/
BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL for challenge BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL for challenge

BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL for challenge - PDF document

danika-pritchard
danika-pritchard . @danika-pritchard
Follow
413 views
Uploaded On 2015-06-13

BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL for challenge - PPT Presentation

People v Jewett Wend 314 But if the state law itself should exclude certain classes on the bona fide ground that it was for the good of the community that their regular work should not be interrupted there is nothing in the Fourteenth Amendment to p ID: 85479

People Jewett Wend

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

--com­ . our must non­ tIl or,tionsidutyrail­teinndiseiatatlesis ltion.their theiricom­ vould pilotslVould f the ;;that{L Iperly ., BIENNIALREPORTOFTHEATTORNEYGENERAL711andprepareataxmanualforuseofthetaxingofficials,requiresthatsuchmanual"providethatplattedlandsunsoldaslotsshallbevaluedfortaxassessmentpurposesonthesamebasisasun­plattedacreageofsimilarcharacter,until60%ofsuchlandsincludedinoneplatshallhavebeensoldasindividuallots."(Em­phasissupplied.)Thisprovisioncameintothestatutesasapartof§22,Ch.22079,1943.Thelanguageofthesaidstatutorypro­visionseemstomakeitapplicableto"plattedlandsunsoldaslots,"whichseemstoexcludeplattedlandssold as lots.Thelanguageofthestatuteseemstorequirethatthe 'unsold portionofplattedlandsbeassessedasunplattedlandssolongasmorethan60%ofthelandsremainsunsold;thisprovisionofthestatutedoesnotexpresslyprohibittheassessmentofthelotssoldasplattedlands.Theabovequestionis,therefore,answeredintheaffirmative.However,noconstitutionalquestionsconcerningthesaidsectionofthestatutehavebeenconsidered,assuchquestionsarelefttothecourts.056-191-July2,1956 lHUNICIP ALITIESFRANCHISEFORINSTALLATIONANDOPERATIONOFWATERSYSTEM-RIGHTOFMUNICIPALITYTOPURCHASEFACILITIESUPONEXPIRATIONOFFRANCHISE-§167.22,F.S.,CH.9833,1923ANDCH.15337,1931To:F.Casper,Vice-Mayor,MelbourneBeachQUESTION:Shouldafranchisegrantedbyamunicipalitytoanothermunicipalityfortheinstallationandoperationofawatersystemprovidethatthegrantorofthefran­chiseshall,upontheexpirationofthefranchise,havetherighttopurchasethewaterworksorotherpropertyusedinconnectionwithsuchfranchise?ThetownofMelbourneBeachappearstohavebeenorganizedandcreatedasamunicipalcorporation(§1,Ch.9833,1923).WefindnosubsequentactabolishingsaidmunicipalityanditisourassumptionthatthetownofMelbourneBeachisoperatingunderthechartergrantedinsaidCh.9833,asamendedbyCh.15337,1931.Section167.22,F.S.,provides:"167.22Termforwhichfranchise may begranted;conditions.-Nomunicipalityinthestateshallgiveorgrantanyfranchiseorrighttouseanystreetforthepurposeofoperatingalongoracrossthe same anystreetrailroad,waterworks,telephone, gas orelectricbusinessorotherbusinessrequiringtheuseofmains,pipesorwiresinanystreet,foranytermexceeding30years;orwith­ out reservingtherightandrequiringthegranteeofsuchfranchiseorright,asaconditionprecedentofthetaking 710BIENNIALREPORTOFTHEATTORNEYGENERALforchallengetothearray,ifasufficientnumberofun­exceptionablepersonsarepresent.Peoplev.Jewett,3Wend.314.Butifthestatelawitselfshouldexcludecertainclassesonthebonafidegroundthatitwasforthegoodofthecommunitythattheirregularworkshouldnotbeinterrupted,thereisnothingintheFourteenthAmendmenttopreventit.Theexemptionoflawyers,ministersofthegospel,doctors,andengineersofrail­roadtrains,inshortsubstantiallytheexemptioncom­plainedof,isofoldstandingandnotuncommonintheU.S.ItcouldnotbedeniedthattheStateproperlycouldhaveexcludedtheseclasseshaditseenfit,andthatun­deniablepropositionendsthecase."(TheitalicizedwordsareitalicizedintheU.S.supremecourt'sopinion.)IfindnothinginthestatutesofFloridawhichexemptscom­mercialairlinepilotsfromjuryservice.Nevertheless,ourstatutesdonotrequirethatallnon-exemptqualifiedpersonsmustbeputonjurylists;nordotheyrequirethateveryclassofnon­exemptpersonsberepresentedonajurylisteventhoughallorapartofsuchclassofpersonspossessthenecessaryqualificationsforjuryservice.Section40.08(2),F.S.,exemptsfromjurydutyallsuperintendents,engineersandtraindispatchersofanyrail­roadinoperation.Sincethelastamendmentofsaidstatutein1941,travelandtransportationofthemailsandofmerchandiseoncommercialairlineshasincreasedmanytimesover,sothatatthepresenttimetheregularoperationofcommercialairlinesiscommonlyconsideredindispensabletotheeconomyofthenation.Commercialairlinescan'toperateanymoreefficientlywiththeirpilotsabsentonjurydutythanrailroadscanoperatewiththeirengineersservingasjurors,andIholdtheviewthatjurycom­missionersorcountycommissionersmakingupjurylistswouldbejustifiedinomittingthenamesofallcommercialairlinepilotsuponthebonafidegroundthatitisprobablethatthejudgewouldexcusethemfromserviceupontheirapplicationbecauseofthecharacteroftheirbusiness;andthatsuchomissionuponthatbonafidegroundwouldbelawful.Therefore,itismyopinionthatyourquestionisproperlyansweredintheaffirmative.056-190-July2,1956TAXATIONUNIFORMITYOFASSESSMENTS-LOTSOFSUBDIVISIONWHERELESSTHANGO%SOLD-§192.31,F.S.To:RayE.Green,StateComptrolle1',TallahasseeQUESTION;Wherealotinasubdivisionhasbeensoldtoanindividual,firmorcorporation,maythesamebevaluedasplattedlandsolongasless.than60%ofthelandsintheplatremainsunsoldasindividuallots?Section192.31,F.S.,whichprovidesthatthestatecomptrol­ler,underthesupervisionofthestatebudgetcommission;compile