Toon Van Camp Table of contents 2 We have to ask where markets belongand where they dont Michael Sandel 3 Basic observation The trading of products often has negative externalities on a third party ex child labor but people ID: 787950
Download The PPT/PDF document "Morals and Markets Armin Falk & Nora..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Morals and Markets
Armin Falk & Nora Szech
Toon Van Camp
Slide2Table of contents
2
Slide3“We have to ask where markets belong—and where they don’t.”
Michael Sandel
.3
Slide4Basic observation:
The trading of products often has negative externalities on a third party (ex: child labor) but people go against their own moral standards and trade anyways.
1. The question:
do markets erode morals?
4
Slide52. Basic Hypothesis: Markets tend to erode moral values
A trade
involves 2 people: the guilt is shared which means that both parties interacting feel less guilt.
Market interaction reveals information on
social norms
: “if other people trade an item it has to be ok for me to trade it as well”.
The
existence of a market for something
in itself might mean that trading something is
morally acceptable.
Markets
provide a strong framing and focus on materialistic aspects such as bargaining, negotiation, and competition. They may
divert attention
from the adverse consequences of the trade.
In a multilateral market with multiple sellers the notion of being pivotal may be diffused: unless you care about what you are selling you could say “ if I don’t sell it, someone else will”.5
Slide63. The experiment
The mouse paradigm: participants could decide to save a mouse’s life and receive no money or to earn money but to accept the killing of a mouse.Three
different market conditions: 1) The individual market 2) The bilateral market 3) The multilateral market
6
Slide73. The experiment
1) The individual market: Choice between
option A and option BIn option A the mouse survives but the participant gets no money
In option B
the mouse dies and the participant gets 10€
7
Slide83. The experiment
2) The bilateral marketDouble auction market:One buyer and one seller
bargain over the killing of a mouse over the course of 10 periodsThere is a total of 20€ that the two parties can split up between themselves.
If a trade is made the
buyer
receives 20€ - the price agreed upon by the seller and the mouse is killed.
If no trade is made
both players
receive nothing but the mouse is
saved
8
Slide93. The experiment
3) The multilateral marketSame conditions as in the bilateral market but:There are 7 buyers
and 9 sellersEach seller had one mouse
9
Slide103. The experiment
To provide a more detailed effect of markets on morals, another individual treatment was set-up: the price-list treatment.
This treatment informs us about how much money subjects would need to receive in the individual condition to yield a similarly high killing rate as in markets.Individuals are asked to choose between option A ( saving the mouse and receiving no money) or option B receiving X amount of money which
increases by 2.5€ with each refusal of option B
up to 50€.
A: Save the mouse
A: Save the mouse
A: Save the mouse
A: Save the mouse
…
B: receive 5€
B: receive 7.50€
B: receive 10€
B: receive 12.50€
…
10
Slide113. The experiment
The final step of the experiment was to compare the decay in moral versus morally neutral values.Hypothesis:
the decay in moral values is greater than the decay of private consumption values.
New test
: sellers received a
coupon for gift shop
that they could sell
This new test was carried out in the
three different market conditions of before
and in the
price list treatment
.
Thus conditions were identical and the difference was that the trade involved an
opportunity cost of not consuming rather than a moral cost.
11
Slide124. The results: Main test
12
Slide134. The results:
price list treatment
In the bilateral market, 72.2% of sellers were willing to trade for prices below or equal to 10€. In the price list treatment, a similar willingness to kill (71.9%) was only reached for monetary amounts of 47.50 euros
In the
Multilateral market
, 75.9% of sellers were willing to trade for prices
below or equal to 10€.
In the
price list treatment
, a similar willingness to kill would require a
monetary reward of 50€.
13
Slide144. The results: decay in moral vs morally neutral values
14
Slide15In the mouse treatments, there is a strong negative effect of market interaction.
For a given amount, people reveal a higher willingness to kill in a market than in the individual condition.There is also a difference in the price dynamic between multilateral mouse and coupon markets. In the mouse market, prices start at a lower level and tend to slope downwards.
In the coupon market the prices show no significant trend.Therefore, we can conclude that moral values decline significantly more than values that are morally neutral.
15
4. The results:
decay in moral vs morally neutral values
Slide165. Conclusions
Markets do indeed erode morals: in presence of a
market people are far more easily willing to give up on their values than when there is no market.Moral values decline faster
than
morally neutral values
:
in a market, prices for moral values
decline very fast
as a result of social learning and endogenous social norm formation. However, prices for morally neutral values
do not really vary
.
This experiment confirms the need to
ban
markets for “repugnant” activities
This experiment shows there is a need to think about where markets are appropriate.16
Slide17Questions?
17