PPT-Refinements to techniques for verifying shape analysis inva

Kenneth Roe GBO Presentation 9302013 The Johns Hopkins University Summary Formal Methods for Imperative Languages Such as C Many bugs caused by corruption of data structures Use formal methods to document data structure invariants and then verify correct program execution. Anany. . Levitin. ACM . SIG. CSE 1999. O. utline. Introduction. Four General Design Techniques. A Test of Generality . Further Refinements. Conclusion. Introduction-1. According to many textbooks, a consensus seems to have evolved as to which approaches qualify as major techniques for designing algorithms.. Applications in orthopedics, and more…. * Images: Cates J, “Shape . Modelling. and Analysis with Entropy based Particle Systems,” PhD Thesis, University of Utah. Study of ‘Shape’. What questions can it answer ?. - Drawings must be 3D . -Use wire frames to make 3D crates. - Add . colour. and tone – but less is more. Remember the light source will come from one direction. -Add thick and thin lines to show depth.. . STORY. ANUJ SRIVASTAVA. Dept of Statistics. Florida State University. FRAMEWORK: WHAT CAN IT DO?. Pairwise . distances. between shapes. . Invariance. to nuisance groups (re-parameterization) and result in pairwise registrations.. 60% Proposed Plan. Classic industrial architecture. Define the space. Identify pedestrian/ vehicle conflicts. GOALS:. Design Refinements|West Plaza. 90. % Proposed Plan. Design Refinements|West Plaza. Shape Techniques Fred Park UCI iCAMP 2011 Outline 1. Overview and Shape Representation 2. Shape Descriptors: Shape Parameters 3. Shape Descriptors as 1D Functions (Dimension Reducing Signatures of s from Fourier to Wavelets. Ming . Zhong. 2012.9. Overview (1). Harmonic analysis basics. Represent signals as the linear combination of basic overlapping, wave-like functions. Natural domain (space/time). presented by. Greta . Yorsh. Shape Analysis . [Jones and . Muchnick. 1981]. Program analysis to determine all possible . shapes of . the heap at every program point. Applications. Compiler optimizations. Niki. Vazou. 1. , Patrick M. Rondon. 2. , and . Ranjit. Jhala. 1. 1. UC San Diego . 2. Google . 1. Vanilla Types. 12 :: . Int. 2. Refinement Types. 12 :: . {. . v: . Int. . |. v > 10. Oliver van . Kaick. 1,4 . . Kai . Xu. 2. . Hao. Zhang. 1. . Yanzhen. Wang. 2. . Shuyang. Sun. 1. Ariel Shamir. 3. Daniel Cohen-Or. 4. 4. Tel Aviv University. 1. Simon . Fraser University. towards functionality. Ruizhen. Hu. 1. . . Oliver van Kaick. 2. Youyi. Zheng. 3. . . Manolis. Savva. 4. 2. . Carleton University. 1 . Shenzhen University. 3. . ShanghaiTech. the . ADF engage in a ‘Narrative . W. ar’? . How do we balance operational security and legitimate press oversight?. Is ‘image sensitivity’ and casualty . privacy an ‘Achilles heel’? . Responding to ‘Decreasing Control’. Dagstuhl. - Typing, Analysis, and Verification of Heap-Manipulating Programs – July 24, 2009. Xavier Rival. INRIA and ENS. . Paris. Bor-Yuh Evan Chang. University of Colorado,. . Boulder. If some of the symbols are garbled, try either installing . Daniel Hodges, Tara Seymour, Emily Spurlin, and Rebecca Alexander. Department of Chemistry, Wake Forest University. Figure 4. . Schematic of structure reactions. 1M7 is added to flexible hydroxyl groups of the RNA and relative reactivity is measured so that structure can be deduced. Mortimer .