PDF-STATE OF WEST VIRGINIASUPREME COURT OF APPEALSCARLA HAGAClaimant Below

1 FILED November 6 2020EDYTHE NASH GAISER CLERKSUPREME COURT OF APPEALSOF WEST VIRGINIA x0000x00002 xMCIxD 0 xMCIxD 0 compensable for sprain of ligaments of the lumbar spine. No 131230 Kanawha County 13C483 RORY L PERRY II CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Teresa Tarr in her capacity as counsel for the West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission and the West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission De FILED May 7, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK TERESA STERNS, Admin. Name . plates. Handouts. Slides. Choice of . Law. Office hours rescheduled this week. Monday 4PM. . Roth Lecture. . Judge Cornelia . Pillard. , “Reinventing public Interest Law”. Tuesday . Admin. Name . plates. Handouts. Slides. Choice of Law. Mock . mediation . this Wednesday. Go directly to room on chart (not to regular classroom). Review of Settlement. Fees. Fee shifting problem. Settlement and fees in A Civil Action. Facts of the Case. : . The . case began on March 2, 1801, when an obscure Federalist, William Marbury, was designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia. Marbury and several others were appointed to government posts created by Congress in the last days of John Adams's presidency, but these last-minute appointments were never fully finalized. The disgruntled appointees invoked an act of Congress and sued for their jobs in the Supreme Court. The 2015 Update on Statutes & Court Decisions Impacting Professional Counselors Pre-Conference Workshop Sponsored by: The Tennessee Counseling Association Jeri Lee, Ed. D., J.D., HSP, LPSC, Baltimore City Case No. 117195002 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2032 September Term, 2018 ______________________________________ MIGUEL DUKE v. STATE OF MARYLAND _______ ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEALSCALES2The State seeks to appealthe trial court146s January 30 2019 order that pursuant to this Court146s mandatevacates Efren Yero146s sentence and directs that Yero be res Counsel for RespondentiiiTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF AUTHORITIESPRELIMINARY STATEMENTSTATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS SUMMARY ARGUMENT ARGUMENTTHERE IS NO BASIS FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW O Dated February 25 2013 MOORE Judge Defendant-Appellant George Mose appeals from his sentence and conviction as set forth in the January 7 2011 judgment entry of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA BILL McCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBIN A COMPTON Assistant Attorney General STEVE MARTINKO et alPlaintiffsOPINION AND ORDERPLAINTIFFS146 APRIL 23 2020 MOTION FOR APRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONvCase No 20-00062-GRETCHEN WHITMER in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Mi PETITIONERS BRIEF ON JURISDICTIONON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDACAREY HAUGHWOUTPublic DefenderFifteenth Judicial Circuit of FloridaAnthony Calv Tax Executives Institute, Inc. . Houston Texas . Jordan M. Goodman. Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered. jgoodman@hmblaw.com. Marilyn Wethekam . Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered. mwetheka@hmblaw.com.