setting and Prioritization

Gathering Data for External Leveraging

Plan and prioritize tree canopy conservation

Plan and prioritize outreach

Develop sub-locality level tree canopy goals

Biggest Opportunities For Future UseSlide18

ImplicationsCurrently UTC assessments are underutilized.

Raising awareness may increase the number of localities using UTC assessments.

Lack of staff expertise constrains more sophisticated uses.

Need to increase staff expertise.

How to do this?

Through training? If so, need to investigate effectiveness of training and have in-depth training.Biggest opportunity for that training may be in in-depth prioritization and goal setting.Slide19

Questions?

References

Ruark

, E. A. (2010). Immigration, Population Growth and the Chesapeake Bay: Federation for American Immigration Reform

.Chesapeake Bay Program. (2012a). Facts and Figures. Retrieved 9/28/2012, from http://www.chesapeakebay.net/discover/bay101/facts

Figures and Photos"Watershed Forestry Resource Guide - Urban Tree Canopy." Watershed Forestry Resource Guide. Accessed 14 Oct. 2013. <http://www.forestsforwatersheds.org/urban-tree-canopy/>."Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. (WGES) ." Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. (WGES). Accessed14 Oct. 2013. <http://www.wges.com/page/CleanStepsOffsets.html>.McKee, J. (2009). UTC Report for Blacksburg, VA. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.