PPT-Patent Damages: A 2015 Primer

Judge Bryson Chief Judge Clark Judge Gilstrap Judge Love Steve Williams Bo Davis amp Alan Ratliff Moderators OUTLINE 2015 Federal Circuit Patent Damages Roundup 8 in 08 Reasonable Royalty Trends in Apportionment. March 17, 2015. Donald M. Cameron. Relief Typically Sought. Declaration as to . Validity. Infringement. Injunction. Damages, or. Accounting of profits. Delivery up or destruction. Costs. Interest . The Exclusive Right – Section 42. for Demand Letters. HEA. . 1102- Bad . Faith Assertions of . Patent . Infringement. Indiana- Patent Troll Statute- Demand Letters . HEA. 1102- “Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement”. Effective: July 1, 2015 . Nisha Mody. nmody@oskr.com. Who Proffers Damages. Usually Plaintiffs hire one expert and Defendants hire another. Both are independent. Experts usually are . Economists . Financial Experts (CFA designation) . Presented by David Neal. © 2016 Workman Nydegger. Outline. Halo v. Pulse . Is the Seagate Test Consistent with 35 U.S. Code . § . 284?. Overview:. History . of Enhanced Damages. Underwater Devices v. Morrison-Knudsen and Opinions of Counsel. April 2016 . Jason Rantanen. Associate Professor. University of Iowa College of Law. jason-rantanen@uiowa.edu. Based on USPTO statistics as of . February 29, 2016 . (http://. www.uspto.gov. /patents-application-process/appealing-patent-decisions/statistics/. Joel Lutzker. General Counsel. March . 27, . 2013. . Topics. Why Mark?. Who Must Mark?. What to Mark?. When to Mark?. How to Mark?. Virtual Marking Primer. Questions. 2. Why Mark?. 35 U.S.C. §287(a):. Erik . Puknys. , . Partner. ,.  . Finnegan. Karen Robinson. , Director of Litigation. , Adobe. Kim Schenk. , . Principal. , Charles River Associates. Patrick Weston, . Senior Litigation Counsel, . & Recent Case . in Korea. Hee-Young JEONG. Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA. April 22, 2015. The IPR Litigation System. Intellectual Property Tribunal. (IPT; Administrative Agency). Supreme Court. April 16, 2015. Anderson. Barren. Bath. Boyle. Boyd. Breathitt. Butler. Caldwell. Carlisle. Clark. Clay. Crittenden. Cumberland. Edmonson. Elliott. Estill. Fayette. Floyd. Franklin. Gallatin. Green. Harrison. for . AIPLA Corporate Practice Committee. Susan Kirsch, Partner. October 2015 . A Comparison of the UK, German, and French Patent Courts. United Kingdom. The European Courts - UK court structure. Court of Appeal. Halo v. Pulse. June 15, 2017. MNACCA In-House Counsel Conference. Jason Zucchi. Principal. Fish & Richardson P.C.. Topics for Discussion. INSIGHTS. Litigation Webinar Series. 2. The new . Halo . April 18, 2018. Justin A. Hendrix. , . Partner. , . Finnegan. Doug . Lumish. , . Partner. , Latham & Watkins LLP. Kim . Schenk. , . Principal. , Charles River Associates. Darin Snyder. , . Partner. December 14, 2017. Karen Boyd, Turner Boyd. Daralyn Durie, Durie Tangri. Leah Waterland, Cisco Systems, Inc.. Moderator: Gregory Pinsonneault, . LitiNomics. . Apportionment. 2. Why apportion?. What is the correct royalty base?. Design Patent Damages After The Supreme Court + The Truth About Design Patents and Anticipation 19 th Annual Berkeley-Stanford Advanced Patent Law Institute December 6 & 7, 2018 Alan N. Herda, Partner