W hos 1 Jonathon Peterson Purdue University The Ranking Problem Why is ranking of sports teams important College football BCS College basketball NCAA tournament Win 1 billion ID: 323567
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The mathematics of ranking sports teams" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The mathematics of ranking sports teamsWho’s #1?
Jonathon PetersonPurdue UniversitySlide2
The Ranking ProblemWhy is ranking of sports teams important?College football – BCSCollege basketball – NCAA tournament
Win $1 billion!!!http://www.quickenloansbracket.com/What is so hard about ranking teams?Strength of schedule matters.
Non
-transitive property
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.comSlide3
Ivy League Football - 2009What is the best team?
Is Dartmouth better than Yale?Slide4
Ranking MethodsStatistical MethodsGather as much data as possibleCook up a good predicting function
ExamplesJeff SagarinRPIProblemsad-hoc techniques
Dependent on parametersSlide5
Ranking MethodsMathematical methodsRanking based on a mathematical modelMinimize ad-hoc choicesBased on simple principles
ExamplesColley matrixMassey’s methodGeneralized point-difference rankingSlide6
Colley Matrix Rankinghttp://www.colleyrankings.com
Team
i
Data:
Schedule Data:
Only simple statistics needed (wins, losses, & schedule)
Doesn’t depend on margin of victory
Does include strength of scheduleSlide7
Colley Matrix MethodRanking
SOS Adjustment
Keep iterating and hope for convergenceSlide8
Iteration – Simple ExampleTwo teams and one game (team 1 wins)Slide9
Iteration – Simple Example
Iteration
r1
r2
0
0.500000
0.500000
1
0.666667
0.333333
2
0.611111
0.388889
3
0.629630
0.370370
4
0.623457
0.376543
5
0.625514
0.374486
6
0.624829
0.375171
7
0.625057
0.374943
8
0.624981
0.375019
9
0.625006
0.374994
10
0.624998
0.375002Slide10
Colley Matrix - Solution
Two equations:Slide11
Solution – Simple ExampleTwo teams and one game (team 1 wins)
Matrix Form SolutionSlide12
Ivy League Football - 2009
Team
Colley Rating
Penn
.792
Harvard
.625
Columbia
.583
Princeton
.583
Brown
.542
Dartmouth
.375
Cornell
.250
Yale
.250
What is the best team?
Is Dartmouth better than Yale?Slide13
Massey Rating Method
http://www.masseyratings.com
Ratings should predict score differential
rating of the
-
th
team
If
team
plays team
, want
n
et point difference to be
12 equations with 8 variables
- unique solution?
Slide14
Massey – linear algebra formulation
# teams = n, # total games = mm x n matrix
Vector
Rating vector
In k-
th
game team
team
beats team
.
,
, and
if
margin of victory
Massey equation:
No unique solution – instead try to minimize
Slide15
Massey – Least squaresWant to minimize
Try
???
is not invertible
Add condition that
New least squares problem
Slide16Slide17
Ivy League Football - 2009
Team
Massey Rating
Penn
25.25
Harvard
10.75
Columbia
0
Princeton
-3
Brown
-3.75
Yale
-7
Cornell
-11
Dartmouth
-11.25
What is the best team?
Is Dartmouth better than Yale?Slide18Slide19
Colley – Massey comparison
Team
Massey Rating
Penn
25.25
Harvard
10.75
Columbia
0
Princeton
-3
Brown
-3.75
Yale
-7
Cornell
-11
Dartmouth
-11.25
Team
Colley Rating
Penn
.792
Harvard
.625
Columbia
.583
Princeton
.583
Brown
.542
Dartmouth
.375
Cornell.250Yale
.250Slide20
Another Ranking Method
“A Natural Generalization of the Win-Loss Rating System.”Charles Redmond,
Mercyhurst
College
Mathematics Magazine, April 2003.
Compare teams through strings of comparisons
Yale vs. Columbia
Columbia is 14 better than Brown
Brown is 14 better than Yale
So… Columbia is 28 better than Yale
Columbia is 20 worse than Harvard
Harvard is 4 better than Yale
So… Columbia is 16 worse than Yale
Average of two comparisons: Columbia is 6 better than YaleSlide21
Average Dominance
TeamAverage DominanceA
2.33
B
2.67
C
-3.33
D
-1.67
Team
Average Dominance
A
3.5
B
4
C
-5
D
-2.5
Average margin of victory
Add self-comparisonsSlide22
Second Generation DominanceAvg. 2nd Generation Dominance
Team
Dominance
2
nd
Gen. Dominance
A
2.33
3.44
B
2.67
3.22
C
-3.33
-4.11
D
-1.67
-2.56Slide23
Connection to Linear Algebra
Adjacency Matrix
Dominance VectorSlide24
Limiting DominanceSlide25
Limiting DominanceSlide26
Ivy League Football - 2009
Team
Dominance Rating
Penn
24.34
Harvard
10.06
Columbia
-0.09
Brown
-2.84
Princeton
-2.91
Yale
-7.13
Dartmouth
-10.56
Cornell
-10.88
What is the best team?
Is Dartmouth better than Yale?Slide27
ConclusionLinear Algebra can be useful!Matrices can make things easier.Complex Rankings, with simple methods.
Methods aren’t perfect.What ranking is “best”?