/
Common Statistical Errors Common Statistical Errors

Common Statistical Errors - PowerPoint Presentation

ellena-manuel
ellena-manuel . @ellena-manuel
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-01-31

Common Statistical Errors - PPT Presentation

Common Statistical Errors and how to avoid them Conflict of Interest Disclosure I have no potential conflict of interest to report A quick tour of common statistical errors Advice to help your submission pass statistical review ID: 774314

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Common Statistical Errors" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Common Statistical Errors (and how to avoid them)

Conflict of Interest Disclosure I have no potential conflict of interest to report

A quick tour of common statistical errors Advice to help your submission pass statistical review

Pop quiz: p values

Can you spot the error?

Bill Gates walks into a room…

Error 1 DATAP VALUESSTATISTICIAN

Biostatisticians ConsultationThe statistician works on a single paper or protocol as a once-offCollaborationThe statistician works with you on all of your projects over many yearsPartnershipThe statistician is a key part of the research team and develops scientific ideas

Statisticians can also help with… Thinking through the scientific questionExperimental designData collectionData quality assurance

Inference: is something there?

Estimation: How big is it? MeanMedianProportion

Trial Results 10% reduction in breast cancer incidenceP=0.07

Error 2 Messi beats me 5 – 1P = 0.08 by binomial test

Error 2 I could play for Barcelona!

Inference 101 State a null hypothesis

Inference 101 State a null hypothesisGet your data, calculate p value

Inference 101 State a null hypothesisGet your data, calculate p valueIf p<5%, reject null hypothesisIf p ≥5%, don’t reject null hypothesis

Inference 101 Don’t accept the null hypothesisIn a court case: guilty or not guiltyIn a statistical test: reject or don’t reject

Error 2 Barcelona still hasn’t called.

Which is bigger?

Error 3 “At randomization, there was a statistically significant difference in age between the drug and placebo group (p=0.04).”“Erectile function decreased in older men during the two-year follow-up period (p<0.0001).”

Don ’t run a statistical test if you already know the answerError 3

Error 4 Erk3, ECAD, P21, P53, Cadherin, il 6, il12 and Jak had no association with outcome (p>0.2 for all), Ki67 was a predictor of recurrence (p=0.03). We recommend that Ki67 be measured to determined eligibility for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Error 4 Multiple testing: Looked at 9 different biomarkers. 35% chance of at least one marker with p<0.05.1 significant p-value is not grounds to change practice.

Error 4 Every single p value tests a hypothesisThink carefully about every scientific question you want to ask

Error 5 RESULTS: Compared with a BMI of 18.5 to 21.9 kg/m2 at age 18 years, the hazard ratio for premature death was 2.79 (CI, 2.04 to 3.81) for a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater. CONCLUSION: Moderately higher adiposity at age 18 years is associated with increased premature death in younger and middle-aged U.S. women

A RESULT IS NOT A CONCLUSION! Error 5

Biostatistics BiologyMathBiology

Error 5 OLD CONCLUSION: Moderately higher adiposity at age 18 years is associated with increased premature death in younger and middle-aged U.S. womenNEW CONCLUSION:

Error 5 OLD CONCLUSION: Moderately higher adiposity at age 18 years is associated with increased premature death in younger and middle-aged U.S. womenNEW CONCLUSION:Public health interventions should relay the risks of premature death among overweight women to encourage teen girls to avoid obesity.

Error 6 Mean gestational time was 36.345 weeks in the experimental group compared to 36.229 weeks in controls (p=0.6945).

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Statistical Code

Simple Statistical Errors Melissa AsselResearch BiostatisticianMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center