Greg Sampson Regional Specialist Mark Yoho Regional Specialist Tim Hilborn Regional Specialist Session Target Participants will ask questions around the implementation of OTES Lets start with a question ID: 792601
Download The PPT/PDF document "Central Ohio RttT Team Scott Spears – ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Central Ohio RttT Team
Scott Spears – Regional CoordinatorGreg Sampson – Regional SpecialistMark Yoho – Regional SpecialistTim Hilborn – Regional Specialist
Slide2Session Target
Participants will ask questions around the
implementation of OTES.
Slide3Let’s start with a question:
What questions might you have around the implementation of OTES?
Slide4OK…We will ask the first question:
What are the ramifications of selecting the OTES as the evaluation tool for our school district?
Slide5Slide6Some of the Answers…Questions
We have selected OTES as our instrument.Who will train teachers? When/How?What will the training include:
How will you teach the teachers about the Framework?How will you teach the teachers about Student Growth Measures?What documents will you use?
Who will train new teachers and teachers new to the district? (Subsequent years) Who will train the principals? (Subsequent years)OTES…yet the local components take some training?
Slide7Regardless the system
What documents need created/altered or provided for the system?Where will the documents housed?How will you inform stakeholders?
How will updates be communicated?
Slide8Some of the Answers…Questions
Will your LEA have Hard Copies, Electronic Copies or a combination?Where will documents be stored once completed?
Will there be a hard copy, of all documents? Where will these be stored? For how long?If all copies are electronic where will they be stored?
In eTPES…who will train the end users on how to do this…when?In a “file”.
Slide9Some of the Answers…Questions
Concerning SLO’sWhat form’s’ will SLO’s be written on?
When are SLO’s due? To whom?What is the process for approval/disapproval?What is the timeline for approval/disapprovalWhat is the timeline/process for resubmitted SLO’s?
Who is on the SLO Committee? What is the composition?How do you get on the committee…how do you get off the committee?
How often will the committee meet…where?
Who will lead the committee? How will this be decided?
What
guidelines will be established for the use of assessments?
What
procedures will be established for new teachers and teachers in new assignments?
What criteria will be established defining “evidence
”?
Slide10Some of the Answers…Questions
Issues to Consider around assessments:What guidelines will be established for the use of assessments on SLO’s?
Can teachers make their own assessments?Can teachers grade their own assessments?What guidelines will be established for rigor?
What assessment literacy training and ground rules will be established?What guidelines for establishing growth targets will be established?When will assessment data be due? To whom? In/On what form?
Slide11Some of the Answers…Questions
Issues to Consider:What procedures will be established for new teachers and teachers in new assignments?How will you insure that new teachers and teachers in new assignments know what students should know and be able to do by the end of the course.
How will you insure that new teachers and teachers in new assignments know where students are upon entering the grade or course?How will your LEA establish baseline or trend data?
Slide12Some of the Answers…Questions
Issues to Consider:Who will categorize teachers into:Category A
Category A1Category BCategory CHow will this categorization be communicated?
How and when will teachers be introduced to Growth Plans?How and when will teachers be introduced to Improvement Plans?How will Growth Plans, Improvement Plans and a teachers IPDP be related?
What forms will be used?
How will the forms be “evaluated” for completion? When?
Where will the forms be once completed/approved?
Slide13Student Growth Measures
What percentages will your district attribute to each category?What are the ramifications?
Slide14Student Growth Measures
Category A1 – All Value Added Teacher Level Reports2013-14 Value Added (26 – 50%)
+ Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s)
+ Shared Attribution SGM (50%)
Slide15Student Growth Measures
Category A1 – All Value Added Teacher Level Reports2014-15
Value AddedSGM (50%)
Slide16Student Growth Measures
Category B – Teacher with ODE Approved Assessments2013-14 Approved Assessment (10 – 50%)
+ Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s)
+ Shared Attribution
SGM (50%)
Slide17Student Growth Measures
Category C: Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s) SLO – 1
+ SLO – 2
+ Shared Attribution (Possibly)
SGM (50%)
Slide18Student Growth Measure Rating
50% of Final Summative Rating
Slide19OTES Framework
H
Slide20TEACHER “DESIGNATION”
Accomplished
Proficient
Developing
Ineffective
Slide21eTPES Decisions
Slide22Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES)
Policy Decisions:What procedures will be approved for “Accomplished” Teachers?The Board may elect, by adopt of a resolution, to evaluate each teacher who received a rating of “
Accomplished” on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this section once every two school years. In that case, the biennial evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the 10th
of May.Who does the Board designate as “Credentialed Evaluators”?
Slide23Credentialed Evaluators
:
Evaluators must be credentialed by ODE and can include the following:
Under contract with board and hold superintendent, asst. superintendent, or principal license.
Under contract with board and hold vocational director, administrative specialist, or supervisor license.
A person designated to conduct evaluations under agreement entered into by the board
A person designated to conduct evaluations under agreement for peer review entered into by board and representatives of teachers employed by board.
A person employed by an entity contracted by the board (i.e. ESC) and having proper license.
Slide24Professional Growth Plan
Slide25Professional Improvement Plans
Slide26Retention and Promotion Decisions
Slide27Removing Poorly Performing Teachers
Slide28Allocation of Financial Resources for Professional Development