Theories Geoff Goodman PhD I The Relational Orientation Psychoanalytic encounter coconstructed between two active participants mutuality Humans are motivated by seeking objects not discharging drives ID: 527205
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Interpersonal-Relational" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Interpersonal-Relational Theories
Geoff Goodman, Ph.D.Slide2
I. The Relational Orientation
Psychoanalytic encounter co-constructed between two active participants (mutuality)
Humans are motivated by seeking objects, not discharging drives
Patients perceive and interpret “real” as well as “distorted” aspects of therapist in transference
Therapist self-disclosures produce more openness and trust in therapeutic relationshipSlide3
Continued…
E. Authoritarianism is replaced with an approximation of egalitarianism
F. Focus of treatment shifts from exploration of patient’s fantasies to exploration of mutual enactments (1-person to 2-person psychology)
G. Both transference and countertransference are mutually constructed (perspectivism, not absolutism) Slide4
Continued…
H. Recent evidence for 2-person psychology from time-series analysis conducted by Jones and Josephs
I. Focus on here and now in transference rather than reconstruction of past through retrieval of memories
J. Attention paid to both interpersonal and intrapsychic realms of human experience (i.e., intersubjective) Slide5
Continued…
K. Sexuality and aggression are inherently relational
constructs--response
to external and internal objects
L. Reciprocal influence between interpersonal processes and
intrapsychic
relational processes (transactional model)Slide6
II. Theory of Development
Lack of emphasis on development because of focus on here and now rather than there and then
Organizational schemes emerging sequentially (Ogden, 1989)
1.
autistic-contiguous
2.
paranoid-schizoid
Slide7
Continued…
3. historical modes which vary according to four domains
a. articulation of
self-other
boundaries
b. split vs. whole object relations
c. quality of reality testing
d. awareness of irreversibility of
time--repetition
compulsion Slide8
C. Four basic modes of relationality (Mitchell, 2000)
non- reflective
presymbolic
behavior-
-reciprocal
behavioral influence and mutual regulation
affective permeability-
-shared
experience of intense affect across permeable boundaries
organization of experience into
self-other
configurations
intersubjectivity
-
-mutual
recognition of self-reflective agentsSlide9
D. Major theoretical formulations placed among these four basic modes of
relationality
1. attachment theory-
-mode
1
2. object relations theory of Fairbairn/
Kernberg
-
-mode
3
3. relational theory of Ogden and
Bollas
-
-mode
2
4.
intersubjective
and psychoanalytic feminist theory-
-mode
4Slide10
III. Theory of Psychopathology
Attachment to “bad” (i.e., unsatisfying or unavailable) objects (see Fairbairn)
Psychopathology is the product of defense, not developmental arrest
1. relationship conflict-
-babyish
self considered safety strategy
2. not
unconflicted
arrested self-
-babyish
self considered lacking in recognition and mirroring
3. developmental arrest privileges needs of earliest developmental periods over current relationship needsSlide11
Continued…
C. Mental health-
-flexibility
to experience different relationships in different ways
D. Familiarity causes people to cling to pathological patterns
E. Modes of engagement become adaptive and maladaptive relationship templates for subsequent encounters
1. effectiveness in avoiding anxiety
2. fear of loss of contact with self and others if surrendered
3. conflicts arise between specific relational configurations and predominant self-shaping relational patternsSlide12
IV. Theory of Treatment
Entering into the subjective world of the patient and becoming part of his or her relational world
Broadening the structure of the patient’s relational world beyond confines of childhood constraintsSlide13
Continued…
C. Therapeutic change
1
. not through interpretation
2. through expanded participation of the analyst in the patient’s experiential world
3. therapist participation takes place whether interpreting or remaining silent
4. therapy is the experience cure, not the talking cure
5. observation is always contextual, not objectiveSlide14
V. Pioneers of Relational Theory
Sandor
Ferenczi
broke from Freudian tradition near the end of his life.
first developed the idea of mutual participation of analyst and patient
returned to Freud’s first theory of psychopathology-
-seduction
theory
psychopathology originates in abuse and its denial
technical neutrality of analysis repeats the trauma of parental code of silence (denial) Slide15
Continued…
4. modifications of analytic technique
a. engage in “real” relationship with patients to counteract phoniness of parental relationships
b. make up for deficits in loving by loving patients more authentically then parents did
c. privilege of experience over interpretation and remembering of early experience
d. experiments with mutual analysis
1) mutuality--different roles
2) symmetry--same rolesSlide16
B. Otto Rank
also broke from Freudian tradition
first developed the idea of birth trauma
separation from mother traumatic
fundamental conflict falls along a continuum
wish for separation, autonomy, life, individuality (Bowlby’s exploratory system)
wish for merger, dependence, death, loss of self, return to womb (Bowlby’s attachment system)Slide17
Continued…
c. therapist encourage psychological birth through acts of will
d. restoration of confidence activates will and produces individuality
e. acts of merger can produce creativity
3. both
Ferenczi
and Rank represent two ends of continuum
a.
Ferenczi
--mutuality
, merger, and intimacy
b.
Rank--autonomy
, separation, and individualitySlide18
VI. Critique of Relational Theory
No
theory
of
preexperiential
needs that motivate relationships
Psychopathology occurs only out of impingements upon a maturational pathway
No taxonomy of diagnostic classification of psychopathology
A
perspectivist
position cannot simultaneously privilege relational interventions over others
Relational therapist sacrifices his or her position as an older, wiser secure base