PDF-Inequality and e

Author : conchita-marotz | Published Date : 2015-08-31

1 conomic m arginalisation How the s tructure of the e conomy i mpacts on o pportunities on the m argins KATE PHILIP Programme Manager Inequality and Economic Marginalisation

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Inequality and e" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Inequality and e: Transcript


1 conomic m arginalisation How the s tructure of the e conomy i mpacts on o pportunities on the m argins KATE PHILIP Programme Manager Inequality and Economic Marginalisation Trade and Indu. Dr Carlie Goldsmith . Aims of the workshop . Introduce you to academic debates on social inequality. . Examine rates of income and wealth inequality in Britain and comparatively. . Examine evidence that shows how the size of the gaps in income affects social life, and in particular the prevalence of social problems. . By . Raymundo. Campos, Gerardo Esquivel and Nora . Lustig. Presented by Nora . Lustig. “The New Policy Model, Poverty and Inequality in Latin America”. WIDER, Buenos Aires, September 1-3, 2011. Outline . st. century policy. Branko. . Milanovic. March 2011. Email: . bmilanovic@worldbank.org. Based on the book . Worlds Apart. , 2005 . and . The Haves and the Have-Nots. , 2010 and other . updates. Main points. : THE . ENEMY BETWEEN US. Source: Wilkinson & Pickett, The Spirit Level (2009). Lerwick. , Shetland Islands 2/09/2014. Maddy. Power. from. The Equality Trust. The Equality Trust . is an independent, evidence-based campaign . Larry . Temkin. Larry . Temkin. Studied at UW Madison, Oxford, and Princeton. Currently chair of Philosophy at Rutgers. Central Question:. When is one situation worse than another with respect to inequality?. 1. The fact of rising wealth inequality.  . Increasing both nationally and globally.  . The wealthiest 1% of individuals has increased its share of national and global wealth.  . Estimated to own 48.2% of global assets. Professor Diane Elson. University of Essex UK. Presentation to Advanced Graduate Workshop. Initiative for Policy Dialogue. Bangalore January 2015. Inequality of . w. hat?. Preference satisfaction? . Dr Max Price. Vice-Chancellor. University of Cape Town. OUTLINE. Examine trends post-apartheid (since 1994). Income inequality. Overall, by race, by gender. Poverty . Overall, by race, by gender. Composition of income and impact of social grants. Chapter 11. “. Our world has never been more connected or more prosperous than it is today. Yet right now, one in every three of us alive today does not have access to the most basic needs for a decent life - food, education, medical care, a safe environment.. Mike Savage. The ‘inequality space’ . Concerns about inequality have dramatically surged into public interest over past decade, led by economists Stiglitz, Atkinson, Piketty.. Considerable academic investment in cross-disciplinary research in this area, . Causes and Consequences. Eshragh Motahar. Fall 2016. Introduction. What do we mean by inequality. Income (pre-tax, post-tax), Wealth. Is it inevitable. Historical context. What is new?. Why should we care about it . 1. Alan Berube. UNLV/Brookings Mountain West. April . 6, . 2016. 2. The Brookings Metro Program focuses on the well-being of major U.S. cities and . metros with . active . work in . 40 regions and states. David Bell, David Comerford and David Eiser. Overview. Inequality and social justice central to the independence debate. This paper considers the effectiveness of different policy levers in influencing inequality. Sam . Levitus. . and Professor David Schaffer. Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Background and Overview of Research.  . There has been much attention given to income inequality within the U.S. labor market, especially recently. From the huge amount of discussion and debate about wage inequality (from both the political left and the right), two salient points emerge: that the U.S. labor market shows a far more unequal distribution of wages than the labor markets of other developed countries, and that the overall U.S. wage structure has become dramatically more unequal over the past several decades. We were ill-equipped to investigate the first claim but sought to thoroughly analyze the second, paying particular attention to the components of wage inequality—and their relative importance—in recent years. To accomplish this, we performed several statistical analyses on survey data from the U.S. Census Bureau (we did not use any data from other countries for either analysis or comparison). Our results do indeed confirm the second claim; by every single measurement we used, wages are far more unequal today than they were in the past. In particular, the top few percentiles have made large gains over the past forty years, while most other workers’ wages have been nearly stagnant.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Inequality and e"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents