Lecture 5 Aristotles Ontology The Structure of Reality Part II Cosmocentric Philosophy Moscow State Institute of International Relations MGIMOUniversity School of Government and International Affairs ID: 914759
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Basics of Philosophy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Basics of Philosophy
Lecture 5Aristotle’s OntologyThe Structure of Reality
Part IICosmocentric Philosophy
Moscow State Institute
of International Relations (MGIMO-University
)
School of Government and International Affairs
& Alexander Shishkin
Department of Philosophy
Slide2Aristotle’s Ontology
The Structure of Reality Criticism of Plato’s Theory of IdeasTerminological Shortcomings
Logical Shortcomings Philosophical Shortcomings Aristotle’s Main Ontological Doctrines
The Doctrine of Matter and Form: Hylomorphism
The Doctrine of Potentiality
and Actuality
The Doctrine of Causation: The Four Types of Causes
The Material Cause
The Formal Cause
The Efficient Cause
The Final Cause
The Being and Its Kinds:
The Ten Categories
Slide3Aristotle
Miletus
Ephesus
Elea
Abdera
Athens
S
tagira
Croton
Samos
Slide4Aristotle’s OntologyThe Structure of Reality
The MetaphysicsOn the SoulThe OrganonPhysics
The Nicomachean EthicsThe PoliticsThe PoeticsThe Rhetoric
Aristotle
(384
–
322
B.C.
)
Principal Writings
Slide5Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Ideas
Terminological ShortcomingsUnsatisfactory terminologyThe confusing expression of
sharing inThe unclear notion of
pattern and the metaphor of imitation
(copy)
Logical Shortcomings
Inconsistencies in the application of the term
idea
Ideas of non-natural objects
(
e.g. objects created by art
)
Ideas of negations
Ideas of perishable things
Ideas of relations
Predication of ideas
The “third man” argument
Ideas of ideas
Philosophical Shortcomings
The duplication
/ multiplication
of reality
The separation of substances from thingsThe irrelevancy of unchanging ideas to the natural world of change
Slide6Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Ideas
Terminological Shortcomings… all other things cannot come from the Forms in any of the usual senses of
“from”. And to say that they are patterns and the other things
share in them is
to use empty words and poetical metaphors. For what is it that works, looking to the Ideas? And anything can either be, or become, like another
without
being copied from it, so that whether Socrates or not a man Socrates like might come to be; and evidently this might be so even if Socrates were eternal.
Aristotle
.
The Metaphysics
.
Slide7Logical Shortcomings
Ideas of Non-natural ObjectsAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
Further, of the ways in which we prove
that
the Forms exist, none is convincing; for from some no inference necessarily follows, and
from some arise Forms even of things of which we think there are no Forms.
For according to
the arguments from the existence of the sciences
there
will be Forms of
all
things of which there are
sciences…
Slide8Logical Shortcomings
Ideas of NegationsAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
…
and according to
the
“one over many” argument
there
will be Forms even of
negations…
Slide9Logical Shortcomings
Ideas of Perishable ThingsAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
…
and according to
the
argument that there is
an
object for thought
even
when the thing has perished,
there
will be Forms of
perishable things;
for
we have an image of these
.
Slide10Logical Shortcomings
Ideas of RelationsAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
Further, of the more accurate arguments, some lead to Ideas of
relations,
of
which we say
there
is no independent class,
and
others introduce the
“third man
”.
Slide11Logical Shortcomings
The “Third Man” ArgumentAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
… but
the same terms indicate substance in this and in the ideal world
(
or what will be the meaning of saying
that
there is something apart from
the
particulars – the one over many?).
And
if the Ideas and the particulars
that
share in them have the same form,
there will be something common to
these…
But
if they have not the same form, they must have only the name in common…
Slide12is
is
isis
Socrates
a man
Plato
a man
a man
The
[Second]
Man
The
[Third]
Man
a man
Plato
Aristotle
Logical Shortcomings
The “Third Man” Argument
Slide13Logical Shortcomings
Ideas of IdeasAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
…
the Forms are patterns
not
only of sensible things,
but
of Forms themselves also;
i.e
.
the genus,
as
genus
of
various species,
will be so;
therefore
the same thing
will be pattern and copy.
Slide14Philosophical Shortcomings
The Duplication of Reality
Aristotle.The Metaphysics.
…
as for those who posit the Ideas as causes, firstly, in seeking to grasp the causes of the things around us, they introduced others equal in number to these,
as if a man who wanted to count things thought he would not be able to do it while they were few, but tried to count them when he had added to their number.
For
the Forms are practically equal to – or not fewer than – the things,
in trying to explain which these thinkers proceeded from them to the Forms. For to each thing there answers an entity which has the same
name
and exists apart from the
substances...
Slide15Philosophical Shortcomings
The Multiplication of Reality
Aristotle.The Metaphysics.
…
there will be
several
patterns of the same thing,
and
therefore several Forms;
e.g
. “animal” and “two-footed”
and
also “man himself”
will
be Forms of man.
Slide16Philosophical Shortcomings
The Separation of Substances from ThingsAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
…
it would seem impossible that
the
substance and
that of
which it is the substance
should
exist apart;
how
, therefore, could the Ideas,
being
the substances of things,
exist
apart
?
Slide17Philosophical Shortcomings
The Irrelevancy of Ideas to the World of ChangeAristotle
.The Metaphysics.
Above all one might discuss
the
question
what on earth the Forms
contribute
to sensible things,
either
to those that are eternal or
to
those that come into being
and
cease to be.
For
they cause neither movement
nor any change in them.
Slide18Hylomorphism
(Gr. υλη, matter,
μορφή, form)
is a metaphysical doctrine according to which everything that exists
consists of two intrinsic principles,
one
potential,
namely,
matter,
and one
actual,
namely,
form.
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Slide19Plato
Aristotle
In Plato’s ontologyindividuals and
universals,
i.e. sensuous things
and intelligible
ideas,
exemplify
different
types of being
(
essentially different entities
),
the relations of which
to each other
remain
somewhat unclear
.
In Aristotle’s ontology individuals and
universals exemplify different
aspects of being,distinguished and abstracted by our thought
, but not actually existing
as separate different entities
;
Aristotle’s
forms
may be said
to more or less correspond to
Plato’s
ideas
likewise
representing
what is
universal
about things,
but opposed not, as by Plato,
to
actual
individual
things
,
but to
matter
as mere
potentiality
of
things.
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Slide20Bronze
is
matter,
cylinder
is the
form,
the
bronze cylinder
is a
substance.
Silver
is
matter,
cylinder is the
form, the
silver cylinder is a substance.
Bronze is
matter,
cube is the form,
the
bronze cube
is a
substance
.
Silver
is
matter
,
cube
is the
form,
the
silver cube
is a
substance
.
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Slide21The cylindrical form
is the common (shared) feature of both the bronze and the silver cylinders, just like the cubic form is the common (shared) feature of both the bronze and the silver cubes. However, it is “bronzeness” that seems to be the
common (shared) feature of the bronze cylinder and the bronze cube, just like “silverness” seems to be the common (shared) feature of the silver cylinder and the silver cube. Does this not mean that it is not only form
that represents what is universal about things, but matter
as well?
No, it does not, for both “bronzeness” and “silverness” are to be seen as different
forms
of metallic
matter.
“Metallicity” is, in its turn, one of the
forms
of earth; “earthness”, together with “waterness”, “airness”, and “fireness”, being the four basic
forms
of
primary matter.
This
primary matter is not something real,
for lacking form it lacks reality as well, and is mere abstraction or, to put it otherwise, abstract
possibility, i.e. possibility of anything.
When primary matter becomes earth, water, air, or fire by acquiring one of the respective forms, it becomes real, i.e. capable of becoming or producing something else, not just anything.
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Slide22Clay
is matter,parallelepiped
is the form,
a brick is a
substance.
Brick
is
matter,
house
(
“houseness”
)
is
the
form,
a
(particular
) house is a
substance.
A brick is made of clay
shapedin the form of a parallelepiped
;a house
is made of bricks
arranged in the form of a
“house”
.
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Slide23House
is matter,
town (
“townness”) is
the
form
,
a
(
particular
)
town
is a
substance.
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Brick
is matter,
house (“houseness”
) is the form,
a (
particular
)
house
is
a
substance
.
Slide24Thing
Thing
Thing
Thing
Genus
Thing
Thing
Thing
Thing
Species
Species
Species
Species
Genus
Earth
Water
Air
Fire
Primary matter
(
pure
potentiality
)
Matter
(
the potentiality
)
God
(
the form of all forms
)
Forms
SU
B
S
T
A
N
C
ES
The Doctrine of Matter and Form
Hylomorphism
Slide25Matter
and form are distinguished and counterpoised by Aristotlenot just with respect to generality,
i.e. as particular versus universal;
but
also with respect to modality,
i.e. as
possible
versus
necessary;
thus establishing lasting semantic associations
:
material
a.k.a.
particular
a.k.a. possible
, formal a.k.a.
universal a.k.a.
necessary.Actuality (
a.k.a. the being) turns out to be and is understood as the
unity of abstract opposites: matter
and form,
on the one hand;
potentiality
and
necessity,
on the other hand.
The Doctrine of Potentiality
and Actuality
Slide26The Doctrine of Potentiality
and Actuality… we
must not seek a definition of everything but be content to grasp
the analogy, that it is
as that which is building is to that
which
is capable of building,
and the waking
to
the sleeping
,
and
that which
is seeing to
that which has its eyes shut
but has sight
,
and that which has been shaped out of the matter to the matter,
and that which has been wrought up
to the unwrought. Let actuality be defined by one member of this antithesis, and the
potential by the other.
Aristotle
.The Metaphysics.
Slide27Potentiality
(Gr. δύναμις,
Lat. potentia) is
(1) a power
to produce a change,
(
2
)
the capacity
to change itself,
to acquire
a different,
more completed form
.
Actuality
(
Gr.
ενέργεια,
Lat. actus) is (1) movement (Gr
. κίνησις) or
process as unconsummated activity, (2)
entelechy (Gr.
εντελέχεια
) as
the final realisation of the potential.
Actuality
is prior to
potentiality
(
1
)
in
logos
(in definition
),
(
2
)
in time
(
although in a specific way
),
3)
in substance
.
The Doctrine of Potentiality
and Actuality
Slide28in
logos
(in definition),
in substance
in time
,
because we cannot
identify potentiality
without reference
to the corresponding
actuality
;
(1) as the final cause
,
(2) because anything
with the mere
potentiality to be
is perishable, and
the eternal is prior
to the perishable
.
because
the actual which is identical in species though not in number
with a potentially existing thing
is prior to it;
Actuality
is prior to
potentiality
The Doctrine of Potentiality
and Actuality
Slide29How does
potentiality become actuality?This is done by giving a specific form to otherwise amorphous
matter.But how is this “union” of matter and
form achieved
?To answer this question Aristotle expands his twofold doctrine of matter
and
form
as the constituent principles of being to a fourfold doctrine of
causation
.
The Doctrine of Causation
Slide30The Doctrine of Causation
The Four Types of CausesEvidently we have to acquire knowledge
of the original causes (for we say we
know each thing only when we think we recognize its first cause), and causes are spoken of in four senses.
In one of these we mean the substance, i.e. the essence
(for the “why” is reducible finally to the definition, and the ultimate “why” is a cause and principle); in
another
the matter
or substratum, in a
third
the source of the change,
and in a
fourth
the cause opposed to this,
the purpose
and the good (for this is the end of all generation and change).
Aristotle
.The Metaphysics.
Slide31The vase’s
material
cause
is clay
The vase’s
formal
cause
is the idea (form)
The vase’s
efficient
cause
is the potter
The vase’s
final
cause
is the purpose
The Doctrine of Causation
The Four Types of Causes
Slide32How does
potentiality become actuality?This is done by giving a specific form to otherwise amorphous
matter.But how is this “union” of matter and
form achieved
?To answer this question Aristotle expands his twofold doctrine of matter
and
form
as the constituent principles of being to a fourfold doctrine of
causation
.
It is knowledge
(
οἶδα
)
of causes (
principles) that distinguishes
science (ἐπιστήμη)
from the lower kinds of knowledge that precede it, viz. sense perception (
αἴσθησις), experience (ἐμπειρία)
and art
(τέχνη).The difference between philosophy
(φιλοσοφ
ία
),
or
wisdom
(
σοφ
ία
),
and other (particular) sciences is that philosophy studies
first causes
(
first principles
),
or
,
to put it otherwise
,
causes
(principles)
as such
.
In other words, philosophy deals not with particular
kinds
of being
,
but with
being as such
.
The Doctrine of Causation
Slide33The subject of ontology
(“first philoso
phy”,
“metaphysics”)
is that which is or
the
being
(
ον
).
Granted, all sciences study
that which is;
what else is there to study
?
However, particular sciences study
the being in some specific aspects
(e.g. physics studies it as susceptible to change),
only ontology studies
the being as such,the being as being.
The Being and Its Kinds
Slide34The being falls
under one science,
because all the various senses of the
word are related to and derived from
the one that is basic and common to all.
Just like
“healthy”
does not mean
exactly the same when applied
to
man, complexion
or
life
,
and yet is related to and derived
from one basic sense of
health,
this being a state characteristic of a healthy organism;
so there are many senses in which a thing may be said to
“be”, but all that “is” is related to one central and definite point,
viz. substance.
The Being and Its Kinds
Slide35Substances
QuantitiesQualitiesRelativesPlacesTimesPositions
StatesDoingsUndergoings
The individual horse, the individual man
Two feet tall, six feet tall
White
,
literate
A double
,
a half
In the Lyceum, in the market-place
Yesterday, last year
Sitting, standing
Clad, armed
Cutting, carrying
Being cut, being carried
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide36The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten CategoriesCategory(Lat.
categoria, from Gr.
κατηγορία, predication,
from Gr.
κατηγορέιν
,
to accuse, affirm, predicate)
is any of several fundamental and distinct classes
to which entities or concepts belong
.
The
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary
(the 10
th
edition)
.
Slide37The individual
horseThe individual
man
Substance
(Gr
.
ουσία
,
Lat
.
substantia
)
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Substance,
in the truest and primary
and most definite sense of the word,
is that which is neither predicable of a subject
nor present in a subject;
for instance, the individual
man or horse.
Slide38Substance
(secondary)Animal
(genus)
But in
a secondary sense those
things are
called substances
within which
,
as
species
,
the
primary substances
are included;
also those
which,
as genera, include the species. For instance, the
individual man is included in the species “man”, and the genus to which
the species belongs is “animal”; these, therefore ...
are termed secondary substances.
Horse
(species)
Man
(species)
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide39Substance
QuantityOne
Two
“Quantum”
means that which
is divisible into
two or
more
constituent
parts of which
each is
by nature a
“one”
and a
“this”. A quantum
is a
plurality
if it is
numerable
,
The Being and Its Kinds The Ten Categories
Slide40Substance
QuantityTwo feet tall
Six feet tall
“Quantum” means that which is divisible into two or more
constituent parts of which each is by nature a “one” and a “this”. A quantum is a plurality
if it is
numerable,
a
magnitude
if it is a
measurable
.
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide41Substance
QuantityQualityLiterate
White
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide42Substance
QuantityQualityRelationLeft
Right
Bigger
Smaller
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Those things are called
relative,
which
, being either said
to be of
something else
or
related
to something
else,
are explained
by reference
to that
other thing
.
Slide43Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlace
In the Lyceum
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide44Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlace
In the market-place
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide45Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlaceTime
In 361 A.D.
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide46Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlaceTime
In
383 A
.D.
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide47Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlaceTimePosition
Sitting
Standing
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide48Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlaceTimePosition
State
CladArmed
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide49Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlaceTimePosition
StateAction
Carrying
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide50Substance
QuantityQualityRelationPlaceTimePosition
StateActionAffection
Being carried
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide51(
Primary
)
substances
are
subjects
of predication
;
qualities
and other kinds
of being
(
i.e.
categories other
than substances
),
a subject’s
predicables are
:
species
and genera
(i.e. the so calledsecondary
substances
)
,
that
are present
in a subject
;
that
are said
of a subject
.
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide52The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten CategoriesThus everything
except primary substances is either predicated
of primary substances,
or is present
in them,
and
if these
last did not exist,
it
would
be impossible
for
anything
else
to exist.
Aristotle
.
The Categories
.
Slide53Predicable
is something that may be predicated, especially, as listed in Boethius’ Latin version of Porphyry’s Isagoge, one of the
five most general kinds of attribution: genus, species,
differentia,
property, accident.
It is based upon a similar classification set forth
by Aristotle in the
Topics
.
The
Encyclopaedia
Britannica
(the 2018 Version)
.
The Being and Its Kinds
The Ten Categories
Slide54Questions
?