/
Macroalgae as an Indicator of Estuarine Condition Macroalgae as an Indicator of Estuarine Condition

Macroalgae as an Indicator of Estuarine Condition - PowerPoint Presentation

conchita-marotz
conchita-marotz . @conchita-marotz
Follow
397 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-22

Macroalgae as an Indicator of Estuarine Condition - PPT Presentation

Eric Milbrandt PhD Marine Laboratory SanibelCaptiva Conservation Foundation SCCF Caloosahatchee Science Workshop 2013 Florida Gulf Coast University 112013 Background Unattached macroalgae is a ID: 414898

growth offshore green g11 offshore growth g11 green biomass inshore seagrass g10 spp species rates macroalgae 2010 bay hypnea

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Macroalgae as an Indicator of Estuarine ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Macroalgae as an Indicator of Estuarine Condition

Eric Milbrandt, Ph.D. Marine LaboratorySanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation (SCCF)Caloosahatchee Science Workshop 2013Florida Gulf Coast University11/20/13Slide2

Background

“Unattached” macroalgae is a common component of seagrass communitiesProvides food and refuge for seagrass fauna (Virnstein and Carbonara 1985, Fry 1984)Has high levels of productivity (Williams 1977)Contributes to the DOC pool through decomposition (Zieman 1984)High levels of nutrition, little refractory carbon (Hermann 1994)Extensive drift algal abundances decrease the amount of available light in seagrass (William Cowper 1978, Montfrans 1984) Drift algal blooms decrease seagrass vertical shoot density in the presence of urchins (Macia 1999)

4/27/10, trawls in San Carlos Bay

12/6/10, near causewaySlide3

Occurrences of “Drift Algae”

Large accumulations after storms (Williams Cowper 1978) in Biscayne Bay (Josselyn 1977)

“Tumbling” in sparse seagrass in the IRL (

Virnstein

1985), up to 0.5 km/day (

Holmquest

1994)

10/19/13 Knapp’s Point after TS Karen

Initially attached to substrata such as seagrass shells rocks or

sponges and breaks

loose

Usually

non-calcified fleshy or filamentous, reproduce

vegetatively

(Norton & Matheison 1983)

12/15/12 Sanibel LighthouseSlide4

Previous studies in FL

LocationNo. of SpeciesGroups

Dominant

Species

Mean Biomass

Ft.

Pierce (Benz et al. 1979)

63

3 blue-green

12 green

9 brown

39 red

Acanthophora

spicifera

Chondria

tenuissima

Dictyota

dichotoma

Hypnea

spp

.

Spyridia

filamentosa

Giffordia

mitchelliae

Gracilaria

spp

.

Rosenvingea

intricate

1.8-8.7 g dry

wt

m

-2

Anclote estuary (Hamm

and

Humm

1976)

65

5 blue-green

15 green

13 brown

32

red

Laurencia

obtusa

L.Poteaui

Digenia

simplex

Sargassum

spp.

240 g dry

wt

m

-2

Mid-Indian River Lagoon (

Virnstein

and

Carbonara

1985)

-

-

Gracilaria

spp.

Spyridia

filamentosa

Jania

adhaerens

Rosenvingea

intricata

Acanthophora

spicifera

Laurencia

spp.

Cladophora

prolifera

Hypnea

spp.

Dictyota

dichtoma

0.03-164

g dry

wt

m

-2

San Carlos Bay

/Gulf of Mexico (Milbrandt 2010)

96

1 blue-green

12

green

20 brown

63 red

This presentation

0.01-224 g dry

wt

m

-2Slide5

Drivers

Eutrophication-Algal biomass linked to N-loadingWaquoit Bay Massachusetts, Gracilaria tikvahae (Valiela 1992)Bermuda, Caulerpa prolifera (Lapointe 1989)French Mediterranian coast, Ulva lactuca (Maze et al 1993)Sanibel Island, Hypnea, Soleria Dawes (2003)Slide6

Caloosahatchee versus other estuaries

200800Biomass g DW m-2

Dixon 2008 TN = 1,873 MT (1,873 X 10

3

kg) yr-1 Caloosahatchee

Biomass 100-200 g m

-2

not uncommon

What is the tipping point?

Valiela

(1997)Slide7
Slide8

Fragmentation

Hypnea fragment survival data support the proliferation that was observed in late 2006, early 2007Sanibel;02/21/07(Vermeij et al. 2009)Slide9

Significant differences in species composition and abundance at inshore vs. offshore locations

Common SpeciesSlide10

INSHORE

OFFSHORESlide11

INSHORE

OFFSHORE

2008-2010. Each point represents the mean biomass (n=20) Inshore CES11, near

Fishermans

Key; offshore is GOM12, 5 miles west of Redfish pass.Slide12

Aldridge and Trimmer (2005) Half saturation constants for green macroalgae (NO

3) 0.3 mg/L N. In: Anderson and Conley (2005)Ambrose EPA WASP models use 0.1 mg/L N half saturation for macroalgal external N uptake.Sufficient nutrients in the lower Caloosahatchee Estuary to support year round macroalagal growth. Slide13

Driver-Irradiance

Higher irradiances inshore from Dec. to May after N-loading.Offshore, high irradiances coincident with flows and loading

(SCCF, Ladyfinger

Lakes 4/1/13)Slide14

Driver-herbivory

Lack of inshore urchins?Slide15

Top Down Control

Evidence from panhandle that grazer abundance can control macroalgal proliferations (Heck and Valentine)Results from one offshore location with abundant grazers suggests some top down control at GOM04 (Coen et al. 2010) but low salinities prevent larval settlement in San Carlos Bay Slide16

Driver-Roughness

Benthic habitat maps(G. Foster 2010)Slide17

Driver-Temperature

Temperature had a significant affect on photosynthesis and daily growth, salinity did not (Brown, USF M.S. thesis 2001)Temperatures can be several degrees warmer in shallow sites (SCCF RECON data), growth rates from the field are needed. Slide18

Biomass and percent cover (

Scanlan 2009 framework), N-loading, residence time vs. growth ratesInshore and offshore locations needed to capture large (extreme)

interannual

differences in S79 flows

Improve CHNEP mapping by determining accuracy of SAV maps (patchy/continuous, with/without macroalgae)

Improves SAV indicators by providing additional drivers (space competition) and ecosystem services

Improves beach condition indicators (red tide, bacteria)

Methods and equipment proven and tested in the 2010 study

Indicator ConsiderationsSlide19

SCCF Current efforts

Growth and N uptake rates (ammonia, NOX, TN) of local speciesMeasure growth rates (or mortality rates) of beach collected drift algaeQuantify biomass and percent cover from a 4 shore-side locationsDevelop a key to common species in SW Florida Workshop with FDEP and others to teach the use of the keys to identify to macroalgae to Genus and improve transect monitoringSlide20

Growth Rates – field incubations

DateSpeciesVolumeWet Weight

Date

Volume

Wet Weight

10-23-13

Halymenia floresia

19 mL

14.91 g

11/6/13

17.6 mL

20.81 g

10-23-13

Agardhiela

subulata

16.8 mL

14.19 g

11/6/13

26 mL

23.24 g

10-24-13

Agardhiela subulata

40 mL

37.46 g

11/6/13

62 mL

62.73 g

10-24-13

Codium taylorii

102 mL

102.14 g

11/6/13

131 mL

135.35 g

10-24-13

Solieria

filiformis

1.8 mL

1.13 g

11/6/13

2 mL

1.29 g

10-24-13

Gracilaria tikvahiae

12 mL

12.79 g

11/6/13

12.1 mL

11.95 g

10-24-13

Botrycladia occidentalis

46 mL

46.67 g

11/6/13

71 mL

76.63 gSlide21

Acknowledgements

Drs. Loh, Parsons, Everham, A.J. Martignette, Jeff Siwicke, Brad Klement, Keleigh Provost, Mark Thompson, Drs. Greg Foster, Ray GrizzleFunding Partners:James Evans, City of SanibelSteve Boutelle, Lee County, WCINDRob Loflin, City of SanibelMike Campbell, Lee County