PPT-MPLP: Reconciling competing goods in archival workflows

Maristella Feustle Music Special Collections Librarian University of North Texas MLA 2017 Orlando FL 2242017 Competing goods Ethical questions seek to reconcile competing goods Thats why theyre difficult. An Exploratory Study of Minimal Processing Practices for Sound Recordings. Sofía. Becerra-. Licha. | . B. erklee. College of Music. SAA . Research . Forum | August . 13, . 2013 . sbecerra@alumni.unc.edu. Anne Gilliland. University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). Archives are a critical component of how many societies remember, are held accountable, and generally conduct their affairs. . Archives are concerned with recorded information and how it can bridge time and space and remain meaningful and useful. . Introducing the Archival Training . Collaborative (ATC. ) . LAMA, . 2009. Presented . by Felicia . Thomas. Graduate Assistant for the ATC. effiet@gmail.com. What’s an Archivist?. Responsible for historical . Charles B. Sears Law Library. SUNY Buffalo Law School. Pondering Privilege. What Would Archival Privilege Look Like and How Would We Get It?. Background. Research started because of the Belfast Project. Taverna. Aleksandra . Pawlik. University . of Manchester. materials by . Dr Katy . Wolstencroft. . and Dr . Aleksandra . Pawlik. http. ://www.taverna.org.uk/. This work is licensed under a . Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. agreements designed to manage competing claims before they reach the level of violence. I refer to these two sets of agreements together as Matthew Sag. Professor of Law, Loyola University of Chicago. msag@luc.edu . © Matthew Sag. . For . discussion, not citation or redistribution. March . 8. , . 2016. 4. %. 2010. 19%. 2011. 43%. 2012. 46%. a Project at UWG. GUGM. May 15, . 2014. Presenters: . Blynne Olivieri (Special Collections) and . Shelley Rogers (Cataloging). Agenda. Process towards implementing EAD Finding Aids. Reviewing DACS2. Reviewing RDA for Archival Materials. Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making:. Evaluating Information Sufficiency. Reconciling and Validating Information. Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria. Module Objective (1 of 2). Safe?. Yes. Sharon Ward May 14,2011. 2. The following is intended to outline QAD’s general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, functional capabilities, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions. The development, release, and timing of any features or functional capabilities described for QAD’s products remains at the sole discretion of QAD.. Workflows, Simplified!. Ad Hoc. Intranet/Portal. Capture. BPM. Since 2008, we have helped over 300 customers increase productivity and drive down costs.. Mobile support.. Touch-screen signatures.. Geo-location.. Oliver Keeble. DOMA. “The WLCG DOMA project consists of several activities in the area of Data Organization, Management and Access, with a focus on the medium/long term . evolution”. https. ://. twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/DomaActivities. HUBzero. : How to Use Pegasus to Execute Computational Pipelines. Ewa Deelman. USC . Information Sciences Institute. Acknowledgement: . Steven Clark, Derrick Kearney, Michael McLennan (. HUBzero. ) . Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry,. Bourgas. University “Prof. . Assen. . Zlatarov. ”. Bulgaria. Outlook. 2. Endpoints. Specificities. Components. Executing module. Algorithm of . Ecotoxicological.