/
ARCHINTERNMEDVOL171NO13JULY112011WWWARCHINTERNMEDCOM ARCHINTERNMEDVOL171NO13JULY112011WWWARCHINTERNMEDCOM

ARCHINTERNMEDVOL171NO13JULY112011WWWARCHINTERNMEDCOM - PDF document

clara
clara . @clara
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2021-09-28

ARCHINTERNMEDVOL171NO13JULY112011WWWARCHINTERNMEDCOM - PPT Presentation

2011AmericanMedicalAssociationAllrightsreservedAnnualWorkHoursAcrossPhysicianSpecialtiestuswasdefinedasanaffirmativeresponsetothediabetesvariableacodebetween250and25093diabetesmellitusinadiagnosticfi ID: 887817

archinternmed medicine andkravitz leigh medicine archinternmed leigh andkravitz practice newyork tancredi vol171 internal july11 2011www allrightsreserved 2011americanmedicalassociation davis withandwithoutcontrolvariables

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "ARCHINTERNMEDVOL171NO13JULY112011WWWARCH..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 ARCHINTERNMED/VOL171(NO.13),JULY11,2011W
ARCHINTERNMED/VOL171(NO.13),JULY11,2011WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM ©2011AmericanMedicalAssociation.Allrightsreserved. AnnualWorkHoursAcrossPhysicianSpecialties tuswasdefinedasanaffirmativeresponsetothediabe-tesvariable,acodebetween250and250.93(“diabetesmellitus”)inadiagnosticfield,and/oranyof3NCHS-defined“reasonforvisit”variablescodedas2205.0(“dia-betesmellitus”).AllstatisticalanalysestookintoaccounttheNHAMCSandNAMCSdesignsandsamplingplans,byretainingallrecordsandtheweighting,strata,andprimarysamplingunitdesignvariables,andusedSAS/STATversion9.2sur-veymodule(SASInstituteInc,Cary,NorthCarolina).Thesesurveys’samplingdesignspermitstatisticallyreliablees-timationwhentheestimateisbasedonatleast30recordsandtheassociatedrelativestandarderroris30%orlower.Thediabetesdatadonotmeetthesecriteria.VisitrateswerecalculatedusingUSCensusBureaudata.Between2003and2008therewere175rec- AnalyseswereconductedusingStataversion11(Stata-Corp,CollegeStation,Texas),accountingforthesurveydesign.Tworegressionanalysescomparedworkhoursamong41specialties,withandwithoutcontrolvariables,withfamilymedicineasreference.Twoadditionalregres-sionscomparedthe4broadcategories,withandwithoutcontrolvariables,withprimarycareasreference.Meanannualhoursworkedwas2524(median,2420;interquartilerange,1960-2940).Thesentsselectedresultsofalinearregressionofannualhoursonthe41specialtiesadjustedforcontrolvariables.Com-paredwithfamilypractice,the3highestspecialtieswerevascularsurgery,criticalcareinternalmedicine,andneo-natalandperinatalmedicine;the3lowestwerepediat-ricemergencymedicine,occupationalmedicine,andIntheregressionforthe4broad-specialtycategorieswithcontrolvariables,surgery(303hours;95%con-fidenceinterval[CI],219to387hours)andinternalmedi-cineandpediatricssubspecialties(208hours;95%CI,132to284hours)hadsignificantlyhigherhours,andothermedical(228hours;95%CI,295to161hours)hadsignificantlylowerhoursthanprimarycare.Con-trolvariablesdidnotmateriallyalteranyoftherank-ingsinanyregression.Excludingphysiciansclassifiedasworkingparttime(mean,32h/wk)didnotaffectrelativerankingsinanyregression.Wefoundthatspecialistscaringformoreacutelyillpatientsorthoserequiringintensivemonitor-ing(usuallyinhospitalsettings)worklongerhoursthanphysiciansfocusedonmorestable,chronicallyillpa-tients(mostlyinambulatorysettings).Theexceptionswerephysicianspracticingemergencymedicineorhos-pitalmedicine.Bothofthesespecialtiesarecharacter-izedbyfixed,hourlyshifts;althoughpatientacuitymaybehigh,thenumberofworkhoursperdayanddayspermontharelimited.Ourrankingsaresomewhatsimilartostudiesofan-nualincome,withproceduralspecialtiesbeingpaidmorethancognitivespecialties.Buttherearedifferences.Neu-rologicalsurgeryreceivesthehigheststatisticallysignifi-cantwage,yetisnotsignificantinthehoursrankings.Dermatologistshavesignificantlyhigherwagesandsig-nificantlylowerhours.Familypracticereceivesoneofthelowestwagesbutisnearthemiddleofthehoursrank-Finally,amongbroadcategories,primarycarere-ceivesthelowestwagebutisneitherthehighestnorlow-estforhours. Vascular surgery888 (446 to 1330) Critical care internal medicine 689 (350 to 1029) Neonatal and perinatal medicine 564 (307 to 820) Thoracic surgery488 (237 to 740) Other surgical subspecialties446 (144 to 748) Pulmonary diseases4

2 25 (263 to 587) Medical oncology340 (75
25 (263 to 587) Medical oncology340 (75 to 604) General surgery326 (174 to 478) Obstetrics and gynecology278 (132 to 423) Neurological surgery270 (418 to 958) Urology264 (78 to 449) Cardiovascular diseases234 (55 to 413) Orthopedic surgery215 (53 to 378) Pulmonary critical care medicine182 (– Gastroenterology166 (4 to 329) Nephrology164 (– Geriatric medicine 131 (– Other pediatric subspecialties117 (– Internal medicine109 (18 to 201) Internal medicine and pediatrics107 (– Rheumatology47 (– Infectious diseases41 (– Otolaryngology24 (– Hematology and oncology 4 (– Family practice0 Plastic surgery– Radiation oncology– Ophthalmology– Neurology– Hospitalists– General practice– Allergy and immunology– Endocrinology– Child and adolescent psychiatry– Pediatrics– Psychiatry– Emergency medicine– Physical medicine and rehabilitation– Dermatology– Occupational medicine– Pediatric emergency medicine – – 1000 0 1000 500 – 500 1500Hours Hours above or belowFamily Practice and (95% CI) Adjustedmeandifferencesinannualworkhoursforphysicianspecialtiesvsfamilypracticeincommunitytrackingsurvey(n=6381).Note:Estimatesamultiplelinearregressionthatstatisticallyadjustedforphysician,practice,andmarketcharacteristics(seetextfordetails).Errorbarsrepresent95%confidence ARCHINTERNMED/VOL171(NO.13),JULY11,2011WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM ©2011AmericanMedicalAssociation.Allrightsreserved. Specialtieswithmore(less)workhourstendtohaverelativelylow(high)physicianjobsatisfactionratings.Forexample,pediatricians,dermatologists,andchildandadolescentpsychiatristsreportedrelativelylowhoursandhaverelativelyhighcareersatisfaction.Similarlyobste-tricianandgynecologistsreportedrelativelyhighhoursandhaverelativelylowcareersatisfaction.However,thisrelationshipdoesnotalwayshold;forexample,neona-tologistsandperinatologistsreportedhighaveragehoursyethavehighcareersatisfaction.Ourstudyhadlimitations.TheCTSexcludedradi-ologists,anesthesiologists,andpathologists.Self-reportedworkhoursdidnotcapturevariabilityacrossday,swing,ornightshiftsorforweekendsorweekdays,norwerehours-on-callincluded.Finally,theCTShavedatafrom2008,theonlywaveafter2004-2005.TheCTSadministrators,however,warnagainstcomparingthe2008datatostudiesusing2004-2005data.Weranked41specialtiesand4broadcategoriesbyannualworkhours.Webelievethisrankingwilllikelybeusefultomedicalstudents,residencydirectors,hos-pitaladministrators,physicianscontemplatingswitch-ingspecialties,andpolicymakers.AuthorAffiliations:CenterforHealthcarePolicyandRe-search,DepartmentsofPublicHealthSciences(DrLeigh),Pediatrics(DrTancredi),FamilyandCommunityMedi-cine(DrJerant),andInternalMedicine,DivisionofGen-eralMedicine(DrKravitz),UniversityofCaliforniaDavisSchoolofMedicine,Davis.DrLeigh,DepartmentofPublicHealthSciences,UCDavisMedicalSchool,1ShieldsAve,MS1C,Davis,CA95616-8638(pleigh@ucdavis.edu).AuthorContributions:DrLeighhadfullaccesstoallofthedatainthestudyandtakesresponsibilityforthein-tegrityofthedataandtheaccuracyofthedataanalysis.Studyconceptanddesign:Leigh,Tancredi,andKravitz.Acquisitionofdata:Leigh,Tancredi,andKravitz.sisandinterpretationofdata:Leigh,Tancredi,andJer-Draftingofthemanuscript:Criticalrevisionofthemanuscriptforimportantintellectualcontent:Leigh,Tan-credi,Jerant,andKravitz.Statistic

3 alanalysis:LeighandObtainedfunding:Admin
alanalysis:LeighandObtainedfunding:Administrative,tech-nical,andmaterialsupport:Leigh,Jerant,andKravitz.FinancialDisclosure:Nonereported.ThisstudywasfundedinpartbygrantstoDrLeighfromtheNationalInstituteforOccupa-tionalSafetyandHealth(grant1R01H008248-01)andDrsTancrediandKravitzfromtheUCDavisOfficeoftheViceChancellorforResearch.RoleoftheSponsors:Thefundingsourceshadnoinvolvementinthedesignandconductofthestudy;collection,management,analysis,andinterpretationofthedata;orpreparation,review,orapprovalofthe1.LeighJP,TancrediD,JerantA,KravitzRL.Physicianwagesacrossspecial-ties:informingthephysicianreimbursementdebate.ArchInternMed.2010;2.DorseyER,JarjouraD,RuteckiGW.Influenceofcontrollablelifestyleonre-centtrendsinspecialtychoicebyUSmedicalstudents..2003;290(9):3.RosenthalMP,DiamondJJ,RabinowitzHK,etal.Influenceofincome,hoursworked,andloanrepaymentonmedicalstudents’decisiontopursueapri-marycarecareer..1994;271(12):914-917.4.FletcherKE,DavisSQ,UnderwoodW,MangrulkarRS,McMahonLFJr,SaintS.Systematicreview:effectsofresidentworkhoursonpatientsafety.AnnIn-ternMed.2004;141(11):851-857.5.LeighJP,TancrediDJ,KravitzRL.Physiciancareersatisfactionwithinspecialties.BMCHealthServRes.2009;9:166. COMMENTSANDOPINIONS Outcome-BlindedPeerReviewhestudyconductedbyEmersonetalstrongevidenceofpositiveoutcomebias,yetdoesnotfullyaddresshowtoapproachtheproblem.Makingreviewersandauthorsmoreawareoftheprob-lemofpositiveoutcomebias,asEmersonetalcouldincreasethenumberofarticlespublishedwithnullfindings.Butaddingacounteractingbiastothealreadypresentpositiveoutcomebiasmightleadtoover-orun-dercompensation.Theoretically,onecouldonlyre-move(asopposedtocounteract)positiveoutcomebiasbyblindingreviewerstotheoutcomesofstudies.Aprac-ticalversionofthiswouldbetosemiblind.Reviewersevaluatingamanuscriptunderasemi-blindapproachwouldassessitinsteps.Reviewerswouldfirstbeprovidedwithamanuscriptshellthatwouldin-cludethemanuscriptbackgroundanddetailedmethodssection.Thelatterwouldcontainenoughdetailtode-terminethepowerandpotentialgeneralizabilityofthestudy.Reviewerswouldalsoreceiveallofthedatatablesandfigures,withbreakdownsofavailablesamplesizesandrelevantfollow-uptimesforsubgroups.Butthesetablesandfigureswouldbestrippedofactualresults.Onthebasisofthisinformation,reviewerscouldrenderapreliminarydecisionregardingtheimportanceofthemanuscript.Oncethereviewershadenteredtheirevalu-ation,theresultsanddiscussionsectionofthemanu-scriptcouldthenbereleasedtoandevaluatedbythesamereviewersandtheirfinalinputwouldbesought.Hope-fully,thereviewers’initialcommitmenttoassessingthequalityandimportanceofthestudywouldminimizetheimpactofanybiasintroducedwhenthereviewersfi-nallyseethestudy’sresults.AuthorAffiliations:HealthOutcomesResearchGroup,DepartmentofEpidemiologyandBiostatistics,Memo-rialSloan-KetteringCancerCenter,NewYork,NewYork.DrBach,HealthOutcomesResearchGroup,DepartmentofEpidemiologyandBiostatistics,Me-morialSloan-KetteringCancerCenter,307E63rdSt,Sec-ondFloor,NewYork,NY10065(bachp@mskcc.org).FinancialDisclosure:Nonereported.J.PaulLeigh,PhDDanielTancredi,PhDAnthonyJerant,MDRichardL.Kravitz,MD,MSPHJoshuaN.Mirkin,ABPeterB.Bach,MD,MAPP ARCHINTERNMED/VOL171(NO.13),JULY11,2011WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM ©2011AmericanMedicalAssociation.Allrightsreserved

Related Contents


Next Show more