/
Atomic Theory Chapter 4 Atomic Theory Atomic Theory Chapter 4 Atomic Theory

Atomic Theory Chapter 4 Atomic Theory - PowerPoint Presentation

danika-pritchard
danika-pritchard . @danika-pritchard
Follow
427 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-13

Atomic Theory Chapter 4 Atomic Theory - PPT Presentation

Science is based off of observations A Scientific Law is a summary of what is seen in observations A Scientific Theory is an explanation of why these observations are occurring Both laws and theories are tested by using them to predict what would happen in certain situations ID: 689500

particles model atoms electron model particles electron atoms nucleus electrons mass atom elements matter atomic orbits negative positive theory

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Atomic Theory Chapter 4 Atomic Theory" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Atomic Theory

Chapter

2Slide2

Atomic Theory

Science is based off of observations.

A Scientific Law is a summary of what is seen in observations.

A Scientific Theory is an explanation of why these observations are occurring.

Both laws and theories are tested by using them to predict what would happen in certain situations.Slide3

Atomic Theory

-Explains why all matter acts as it does because it is composed of tiny particles called atoms, the basic building blocks of all matter

First theorized by Democritus ~400 BC in ancient Greece.

He thought that matter could NOT be divided infinitely. You had to reach a smallest possible piece. He named this piece an atom, which meant indivisible or can’t be cut.Slide4

More Democritus

He and his followers, atomists, said atoms were small hard particles all made of the same material, but different sizes and shapes.

They were also always moving and capable of joining together.

Since this was ancient Greece, He and the atomists had no way of ever proving his theories and few people believed it.Slide5

Elements and Compounds

Lots of research through alchemy went into different substances.

Pure substances that could be broken down into smaller substances were called

compounds

.

Pure substances that couldn’t be broken down were called

elements

.Slide6

Law of Conservation of Mass

A chemical reaction does not change the mass of the matter present.

The mass of the reactants is equal to the mass of the products.

This is true even if a different phase of matter is created

.

This is also called

Lavoisier’s

law

Developed in the lat

e 1780’sSlide7

Law of definite proportions

1790’s

All

pure compounds have exactly the same proportions by mass of elements regardless of size

Water is always 2 hydrogen atoms to every 1 oxygen atom

By mass that is 2 (g) H : 16 (g) O Slide8

Dalton’s Model (1803)

people started to accept the idea of atoms because of his experiments

He worked with gases and found that they acted as though they were made of solid microscopic particles

all elements are made of atoms (indivisible and indestructible)

atoms of the same element are exactly alike

atoms of different elements are different

compounds are formed by joining two or more

elementsSlide9

Law of multiple proportions

Also

known as Dalton’s

Law

The same elements may combine differently to form different compounds.

Hydrogen and oxygen may make water, but they also may make hydrogen peroxide.

Atoms may join together in different manors.Slide10

John DaltonSlide11

Thomson’s Cathode RaySlide12

Thomson’s Model (1897)

found negative particles could come from neutral elements

atom is made of smaller things (+ & -), and is divisible

successfully separated negative particles (electrons) but could not separate the positive particle (protons)

“plum pudding model” negative particles floating in a positively charged gel like materialSlide13

Plum Pudding Model- Thomson

Positive Gel

Negative

ParticlesSlide14

Sir J. J. Thomson

The sir means

he was knightedSlide15

Rutherford’s Model (1911)

fired protons at a sheet of gold foil most went through unaffected, some bounced away

there is a small dense area of positive particles at the center of the atom- the nucleus

electrons are scattered near the outside of the atom with mostly empty space between the nucleus and the electronsSlide16

Gold Foil Experiment

Radioactive source

Gold foilSlide17

Rutherford’s Model

nucleus

(small dense

positive area)

electrons

Empty SpaceSlide18

Ernest RutherfordSlide19

Bohr Model (1913)

electrons move in definite orbits around the nucleus

these orbits or energy levels are located at certain distances from the nucleus Slide20

Bohr’s Model

nucleus

ElectronsSlide21

Neils BohrSlide22

Wave Model (present day)

based on complex math equations

orbits are more complex than originally thought

de Broglie

stated that electrons (particles) have

wave properties

, and he viewed these as standing waves, like those produce when a guitar string is plucked (classical physics.)

Schrodinger

assumed that the electron in Hydrogen behaves as a standing wave.

Slide23

Wave Model (continued)

When Schrodinger’s equation is analyzed, many solutions are found.

Each solution represents an atomic orbital.

An

atomic orbital

is the most

probable

location for finding an electron.Slide24

What is an orbital?

It is not a Bohr orbit (not moving in a circular path.)

How is the electron moving?

We don’t know!

There is a fundamental limitation to just how precisely we can know both the position and momentum of a particle at a given time

Slide25

This is kind of how we assume an electron travels

e

-Slide26

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

The more accurately we know the particle’s position, the less accurately we can know it momentum and vice versa.

We can’t know the exact motion of the electron around the nucleus.

The area that an electron orbits is called an “electron cloud”Slide27

Louis de Broglie Erwin SchrodingerSlide28

Werner Heisenberg