PPT-Confounding

Author : giovanna-bartolotta | Published Date : 2017-04-02

Two types of confounding 1 A cofounding variable hides a nonapparent relationship between two variables 2 A cofounding variable at least partly explains

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Confounding" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Confounding: Transcript


Two types of confounding 1 A cofounding variable hides a nonapparent relationship between two variables 2 A cofounding variable at least partly explains away an apparent. within block Must do some sort of incomplete block analysis If you do not certain eects confounded Confounding two eects are indistinguishable May sacrice certain eects thought to be small design makes setup simple 241 Confounding in with only 2 blo 110 brPage 2br Outline 61 Blocking a Replicate Factorial Design 62 Confounding in the Factorial Design 63 Confounding the Factorial Design in Two Blocks 64 Confounding the Factorial Design in Four Blocks 65 General Approach for Arranging Design in a Confounding Variables. If I wanted to prove that smoking causes heart issues, what are some confounding variables?. The object of an experiment is to prove that A causes B.. A confounding variable is anything that could cause change in B, that is not A.. Prepared for:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). www.ahrq.gov. This presentation will:. Describe the key variables of interest with regard to factors that determine appropriate statistical analysis. Prepared for:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). www.ahrq.gov. T. his presentation will. :. Provide a rationale for study design choice and describe key design features. Define start of . Prepared for:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). www.ahrq.gov. This presentation will:. Show how to choose concurrent, active comparators from the same source population (or justify the use of no-treatment comparisons/ historical comparators/different data sources). Prepared for:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). www.ahrq.gov. This presentation will:. Describe the data source(s) that will be used to identify important covariates. Discuss the potential for unmeasured confounding and misclassification. Introduction. Fact or Falsehood. Human intuition is remarkable accurate and free from error.. Most people seem to lack confidence in the accuracy of their beliefs.. Case studies are particularly useful because of the similarities we all share.. Prepared for:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). www.ahrq.gov. This presentation will:. Propose and describe planned sensitivity analyses. Describe important subpopulations in which measures of effect will be assessed for homogeneity . Aaron Gember-Jacobson, . Wenfei. Wu. , . Xiujun. Li, . Aditya. . Akella. , . Ratul. . Mahajan. 1. Important network planes. Data plane. Forwards packets. Control plane. Computes routes. Analyze using traceroute, . Data Collection: . Experiments and Observational Studies. 1/23/12. Association. versus Causation. Confounding Variables. Observational Studies . vs. Experiments. Randomized Experiments. Section 1.3. Question #1:. 1. A researcher compared the effectiveness of massed versus distributed practice in preparing for a memory test. Each of two groups memorized the definitions of 50 vocabulary words.. In group A, there were 25 participants who were all under twenty-five years of age. Participants in group A used the method of distributed practice, studying for 30 minutes on each of four evenings. They were tested on the fifth morning at 7:00 A.M. In group B, there were 25 participants who were all over sixty-five years of age.. 4. Considerations for Interpretation. Confounding. 1. . Introduction. Understanding what the data can tell us and cannot tell us. 2. 3. Approach to understanding the data. If we see an association, what other possible explanations can there be besides causation?. . Bsc. . Veterinary Medicine . Bsc. . Public health. Master of HSM at KU. Chapter 03. Types of . Studies. Key messages. Choosing . the appropriate study design is a crucial step in an . epidemiological investigation.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Confounding"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents