PPT-Reasoning with Rules SWRL as Example
Author : debby-jeon | Published Date : 2019-01-21
Jan Pettersen Nytun UIA 1 JPN UiA 2 What is a rule Consist of premise and a conclusion Meaning In any situation where the premise applies the conclusion must
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Reasoning with Rules SWRL as Example" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Reasoning with Rules SWRL as Example: Transcript
Jan Pettersen Nytun UIA 1 JPN UiA 2 What is a rule Consist of premise and a conclusion Meaning In any situation where the premise applies the conclusion must also hold JPN UiA 3. KarlineSoetaert3example(image3D)example(contour3D)example(colkey)example(jet.col)example(perspbox)example(mesh)example(trans3D)example(plot.plist)example(ImageOcean)example(Oxsat)2.Functionsimage2Dand By Lindsey Busker and Sydney Thomson. Lawrence Kohlberg . Born in Bronxville, New York on October 25, 1927. Attended high school at Phillips Academy and then served in the Merchant Marine at the end of World War II. Deductive reasoning. , also . deductive logic. or . logical deduction. or, informally, . ". top-down. " logic. , is the process of . reasoning. from one or more . statements. (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. It differs from . Argument. Monty Python – Argument Clinic video. Monty Python. Premises + Conclusion = Argument. Argument – a group of statements including one or more premises and a conclusion. Premise – a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. It’s Logical. What is Logic?. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. . – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts. .. There are two main types of reasoning:. The other side of logic. Deduction . vs. Induction. Deduction – General to Specific. Induction – Specific to General. Inductive reasoning. Uses particular facts, common threads and ideas to draw a conclusion suggested by evidence. Humans use their common sense all the time. what is it?. can we instill it in our AI programs?. if not, what are the consequences for AI?. We might think of common sense reasoning as the knowledge accumulated through experience that gives us the ability to. After Four years of CER . in the . Classroom. Laura Rossier. F. A. Day Middle School. 8. th. grade Earth & Space Science. laura_rossier@newton.k12.ma.us. What’s your CER experience?. How many have never heard of CER?. Lecture Outline. Inductive Reasoning. Generalizations. Cause and Effect. Analogy. Deductive Reasoning. Syllogism. Enthymeme. Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning: Review. The process of citing a number of specific examples or . Development Part III. Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Criticisms of Kohlberg’s theory. Recent contributions of social psychology and neuroscience to understanding moral judgment. Baby morality. Mike Cooper. 29/01/16. Starter activity. Which number does not belong?. 15. 23. 20. 25. (Harder?) Starter activity. If 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15. is 0.3 x 0.2 = 0.6. ?. Why reason?. When is reasoning needed?. Dr Nicholas . Gibbins - . nmg. @ecs.soton.ac.uk. 2013-2014. The Role of Rules. The Semantic Web concentrates on declarative forms of knowledge representation. OWL, RDF Schema. Rules are a common form of procedural knowledge representation elsewhere in Knowledge Engineering. Mimi . Opkins. CECS 100. Fall 2011. Problem Solving. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts.. When solving a problem, one must understand the question, gather all pertinent facts, analyze the problem i.e. compare with previous problems (note similarities and differences), perhaps use pictures or formulas to solve the problem.. - Charles Sanders Peirce. On the Radar. Researching the Persuasive Speech Assignment. Due Wednesday on . WebCT. (by 11:59 p.m.). Exam Two. This Friday in Lecture. Study Guide on Course Website. Workshops for the Persuasive Speech.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Reasoning with Rules SWRL as Example"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents