/
Seasonality of influenza Seasonality of influenza

Seasonality of influenza - PowerPoint Presentation

conchita-marotz
conchita-marotz . @conchita-marotz
Follow
414 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-13

Seasonality of influenza - PPT Presentation

Analysis of seasonality To understand what is normal To anticipate influenza increase To vaccinate at the right time To group countries with similar patterns When to vaccinate Systematic literature review of seasonality in the tropics and subtropics NIVEL ID: 558993

activity influenza time data influenza activity data time countries flunet year positive cases analysis nivel seasonality series flu cdc

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Seasonality of influenza" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Seasonality of influenza Slide2

Analysis of seasonalityTo understand what is normalTo anticipate influenza increase To vaccinate at the right timeTo group countries with similar patternsSlide3

When to vaccinate?Systematic literature review of seasonality in the tropics and subtropics (NIVEL)CDC, PATH, NIVEL, WHOMultiple data sources (

FluNet, National Surveillance data)Different seasons: 2002 - 2015 (excluded 2009-10)Different inclusion / exclusion criteriaDifferent statistical approachesweekly prop. of positive cases over

all positive cases for influenza within that

year

weekly prop.

of samples testing positive for

influenza

Time series analysis

Binomial model: log(p

/(1-p)) = year +

month

Different

thresholds to define increased flu activity / year-round

activitySlide4

Different methods looking for seasonality combinedPATH: Weekly proportion of positive cases over all positive cases for influenza within that year.

NIVEL: FluNet: Eyeballing to identify months with high, low and no influenza activity in FluNetCDC: Weekly proportion of samples testing positive for influenza. Binomial model to predict the monthly flu activity as a factor of historical monthly and yearly activity –Also analysed whether peak flu % positivity occurred during similar months each year

.

WHO

Time

Series analysis. Missing values in time series replaced with either 0 or moving average (imputation). Time series plot (observed and imputed) to check if imputation makes sense. Autocorrelation function plot to display dependency between time points.

.Slide5

Lao PDR

 No. of peaks

Primary period of increased influenza activity

Secondary period of increased influenza activity

Seasons analysed

Data source

Lao PDR

1

Sep-Nov

 

 

 

CDC

 

 

 

 

 

NIVEL

1

Sep-Nov

 

2011-2013

FluNet

PATH

1

Sep-Nov

 

2010-2014

FluNet

WHO

1

Oct Nov

 

2010-2014

FluNet

Published

1

Aug-Dec

 

2008-2011

ILISlide6

Influenza peaksSummary of seasonality analysis by CDC, NIVEL, PATH, WHO and published literatureSlide7

Start month of primary periodNo. of peaks

Summary of seasonality analysis by CDC, NIVEL, PATH, WHO and published literature

North Brazil (Mar-Apr);

South Brazil (May-Jun)

Exception - JamaicaSlide8

Proposed influenza vaccination zone(Americas)Summary of seasonality analysis by CDC, NIVEL, PATH, WHO and published literatureSlide9

Influenza vaccination zonesSummary of seasonality analysis by CDC, NIVEL, PATH, WHO and published literatureSlide10

Further refinement for the transmission zonesInfluenza transmission zones were created by World Health Organization (WHO) present epidemiological and virological trends and monitor seasonal influenza activity

Current zones are based on UN regions (with WHO adaptations). Since the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, enhanced surveillance has allowed for better characterization of influenza circulation over time. Systematic assessments elucidated the need to explore re-grouping countries in zones supported by similar epidemiological patterns of transmission. Slide11

WHO Transmission ZonesSlide12

ObjectiveSystematic assessments (biweekly) elucidated re-grouping needRe-examine current WHO transmission zones and assess the concordance of seasonality in countries within and in adjacent zones. Slide13

Methods Country-level virological data were extracted from FluNetFrom 2011 to 2015 (exclusion of 2009/2010 season)

Excluded countries with less than 100 crude virus detections/year Examination of influenza type A and B collectivelyEPIPOIEpidemiological Parameter Investigation from Population Observations InterfaceOpen source time series analysis softwareGives seasonal parameters (timing and magnitude of annual peaks in a time series

A time-series hierarchical clustering analysis using average linkage

Geographically contiguous clusters were generated based on the synchrony of seasonality. Slide14
Slide15

All Influenza typesSlide16

South America ResultsSlide17

ResultsSouthern Asia/South-East Asia[People’s Republic of Lao, Nepal, India, Bhutan], [Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia], [Thailand, Philippines, Cambodia, Viet Nam]

Eastern Asia[China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mongolia]Western Asia[Egypt, Pakistan, Iran (Islamic Republic of)] Georgia currently in Western Asia clustered closely with Eastern Europe countriesSouth America

[Mexico, Jamaica, Guatemala] clustered with countries in North AmericaSlide18

ConclusionsResults were in concordance with recently analyzed vaccination zones in tropical countries. Analysis based on countries with available data Should be re-evaluated as more countries report on influenza activity.

Data-driven recommendations should supplement climate dataSlide19

LimitationsNational representativenessMay mask subregional variability in seasonality patternsExtrapolation to neighbouring countries with inadequate dataSlide20

SummaryTime of vaccination is determined by seasonality analysis for a country / regionWHO will reorder the transmission zones National input will be asked before final adjustment

Slide21

AcknowledgementsNICs, WHO CCsEduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Lizette Durand

Laura Newman, Niranjan BhatJohn PagetSiddhi Hirve, Lucia Soetens

, Thedi Ziegler, Wenqing Zhang and GIP colleagues

Saba Qasmieh

All that I might have forgottenSlide22

 

PATH

NIVEL

CDC

WHO

Data source /

Seasons

analysed

FluNet

: 2010

– 2015, 131 countries

FluNet

: 2010 – 2014, 131

countries.

National

surveillance data: 2000 – 2014, 18 countries

FluNet

, PAHO, Nat surveillance data: 2002

– 2014, 16 countries of Central and South America

FluNet

. 2010

– 2014, 131 countries

Inclusion

Lab

confirmed data

Lab

confirmed data

Lab

confirmed data.

Lab

confirmed data

Exclusion

2009

2010

Season

with

less

than 50 influenza cases

/ year

2009-2010

Season

with

<10

specimens per

week (

FluNet

)

Season

with

<50 flu

cases

or

<20

consecutive weeks of reported data (National surveillance data)

2009

2010

Less

than 10 samples tested each month

2009

2010

Year

with less than 100 influenza positive casesSlide23

 

PATH

NIVEL

CDC

WHO

Approach used

Weekly

proportion of positive cases over all positive cases for influenza within that year

.

FluNet

:

Eyeballing to identify months

with high, low and no influenza activity

in

FluNet

.

National

surveillance data: Data were pooled on a monthly basis and a case proportion (i.e. a monthly proportion of samples testing positive for influenza) was

calculated

Weekly

proportion of samples testing positive for influenza

.

Binomial model to predict the monthly

flu

activity as a factor of historical monthly and yearly activity

Also

analysed whether peak

flu % positivity

occurred during similar months each year.

Time Series analysis.

Missing values in time series replaced with either 0 or moving average (imputation). Time

series plot (observed and imputed) to check if imputation makes sense. Autocorrelation function plot to display dependency between time points.Slide24

 

PATH

NIVEL

CDC

WHO

Criteria to define peak / period of increased influenza activity

Month with 10% or more of total yearly cases of influenza for two or more

years.

Second set of increased

flu

activity separated by 2 or more months of non-peak activity.

FluNet

:

Eye-balling

to define

months

with high levels of

activity.

National

surveillance data: Peak defined as week with highest no. of cases. If highest no.

in 2

or more

weeks, peak defined as the central week of the 3-wk or 5-wk period with the highest no. of

cases

. Then counted the no. of times the peak occurred in each month of the year. The monthly proportion of samples testing positive for

flu

was used to identify months which had high levels of

flu

activity.

Predicted

flu

activity exceeded the annual median proportion of positive cases for at least 2 consecutive months. Start

and end of

epidemic defined as the first month when activity exceeded

and remained below the annual

median proportion

.

Time -series analysis to define peak.

Decomposed the

time series into seasonal, trend and residual components.Slide25

 

PATH

NIVEL

CDC

WHO

Criteria to define year-round activity

Eight or more months of increased flu activity, or 3 or more peaks of influenza activity each separated by at least 2 months

Influenza was on average identified each month of the year

Influenza was on average identified each month of the year