Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee ( - PowerPoint Presentation

1. Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee (REDAC) NASOpsWinter 2015 ReviewBy: Rob Hunt, AJV-73 Date: February 2015Operational Concept Development & InfrastructureBLI Number: 1A01C

2. 2Mission Support Services (AJV) Organizational ChartAirspace Services AJV-1 Director Dennis RobertsAeronautical Information Management AJV-2Director Joshua GustinAeroNav Products AJV-3Director Abby Smith (A)ATO Operational Concepts, Validation & Requirements AJV-7Director Greg BurkeWestern Service Center AJV-WDirector Edie Parish (A)National Flight DataCenter GroupAJV-21Dick PowellGeographic ServicesGroupAJV- 22Dick PowellData System ArchitectureGroupAJV-23Dan GerechtAIM Operations Group AJV-24(Acting) Glenn SigleyEngineering Support GroupAJV-25Jim ScottEn Route Products GroupAJV-31George DavisVisual Charting & AirportMapping GroupAJV-32Eric FreedProduct SupportGroupAJV-34Karen GonzalezTerminal ProductsGroupAJV-35Gregory YamamotoProduction Technology& Air Traffic Products GroupAJV-36Eric SecretanAeroNav ProductsLogistics GroupAJV-37Patricia BanksAirspace Regulations Group AJV-11(Acting) Gary NorekAirspace Optimization Group AJV-12(A) Howie CallonPBN Policy & Support GroupAJV-14(A) Sharon AbhalterObstructionEvaluation GroupAJV-15John PageBusiness SupportGroupAJV-17Steve HollidayQuality Control Group,AJV-W1Chuck ChamberlainOperations Support Group,AJV-W2Clark DesingPlanning and RequirementsGroupAJV-W3James ValleBusiness Services Group,AJV-W4Jay EgbertAdministrative Services Group,AJV-W5Julie FidlerDeputy Director AJV-1 Frank BlackSenior Advisor AJV-WKimberly FlaniganCentral Service Center AJV-CDirector Gus NezerQuality Control Group,AJV-C1Tony RoetzelOperations Support Group, AJV-C2David MedinaPlanning andRequirements Group,AJV-C3Denise KnightBusiness Services Group,AJV-C4Jeff TagueAdministrative Services Group,AJV-C5Lyndon DyerSenior Advisor AJV-C Sharon RushingEastern Service Center AJV-EDirector Mark WardQuality Control Group,AJV-E1(A) John MylesBusiness Services Group,AJV-E4Larry BartsAdministrative Services Group,AJV-E5Maria JamesSenior Advisor AJV-E(A) Debra FayOperations Support Group,AJV-E2Kip JohnsPlanning andRequirements Group,AJV-E3Ryan AlmasyProcess ControlServices GroupAJV-71Pamela CurryATO OperationalConcepts GroupAJV-72Sharon KurywchakTechnical Analysis &OperationalRequirements GroupAJV-73Rob HuntSenior Advisor AJV-1 Leslie SwannAir Traffic ProceduresAJV-8DirectorTBDProcess & Publications GroupAJV-81Air Traffic Control Procedures Group AJV-82Terminal & En RouteOceanic Airspace GroupAJV-18Martin AdamsAIM Systems GroupAJV-26Glenn SigleyDeputy Director AJV-7 VacantVice PresidentAJV-0Elizabeth Lynn RaySenior Advisor AJV-0 Rodger Dean (A)Deputy Vice PresidentAJV-0 Bill Davis Executive AssistantAJV-0 Valentina Smith Special ProjectsAJV-0 Wayne Eckenrode

3. AJV-7 Organizational Relationships3Mission SupportAJV-7Process Control (AJV-71)Operational Requirements (AJV-73)Operational Concepts (AJV-72)ATO OpsAJRAJTAJWAJINextGenNeeds & ShortfallsNeeds & ShortfallsNeeds & ShortfallsNeeds & ShortfallsNeeds & ShortfallsExpert TeamsService AreasAJMProgram ExecutionConcept Dev, Shortfall Analysis, Maturity AssessmentOrganizational RelationshipsAJM-2AJM-3NextGenPrioritized RequirementsEvals,Alts,Trades,Opportunities

4. AJV-7 Organizational Framework 4Process Control AJV-71Process design, facilitation, and continuous improvement utilizing quality metricsDesign, develop and execute quality assurance and controlDefining monitoring and performance metrics of defined processesManage and maintain (operations) PLA master databaseProvide business services (financial and contract management, etc)Operational ConceptsAJV-72Cross-ATO coordination and engagement of service units to create:Operational shortfalls, concept exploration and scenario development Prioritized needs for future development & releasesSingular operational input (response) to documents describing the future environment, including NSIP, NGIP, NAS EA, etc.Day to day operations in the NASRecommend improvements and establish criteria and standards for implementation of Terminal and EnRoute systemsDetermine operational suitabilityValidate equipmentOperational Requirements AJV-73Technical analysis & validation of operational concepts and scenarios, including:Generation of use cases derived from the concepts & scenariosGeneration of prioritized operational requirementsIdentification and conduct of analyses, modeling, and simulationsIn collaboration with AJV-72, conduct/document shortfall analyses, concept development, and concept validation Development of operational & functional requirementsManage projects through Service Analysis and CRDLead the development/progress of investments up to IARD Milestone in AMS (materiel/non-materiel) and develop required documentation (e.g. CONUSE, pPR, projected costs/benefits, EA artifacts, etc)Conduct requirements continuity analysis and implementation planning support as investments progress through AMS

5. Program Description:  Develop, mature, and validate near/mid-term emerging operational concepts to improve the capacity and efficiency of the NAS.Identify and mitigate operational integration concept challenges, focusing on optimizing the integration amongst emerging concepts, and amongst emerging concepts and existing NAS capabilities.Advance an enterprise-based perspective to the evolution of NAS capabilities, enabling a more integrated, synchronized, and sustainable NAS.Partnerships:ANG-C4/C5PMOVolpeNASAFunding Overview:Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure - ATDP FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20$4M$3.5M$3.953M$4M$4M$4M$4M$4M$6M$6M

6. Why is this program necessary?  The FAA is proceeding with NAS modernization based on the NextGen Operational Concept for 2025.  Concept development and validation is necessary to investigate specific concept elements, and to drive out operational and technical requirements and implications for human factors, training and procedures.  This program assesses the interaction of changing roles and responsibilities of NAS service providers and pilots, airspace changes, procedural changes and new mechanized systems for distributing weather, traffic and other flight related information.  It tests the assumptions behind common situational awareness and distributed information processing.The program uses analyses and associated white papers to validate whether future system requirements meet NextGen goals, including the flight data processing evolution in En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM), data communications, the future voice switch, changes in surveillance requirements and associated procedures, establishment of new roles and responsibilities to support increased productivity, etc.  It will develop methods, metrics, and models to demonstrate that the modernized system can handle anticipated growth in traffic demand according to the Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) for incremental years.  This supports the goal of continued US leadership internationally and helps ensure the global harmonization through continued support for the ICAO Global ATM operational concept, the development of global requirements, and the definition of an air transportation performance framework.Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure - ATDP

7. 7Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure - ATDP What are the benefits to the FAAThe activity supports the FAA’s Strategic Initiatives by delivering benefits through technology and infrastructure; Concept validation supports development, analysis, and simulation of new concepts to assess requirements and to evaluate the impact of the concept on system capacity, efficiency, safety and human performance. Evaluation criteria include the following:Impact/Improvement to Air Traffic Service Providers, airspace users, and automation that could increase capacity,Impact/Improvement on airspace structure which may increase productivity and hence capacity, Impact/Improvement on communication, navigation, and surveillance (CNS) requirements to support the FAA's efforts to reducing cost, increasing capacity and efficiency and;Impact/Improvement on automation, display, and facility configuration elements to increase productivity and hence capacity.What determines program successSuccess is measured by the completion of the goals identified in multi-year plans developed for each activity. Initiatives that successfully complete all the project goals identified are then presented as candidates for acquisition.

8. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Concept Maturation:Developed UAS Stakeholder Concept Validation External Stakeholder Engagement PlanUAS Concept Maturation & Validation accomplishments:Performed initial assessment of gaps and concept elements in need of maturation associated with the UAS ConOps Version 2.0 document Modified existing scenarios and created new scenarios deemed necessary through tabletop discussions with working group ATC and UAS SMEsUpdated initial concept level operational requirements based on scenario development/modifications and tabletop discussions with working group SMEsVetted scenarios with ATC SMEs Updated concept level operational requirements based on scenario vetting sessions with ATC SMEs and other key stakeholdersMid-term Timeframe 2018-2020Conducted analysis to establish framework and assumptions for mid-term environment Projected NAS capabilities and traffic projections Identified mature state concept elements that may be applicable in the mid-term Developed operational scenarios that investigated specific mid-term impacts on ATC/ATM operationsDerived initial set of operational requirements from scenario development and tabletop discussions with ATC and UAS SMEsVetted scenarios with ATC SMEs (other than working group SMEs) & other key stakeholdersUpdated operational requirements based on scenario vetting sessions with ATC SMEs & other key stakeholders Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure - Accomplishments

9. Operational Integration Analysis:  Developed operational representation of operational changes to reduce potential risk when implementing mid-term enhancements / capabilities / initiativesPerformed and documented operational integration analysis/vetting using scenarios for several phases of flight and the NSIP Alpha and Bravo segments. Was conducted with SMEs for En Route, TRACON, Oceanic and En Route Cruise Flight Operations. AnalysisIllustrated mid-term capability interactionsIdentified key integration and interoperability risk areas (holes, gaps, opportunities)Developed potential mitigations for the identified potential riskUtilized this program methodology to establish a baseline for assessing future changesNational Special Activity Airspace (NSAAP):  Developed NSAAP Strategic Plan and Multi-Year Project Plan once leadership of NSAAP was transitioned to AJV-7 (2013).Conducted analysis of project artifacts at time of leadership changeInitiated shortfall analyses and ConUse development, and maturation activitiesIdentified requirements gaps between NSAAP and other ongoing activitiesDeveloped “As is” case and identified the shortfalls for ERAM-SAA Integration for ERAM Sector EnhancementDeveloped SAA-ATM Integration Shortfalls Provided SAMS-ERAM integration options/recommendations for ERAM Sector EnhancementContinued shortfall analysis and operational scenario development activities for other operational domains Identified new requirements for SAMS Briefed the National Customer Forum on current and planned activities .Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure - Accomplishments

10. Enterprise IDS (E-IDS):Identified AT information integration shortfalls and recommended mitigationsConducted Stakeholder meetings to review overall investment and future activitiesDeveloped budget and schedule estimates to prepare for a CRD RD for the emerging investment later this yearFinalized program Shortfalls Assessment DocumentationAchieved CRD RD in 2014 RTCA:This program contributes to the FAA's support for the RTCA, a non-profit association that develops standards based on manufacturers, government, and aviation operator inputs. RTCA also recommends operational improvements to increase the efficiency of air transportation.Continued support and analysis of International standard and public/private collaborationOperations Concept Development & Infrastructure - Accomplishments

11. Operational Integration AnalysisObjective: Continued examination of possible operational integration issues as emerging concepts evolve and new concepts are planned for the mid-termPotential Activities: Scenario development/update/execution, mitigation recommendations (e.g. further research, requirements)PBN Optimization Objective: Expand the efficient use of PBN procedures in the NASPotential Activities: Service analyses activities to identify obstacles and mitigations for proliferation of PBNInterval ManagementObjective: Mature advanced interval management applicationsPotential Activities: Concept validation through scenario development/execution, HITLs exercises, Part TasksTrajectory-Based OperationsObjective: Mature Trajectory-Based Operations (TBO) conceptPotential Activities: Leveraging previous trajectory-related pieces (PBN, IM, DataComm, system trajectory improvements, RTCA work), mature and evaluate the TBO conopsRTCA SupportContinued support of international standards and public/private collaboration1111Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure – FY17

12. 12Questions?

13. BACK UP

14. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Concept MaturationObjective: Enable the future increased use of UASs in the NASActivities: Scenario development/execution, functional analysis, requirements development Operational Integration AnalysisObjective: Identify possible operational integration issues amongst emerging concepts, and amongst emerging concepts and existing operational capabilitiesActivities: Scenario development/execution, mitigation recommendations (e.g. further research, requirements)Enterprise-Based Information Delivery and DisseminationObjective: Create an enterprise-based perspective and delivery/dissemination platform for AT support information (existing information and new information planned to be available in the mid-term)Activities: Shortfall analyses, conceptual solutions, requirements developmentNational Special Activity Airspace (SAA) Concept Maturation Objective: Improve the scheduling and real-time use of SAA in the NASActivities: Concept validation, CONOPs revision, requirements development, requirements allocationInterval Management Concept ExplorationObjective: Evaluate Interval management applicationsActivities: Concept development, high-level CONOPsRTCA SupportContinued support of international standards and public/private collaboration1414Operations Concept Development & Infrastructure – FY15 Focus

15. Partnerships:ANG/C4/C5PMOVolpeNASAFunding:Accomplishments / Plans:Identify and mitigate operational integration issues through the development and execution of operational scenarios with SMEs (May 14)Update existing, create new, and execute operational scenarios with SMEs to evaluate the use of UASs in the NAS (May 14)Shortfall analyses of AT spt info (Sep 14)Develop SAA-ATM integration requirements and identify enabling policies/procedures to improve the use of SAAs in the NAS (Sep 14)RTCA: Analyses/documentation in support of standards and public/private collaboration ATDP - Operations Concept Validation and Infrastructure EvolutionDescription: Develop, mature, and validate near/mid-term emerging operational concepts to improve the capacity and efficiency of the NASIdentify and mitigate operational integration concept challenges, focusing on optimizing the integration amongst emerging concepts, and amongst emerging concepts and existing NAS capabilitiesAdvance an enterprise-based perspective to the evolution of NAS capabilities, enabling a more integrated, synchronized, and sustainable NASFY11FY12FY13FY14FY15$4,000,000$3,500,000$3,953,000$4,000,000$4,000,000 (projected)AJV-7 controls funding from FY13 and beyond.