Group 1 Alex Lochard Michael Kramer Pieter De Wolf Rachel Cohen Problem Statement During political campaigns candidates and parties are faced with limited resources which include time and money That being said it is important to invest resources in geographical areas that will produce the ID: 573497
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Colorado and Florida Target Counties for..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Colorado and Florida Target Counties for Clinton
Group 1: Alex Lochard, Michael Kramer, Pieter De Wolf, Rachel Cohen Slide2
Problem Statement
During political campaigns, candidates and parties are faced with limited resources which include time and money. That being said it is important to invest resources in geographical areas that will produce the greatest amount of votesSlide3
Research Goal
Use several indicators based on political profile, voter profile, and population density to generalize votes
Clinton
and Trump are likely to obtain, then using ArcGIS evaluate which counties of the Republican party
Clinton
should put campaign effort to assure more votes for the general electionSlide4
Methodology
Determined which two states to analyze: Florida and Colorado, both major swing states in this upcoming election in which few votes may determine outcome of state’s winner which can determine the election
Determined factors that influenced voters choices: these included: age, sex, ethnicity, income, occupation, education, urban or rural setting, party affiliation, and voter turnout
Gathered data on all factors by county and created a joint shapefile of both states that included an attribute table including all data. Used this table to analyze each county Slide5
Methodology
I
n
F
inding
F
ocus
C
ounties
Created layers for each variable
Selected counties that were republican
Of those counties, used select by location to select counties that had attributes that favored Clinton
Selected Republican Counties that had a majority of the population between 18 and 34 and 65 and above
Selected Republican counties where women constituted a majority
Selected Republican counties where a majority of residents were non-white
Selected Republican counties where the median income was less than 50,000 dollars
Selected Republican Counties where education levels favored Clinton
Selected Republican counties where occupation favored ClintonSlide6
Methodology In Finding Focus
Counties
Created shape files from each selection
Repeatedly used select by location to find Republican counties that contained the most variables that favored Clinton
Used buffers and city selection of cities with population greater than 8000 residents to find ideal rally points in focus
countiesSlide7
Political Profile - Voter Turnout
by Party Affiliation
Blue counties represent Democratic Counties Slide8
Voter Profile - Education Indicator
Assume voters with a professional degree, high school diploma and less than high school education will vote for Trump, those with some college, Associate Degree, or Bachelor's Degree will vote for
Clinton
Purple counties represent Republican counties where education of population favors ClintonSlide9
Voter Profile - Gender Indicator
Assume women will vote for
Clinton
,
men will
vote for Trump
Orange counties represent Republican counties where women constitute a majority of the population Slide10
Voter Profile - Income Indicator
Assume those counties with Median Income > $50k will vote for Trump, those
<
$50k will vote for
Clinton
Green counties represent Republican counties where median income is below $50kSlide11
Voter Profile -
Ethnicity
Indicator
Assume that White and Asian populations vote for Trump, and Black, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, and American Indian populations vote for
Clinton
Green counties represent Republican counties where ethnicity of population favors Clinton Slide12
Voter Profile - Age Indicator
Assume ages 18-34, 65+ will vote for
Clinton
, 35-64 will vote for Trump
Gold counties represents
Republican counties where age favors Clinton Slide13
Population Density - Urban/Rural Indicator
Assume those in
r
ural areas will vote for Trump and
u
rban areas will vote for
Clinton
Pink counties represent Republican counties that are more urban and favor ClintonSlide14
Voter Profile - Occupation Indicator
Assume agriculture, finance, wholesale and transportation professions vote for Trump,
c
onstruction,
m
anufacturing,
p
ublic
a
dministration,
retail, e
ducation, arts and information professions vote for
Clinton
Green counties represent Republican counties that have occupation type populations that favor ClintonSlide15
ResultsSlide16Slide17Slide18Slide19
Conclusions
Strongest indicators are party affiliation and voter turnout
Based on overlap of all the indicators evaluated Clinton should focus on these Republican counties where she has a chance to gain more voters:
Florida: Marion County, Manatee County, Highlands County
Colorado: Otero County, Denver County
In these counties, Clinton should consider having a rally in urban areas of these counties to win over voters.