PPT-Accuracy and Completeness

of molecular linelists H 2 O NH 3 and CO 2 CO H 3 HCN Oleg L Polyansky and Jonathan Tennyson 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London London WC1E 6BT . 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 1 Measured Value of x Fraction of Total Measurements SD 01 SD 02 SD 03 brPage 5br mean standard deviation histogram Figure 3 Mass of Unknown Sample 102 104 106 108 11 112 114 116 118 12 Mass kg of Measurements brPage 6br Krylov. . s. ubspace . m. ethods . Erin Carson and James . Demmel. Householder Symposium XIX. June 8-13, 2014, Spa, Belgium. 2. Model Problem: 2D . Poisson on . grid. , . . .. . Equilibration . (diagonal scaling) used. . Chapter . 15. Consistency. Evaluate the approaches. Evaluate the data. Range of values. Reconciliation. Rounding the answer. Significant digits. Technical review. Value conclusion. Value indication. 2. Chapter . 15. Consistency. Evaluate the approaches. Evaluate the data. Range of values. Reconciliation. Rounding the answer. Significant digits. Technical review. Value conclusion. Value indication. 2. Paul Gibson. Hardinsburg Baptist Church. Revelation Bible Study . #2. Bible Study Rules. No question is too dumb to ask. Please engage (you will get out of this class what you put into it). Please do not expect me to know everything. Conciseness . Consideration . Clarity . Concreteness . Courtesy . Correctness. Seven C’s of Effective Communication. Course Objectives. Explain What makes Communication Ineffective. Describe the Components of Communication Process. Chapter . 15. Consistency. Evaluate the approaches. Evaluate the data. Range of values. Reconciliation. Rounding the answer. Significant digits. Technical review. Value conclusion. Value indication. 2. 1. NP-Completeness . Proofs. Presentation for use with the textbook, . Algorithm Design and Applications. , by M. T. Goodrich and R. Tamassia, Wiley, 2015. © 2015 Goodrich and Tamassia . NP-Completeness Proofs. Andrew B. Kahng, . Seokhyeong Kang . VLSI CAD LABORATORY, . UC. San Diego. 49. th. Design Automation Conference. June 6. th. , 2012. Outline. Background and Motivation. Accuracy Configurable Adder Design. Session #35. Dr. . Qassim . Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc.. Pierre Le Roux, Aerometric, Inc.. Becky Morton, . Towill. , Inc.. 1. New ASPRS . Positional Accuracy Standards for . Digital Geospatial . Data. Drafting Committee:. CONTEXT. There are two . contexts precision . and accuracy apply to: sets of data, and measuring instruments.. In a set of data, those measures give an idea of the spread and “. ballpark. ” of the answer (final measurement).. Friday. , September 2. nd. , 2016. Accuracy . vs. Precision –. Accuracy. – how close a measurement is to the actual value. Precision. – how close a group of measurements are to each other.. Look at each target below and decide whether the situation is accurate, precise, both, or neither:. InventoryStrategiesDemand Planning LLC03/25/2009Revised April 30 201826 Henshaw Street Woburn MA 01801 wwwdemandplanningnet1By Mark Chockalingam PhDForecast Accuracy -AbstractDemand visibilityis Goal: . Perform kinematic calibration of Galen surgical robot and integrate results into software to improve its accuracy. Background: . Robot is very precise, but manufacturing tolerances reduce accuracy..