/
Turbulence Acceleration Model for the Broad Band Blazar Spectra Turbulence Acceleration Model for the Broad Band Blazar Spectra

Turbulence Acceleration Model for the Broad Band Blazar Spectra - PowerPoint Presentation

essencemessage
essencemessage . @essencemessage
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-04

Turbulence Acceleration Model for the Broad Band Blazar Spectra - PPT Presentation

Katsuaki Asano ICRR U Tokyo Collaborators Yuto Teraki YITP Kyoto Masaaki Hayashida ICRR Fumio Takahara Osaka etc Nonthermal Emission Supernova Remnant SN1006 ID: 797439

acceleration amp hard energy amp acceleration energy hard model spectrum injection electron diffusion parameters hayashida emission steady blazar asano

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Turbulence Acceleration Model for the Br..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Turbulence Acceleration Model for the Broad Band Blazar Spectra

Katsuaki

Asano

ICRR, U. Tokyo

Collaborators:

Yuto

Teraki

(YITP, Kyoto), Masaaki

Hayashida

(ICRR),

Fumio

Takahara

(Osaka) etc.

Slide2

Non-thermal Emission

Supernova Remnant SN1006

Consistent with the diffusive shock acceleration (Fermi I)+Bohm Limit!

All non-thermal phenomena are due to shocks?

Acero

+ 2010

Electron energy distribution:

Single power-law with the index of 2.1,

cut off at 10 TeV and B=30μG.

 

Bohm Limit (

) &

 

Slide3

Open Problems in Blazar Emission

Kino,

Takahara

,

Kusunose

2002

1.

Index harder than

2 for the electron injection spectrum.2. Lower maximum energyMrk 421:B=38mGIf even for .But actual Max. Energy

 

3. Too sharp break in the electronspectrum.Compared to the cooling break,the difference in the indicesseems large.Inoue & Takahara 2002

The Bohm factor should be

 

Slide4

Electron Index in Fermi BL Lacs

Yan+

Slide5

Many Parameters in Broken-power-law fit

Need

double break

and

low-energy cut-off

Radio should be different component in this case

Slide6

Particle Acceleration in Blazar Jets

Shock Acceleration may be hard in highly magnetized plasma.

Kirk &

Heavens 1989, Lemoine

& Pelletier 2010, Sironi+ 2013 etc.In blazar

Sironi+ 2015

The parameter range is very limited.Acceleration via turbulence

Park & Petrosian 1995

Becker & Dermer 2006Stawarz & Petrosian 2008

Bottcher+ 1999Schlickeiser & Dermer 2000Lefa+ 2011Kakuwa+ 2015In BlazarsIn GRBsBykov & Meszaros 1996Dermer & Humi 2001Asano & Terasawa 2009, 2015Murase+ 2012

Slide7

Phenomenological Treatment

 

 

Kolmogorov+Alfvenic

q=5/3, Compressible q=2 (hard sphere)

Diffusion

Acceleration

Cooling

Injection

No cooling, continuous injection, time evolution

 

harder than the shock case

 

Stochastic Acceleration due to turbulence

(2

nd

order Fermi acc.) leads to a hard spectrum.

Slide8

Interaction with Alfven Wave

Energy gain per scattering

Alfvenic

Wave (transverse/incompressible)

 

pitch angle diffusion

mean free path

 

 

 

resonance condition

However, the ratio

is typically 0.1 in blazars.

It seems that the Alfven waves cannot be the

enrgy

source.

 

 

 

 

Slide9

Steady outflow

Continuous shell ejection with a width of R

0

/Γ in commoving frame

Elecrton injection from R=R

0

to 2R

0

with stochastic accelerationTurbulence Index: Kolmogorov q=5/3Both injection and acceleration stop at R=2R0Our ModelElectron injectionStochastic accelerationSynchrotron emission and coolingInverse Compton emission and coolingAdiabatic cooling (V∝R2)Photon escapeNo electron escape!

Physical Processes

Slide10

Simple case

Constant injection & constant diffusion coefficient

Electron spectrum

Energy density ratio

Slide11

1ES 1101-232

The simple model can reproduce the spectrum of 1ES 1101-232

Slide12

But, in Mrk 421…

Slide13

But, in Mrk 421…

To produce a soft spectrum, increasing injection rate

with radius is assumed.

Hard to reconcile GeV

data.

Magnetic Energy is subdominant.

Alfven Wave is actually responsible?

Slide14

Alternative: Compressible Waves

Fast

 

 

 

 

Slow

 

 

 

 

 

x5 speed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Slide15

Acceleration by compressible wave

Transit Time Damping (Scatter by mirror force)

Formulae of Energy Diffusion Coefficient:

 

Ptuskin

1988

Cho &

Lazarian

2006

 

Lynn+ 2014

 

Non-resonant (need spatial diffusion

coeff

.)

Resonant (

)

 

The largest scale eddy dominates

The amplitude

is dominated by the

smallest scale for q<2.

is written with the smallest eddy?

 

Slide16

Projection

Test particle

simulation in pure linear

Fast Waves

Fast

 

 

 

 

, 10 mode

Kolmogorov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High-beta plasma

Teraki

& Asano in prep.

Slide17

Results of the Test Particle Simulation

 

 

 

 

Inject

 

 

 

 

 

 

(weak

turb

.)

 

While only a small fraction of particles of

can be accelerated for

,

almost all of relativistic particles are accelerated in

 

Preliminary

Mirror force:

Interaction Time scale:

Electric Field:

Energy Gain Rate:

 

Hard Sphere

Slide18

Hard-Sphere Model

Parameters are

 

Required for any model

Only

one

peculiar parameters

 

 

Cho &

Vishniac

2000

Supposing the compressional waves

are responsible, we model as following.

Parameters are constant during the dynamical

time scale

, and injection and acceleration

suddenly shutdown after that.

 

Slide19

Mrk421

 

Low maximum energy and curved electron spectrum are naturally reproduced

with temporal evolution effects.

See also

Kakuwa

+ 2015

Slide20

Diffusion coefficient in Mrk 421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If we assume

Adopting our formula for the index of 5/3

Then,

While the required value:

 

Reasonable

Slide21

Very Hard Spectrum in 3C 279

Broken

power-law

Parameters

Slide22

3C 279 Steady Model

Hayashida+2012

Model for the Steady State

SSC Component constrains

the emission radius

 

 

Asano &

Hayashida

2015

Slide23

Flare Model

The same radius, Lorentz factor, and UV field as those in the steady model.

 

Slide24

Light curve

Slide25

Energy Density

Drenkhahn

2002

Assumed Values

 

Very Weak Magnetic Field.

Negative for

the magnetic reconnection,and the jet acceleration by magnetic dissipation.

 

Slide26

Extreme Hard Blazar 1ES 1101-232

Electron spectrum

Photon

spectrum

q=5/3

Asano+ 2014

Expanding jet

No

steady state

Temporal evolution is essential

Slide27

FSRQ 3C 279

Hayashida+2012

Steady State

SSC Component constrains

the emission radius

 

 

Asano &

Hayashida

2015

Flare State

 

Slide28

RX J1136.5+6737

Preliminary

 

MAGIC team

 

Slide29

1ES 1959+650

Preliminary

 

 

Slide30

PKS 1510−089

Preliminary

Slide31

Summary

In relativistic jets, acceleration by fast wave turbulence may be expected.

Energy diffusion timescale becomes time-independent=Hard Sphere.

Simple model agrees with Blazar spectra, which supports the Hard Sphere acceleration.

Mizuno+ 2007

Slide32

予備スライド

Slide33

Test Particle Simulation

Particle injection in

MHD simulations,

where the s

low-mode is dominant.

 

Lynn+ 2014

Slide34

3C 279 Flare

Lightcurve

Evolution of energy density

Slide35

Big Flare in FSRQ 3C 279

Hayashida

+ 2015

Slide36

Spectrum

Extremely hard.

Stochastic Acc.

seems preferable.

Broken

power-lawModel parameters

Slide37

Magnetic

Pressure Dominant Case

 

Fast Mode

 

 

Transversal to longitudinal

 

 

Nearly Perpendicular to B

Slow Mode

 

 

 

Longitudinal to Transversal

 

Nearly Parallel to B

Slide38

RM不安定性による磁場の増幅・乱流スペクトル

Kolmogorov