/
Flow and Energy Momentum Tensor From Flow and Energy Momentum Tensor From

Flow and Energy Momentum Tensor From - PowerPoint Presentation

conchita-marotz
conchita-marotz . @conchita-marotz
Follow
510 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-28

Flow and Energy Momentum Tensor From - PPT Presentation

Classical Gluon Fields Rainer J Fries Texas AampM University NFQCD Kyoto December 5 2013 Classical Gluon Fields and MV Model Analytic Solutions for Early Times Phenomenology Beyond BoostInvariance ID: 296584

2013 flow nfqcd rainer flow 2013 rainer nfqcd fries fields transverse energy color density longitudinal classical field rjf hydro gluon chen analytic

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Flow and Energy Momentum Tensor From" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Flow and Energy Momentum Tensor From Classical Gluon Fields

Rainer J. FriesTexas A&M University

NFQCD Kyoto, December 5, 2013Slide2

Classical Gluon Fields and MV ModelAnalytic Solutions for Early Times

PhenomenologyBeyond Boost-InvarianceWork in collaboration mainly withGuangyao Chen (Texas A&M)

Sener Ozonder (INT/Seattle, Minnesota)Rainer Fries2

NFQCD 2013

OverviewSlide3

Bulk evolution

Local thermal equilibrium with small (?) dissipative corrections after time 0.2-1 fm/c.

Expansion and cooling via viscous hydrodynamics.Hadronic phase: Hydro or Transport.Pre-equilibrium: color glass condensate (CGC); successful predictions of eccentricities and fluctuations of the energy density  flow observables

IP-Glasma Poor constraints on initial flow and other variables.p+A

?Rainer Fries

3

NFQCD 2013

The “Standard Model” of URHICs

[B.

Schenke

et al., PRL108 (2012); C. Gale et al. , PRL 110 (2013)]Slide4

Nuclei/hadrons at asymptotically high energy:

Saturated gluon density ~ Qs-2  scale

Qs >> QCD, classical fields.

Single nucleus: solve Yang-Mills equations for gluon field A

(

).

Source = light cone current

J

(given by SU(3) charge distribution

).

Calculate observables O

(

) from the gluon field

A

(

). from random Gaussian color fluctuations of a color-neutral nucleus.

Rainer Fries

4

NFQCD 2013

MV Model: Classical YM Dynamics

[L.

McLerran

, R. Venugopalan]Slide5

Two nuclei: intersecting

currents J1,

J2 (given by  1, 2

), calculate gluon field A

(

1

, 

2

) from YM.

Equations of motion

Boundary conditions

Rainer Fries

5

NFQCD 2013

MV Model: Classical YM Dynamics

[A.

Kovner

, L.

McLerran

, H.

Weigert

]Slide6

Numerical Solutions of Classical YM in the forward light cone.

Quantum corrections, Instabilities, Thermalization, …

Here: Analytic solution of classical theory.Analyze pressure and flow for small times.Rainer Fries

6

NFQCD 2013Glasma

in the Forward Light Cone

[

Krasnitz

,

Venugopalan

]

[T.

Lappi

]

…Slide7

Before the collision: color glass = pulse of strictly transverse (color) electric and magnetic fields, mutually orthogonal, with random color orientations, in each nucleus.

Rainer Fries

7NFQCD 2013Fields: Before CollisionSlide8

Before the collision: color glass = pulse of strictly transverse (color) electric and magnetic fields, mutually orthogonal, with random color orientations, in each nucleus.

Immediately after overlap (forward light cone,   0): strong longitudinal electric & magnetic fields. Non-

abelian effect.Rainer Fries8

NFQCD 2013

Fields: At Collision

E

0

B

0

[L.

McLerran

, T.

Lappi

, 2006]

[RJF, J.I.

Kapusta

, Y. Li, 2006]Slide9

NFQCD 2013

9Rainer Fries

Fields: Into the Forward Light Cone

[

Guangyao

Chen, RJF]

Once the

non-

abelian

longitudinal fields E

0

, B

0

are seeded, the first step of further evolution can be understood

in terms of

the QCD versions of Ampere’s

, Faraday’s and Gauss’ Law.

Longitudinal

fields E

0

, B

0

decrease in both z

and t away from the light coneFirst abelian

theory:Gauss’ Law at fixed time t

Long. flux imbalance compensated by transverse fluxGauss: rapidity-odd radial fieldAmpere/Faraday as function of t: Decreasing long. flux induces transverse fieldAmpere/Faraday: rapidity-even curling

field

Full classical QCD:

[G. Chen, RJF, PLB 723 (2013)]Slide10

Transverse fields for randomly seeded A

1, A2 fields (abelian case).

 = 0: Closed field lines around longitudinal flux maxima/minima  0: Sources/sinks for transverse fields appear

Rainer Fries

10

NFQCD 2013

Initial Transverse Field: VisualizationSlide11

Rainer Fries

11NFQCD 2013

Analytic Solution: Small Time Expansion [RJF, J.

Kapusta, Y. Li, 2006][

Fujii

, Fukushima, Hidaka, 2009]

Here: analytic solution using small-time expansion for gauge field

R

ecursive solution for gluon field:

0

th

order = boundary conditionsSlide12

Rainer Fries

12NFQCD 2013

Analytic Solution: Small Time Expansion Convergence for weak field limit: recover analytic solution for all times.

Convergence for strong fields: convergence radius ~ 1/Q

s for averaged quantities like energy density.Slide13

Initial ( = 0)

structure of the energy-momentum tensor from purely londitudinal fields

Rainer Fries13

NFQCD 2013

Energy Momentum Tensor

Transverse pressure

P

T

=

0

Longitudinal pressure

P

L

= –

0

 Slide14

NFQCD 2013

14Rainer Fries

Energy Momentum TensorFlow emerges from pressure at order 1:

Transverse

Poynting vector gives transverse flow.

Like hydrodynamic flow, determined by gradient of

transverse pressure

P

T

=

0

; even in rapidity.

Non-hydro like; odd in rapidity ??

[RJF, J.I.

Kapusta

, Y. Li, (2006)]

[G. Chen, RJF, PLB 723 (2013)]Slide15

NFQCD 2013

15Rainer Fries

Energy Momentum TensorCorrections to energy density and pressure due to flow at second order in timeExample: energy density

Depletion/increase of energy density due to transverse flow

Due to longitudinal flowSlide16

Transverse Poynting

vector for randomly seeded A1, A2 fields (abelian case).

 = 0: “Hydro-like” flow from large to small energy density  0: Quenching/amplification of flow due to the underlying field structure.

Rainer Fries

16

NFQCD 2013

Transverse Flow: VisualizationSlide17

Rainer Fries

17NFQCD 2013

Modelling Color ChargesSo far color charge densities  1, 2

fixed.MV: Gaussian distribution around color-neutral average

Sample distribution to obtain event-by-event observables.

Next: analytic calculation of expectation values (as function of average

color charge densities

1

,

2

).

Transverse flow comes from gradients in nuclear profiles.

Original MV

model

 = const

. Here: relaxed condition,  constant on length scales 1/Qs , allow variations on larger length scales 1/m where m

<< Qs.

[G. Chen, RJF, PLB 723 (2013)]

[G. Chen et al., in preparation]Slide18

NFQCD 2013

18Rainer Fries

Averaged Density and FlowEnergy density ~ product of nuclear gluon distributions ~ product of color source densities“Hydro” flow:

“Odd“ flow term:

With

we

have

Order

2

terms …

[T.

Lappi

, 2006]

[RJF,

Kapusta

, Li, 2006]

[

Fujii

, Fukushima, Hidaka, 2009]

[G. Chen, RJF, PLB 723 (2013)]

[G. Chen et al., in preparation]Slide19

NFQCD 2013

19Rainer Fries

Higher Orders in TimeGenerally: powers of  go with factors of Q or factors of transverse gradients

Number of terms with gradients in

1

,

2

rises rapidly for higher orders in time.

For the case of near homogeneous charge densities when gradients can be neglected the expressions are fairly simple.

Example: ratio of longitudinal and transverse pressure at

midrapidity

 

[G. Chen et al., in preparation]Slide20

Ratio of longitudinal and transverse pressure. Pocket formula for homogeneous nuclei (no transverse gradients):

Rainer Fries

20NFQCD 2013Comparison with Numerical Solutions

[F.

Gelis

, T.

Epelbaum

,

arxiv:1307.2214]

 

 Slide21

Ratio of longitudinal and transverse pressure. Pocket formula for homogeneous nuclei (no transverse gradients):

Rainer Fries

21NFQCD 2013Comparison with Numerical Solutions

 

[F.

Gelis

, T.

Epelbaum

,

arxiv:1307.2214]

 Slide22

NFQCD 2013

22Rainer Fries

Check: Event-By-Event PictureExample: numerical sampling of charges for “odd” vector  i in

Au+Au (b

=4 fm).

Averaging over events: recover analytic result.

PRELIMINARY

Analytic expectation value

Energy density

N

=1Slide23

Rainer Fries

23NFQCD 2013

Flow Phenomenology: b  0

Odd flow needs asymmetry between sources. Here: finite impact parameter

Flow field for

Au+Au

collision,

b

= 4 fm.

Radial

flow following gradients in the fireball at

=

0.

In addition

: directed

flow away from

= 0.

Fireball is rotating, exhibits angular momentum.

|

V

| ~ 0.1 at the surface @

~ 0.1Slide24

NFQCD 2013

24

Rainer FriesPhenomenology: b  0

Angular momentum is natural: some old models have it, most modern hydro calculations don’t.Some exceptions

Do we determine flow incorrectly when we miss the rotation?

Directed flow

v

1

:

Compatible with hydro with suitable initial conditions.

[

Gosset

,

Kapusta

,

Westfall (1978)]

[Liang, Wang (2005)]

MV only, integrated over transverse plane, no hydro

[

L.

Csernai

et al. PRC 84 (2011)]

…Slide25

Odd flow needs asymmetry between sources. Here: asymmetric nuclei.

Flow field for Cu+Au collisions:

Odd flow increases expansion in the wake of the larger nucleus, suppresses flow on the other side.b0 & A B: non-trivial flow pattern  characteristic signatures from classical fields?

Rainer Fries

25

NFQCD 2013

Phenomenology: A

 BSlide26

CGC fingerprints? Need to evolve systems to larger times.Examples:

Forward-backward asymmetries of typeHere p+Pb:

Rainer Fries26

NFQCD 2013

Phenomenology: A  B

 

Directed flow asymmetry

Radial flow asymmetrySlide27

No equilibration here; see other talks at this workshop.Pragmatic solution: extrapolate from both sides (

r() = interpolating fct.)

Here: fast equilibration assumption: Matching: enforce (and other conservation laws).Analytic solution possible for matching to ideal hydro.4 equations + EOS to determine 5 fields in ideal hydro. Up to second order in time:

Odd flow 

drops out: we are missing angular momentum!

Rainer Fries

27

NFQCD 2013

Matching to Hydrodynamics

p

T

LSlide28

Instantaneous matching to viscous hydrodynamics using in addition

Mathematically equivalent to imposing smoothness condition on all components of T.

Leads to the same procedure used by Schenke et al.Numerical solution for hydro fields:

R

otation and odd flow terms readily translate into hydrodynamics fields.

Rainer Fries

28

NFQCD 2013

Matching to HydrodynamicsSlide29

Intricate 3+1 D global structure emergesExample: nodal plane of longitudinal flow, i.e.

vz = 0 in x-y-

 spaceFurther analysis: Need to run viscous 3+1-D hydro with large viscous corrections.Work in progress.

Rainer Fries

29

NFQCD 2013

Initial Event ShapeSlide30

Real nuclei are slightly off the light cone.Classical gluon distributions calculated by Lam and

Mahlon. Nuclear collisions off the light cone?Approximations for RA/

 << 1/Qs:Because of d

/d = 0 the energy density

just after nuclear overlap is a linear superposition of all energy density created during nuclear overlap.

New (transverse) field components Lorentz suppressed  only count longitudinal fields in initial energy density.

Then use Lam-

Mahlon

gluon distributions in “old” formula for

0

.

Rainer Fries

30

NFQCD 2013

Classical QCD Beyond Boost Invariance

[S.

Ozonder

, RJF,

arxiv:1311.3390]

[

C.S. Lam, G.

Mahlon

, PRD 62 (2000)

]Slide31

We can calculate the fields and energy momentum tensor in the clQCD approximation for

 < 1/Qs analytically.Simple expressions for homogeneous nuclei.

Transverse energy flow shows interesting and unique (?) features: directed flow, A+B asymmetries, etc.Interesting features of the energy flow are naturally translated into their counterparts in hydrodynamic fields in a simple matching procedure. Future phenomenology: hydrodynamics with large dissipative corrections.3 Questions:Are there corrections to observables we think we know well (like elliptic flow)?Are there phenomena that we completely miss with too simplistic state-of-the art initial conditions?

Are there flow signatures unique to CGC initial conditions that we can observe?Rainer Fries

31

NFQCD 2013

Summary