PPT-The Crucible logical fallacy project
Author : debby-jeon | Published Date : 2018-10-06
By Kaleigh Gumm Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to ignorance is when someone uses the lack of someones knowledge or information on a subject as proof that their conclusion
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Crucible logical fallacy project" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
The Crucible logical fallacy project: Transcript
By Kaleigh Gumm Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to ignorance is when someone uses the lack of someones knowledge or information on a subject as proof that their conclusion is accurate Universal Example . Write an OPEN, a CLOSED, and a COUNTERARGUMENT thesis for the following question.. Should states make it harder for individuals to buy guns by requiring a background check and a mental health evaluation for all gun buyers?. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of: . http://. www.unc.edu. /. depts. /. wcweb. /handouts/. fallacies.html. (. Editited. ). What is Fallacy?. Fallacies are defects that weaken arguments.. Introduction and Activities. What is a logical fallacy?. A fallacy is an error of reasoning. These are flawed statements that often sound true. Logical fallacies are often used to strengthen an argument, but if the reader detects them the argument can backfire, and damage the writer’s credibility . By the end of this lesson, students will . learn to use the fourth and fifth Keys of Reasoning in debating, i.e. Point of View and Concept.. L. ead. -in: Round-the-table . R. eporting . and . I. ntroduce . illegitimate, controversial arguments or irrelevant points designed to enflame an audience. often identified because they lack adequate evidence to support a claim. Fallacies. . are. :. Why do they matter?. Fallacies. Understanding Argument. English 101. Courtesy . of: . http://. www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.htm. (Edited and Revised by A. Morales, Glendale Community College, . 2014). What is Fallacy?. Unit 1 Section A. FOREIGN LANGUAGE . TEACHING AND RESEARCH PRESS . AIR . FORCE ENGINEERING UNIVERTISY. Doing the right thing is not the problem. Knowing what the right thing is, that’s the. challenge.. Topics. Laws of Logic. Formal Logic. Formal Fallacies. Informal Fallacies. Terms. Logicalbelief.org. Laws of Logic. The law of identity (A is A). Everything is itself and not something else. The law of non-contradiction (A is not non-A). Ad Hominem attacks a person’s character rather than their reasoning. In other words:. Person A makes claim X. Person B attacks person A. Therefore A’s claim is false.. Definition. “How can you argue your case for vegetarianism when you are enjoying your steak?”. . Dylan . G. earlds. Dogmatism – the tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others. Universal. . Example. Tony: “I have the greatest mind ever to exist! I made a 98% on my test!”. Definition. relating to or being the fallacy of arguing from temporal sequence to a causal relation. Modern Example. . I ate a loaf of bread, and got a cold a few days later. Therefore, I must have gotten sick from the bread I ate. nd. Period. Group: Alex, Michael, & Tyler. What is Slippery Slope?. Argument suggest dire consequences from relative minor causes.. "Rhetorical Fallacies." . Cracking the AP English Language and Composition Exam. Camdyn Johnson and Karen . crist. A . Red Herring. is a . fallacy. in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an . Statements formed from sound thinking and proof of reasoning. Inductive Arguments. Specific Facts that lead to a generalization. Deductive Arguments. Begin with a general rule and reach a specific conclusion.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"The Crucible logical fallacy project"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents