/
Considerations for Evaluating Models of Language Understand Considerations for Evaluating Models of Language Understand

Considerations for Evaluating Models of Language Understand - PowerPoint Presentation

giovanna-bartolotta
giovanna-bartolotta . @giovanna-bartolotta
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2016-09-11

Considerations for Evaluating Models of Language Understand - PPT Presentation

Gabriel Recchia University of Cambridge Background The bAbI dataset Introducing the GABITS dataset http nowin2dcomgabits Some history Some history slide from Bordes ID: 464556

hall room carol kitchen room hall kitchen carol eve lamp billiard dining dataset babi task people frank holding questions

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Considerations for Evaluating Models of ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Considerations for Evaluating Models of Language Understanding and Reasoning

Gabriel

Recchia

University of

CambridgeSlide2

Background: The

bAbI

dataset

Introducing the GABITS dataset

(

http

://nowin2d.com/gabits

/

)Slide3

Some historySlide4

Some history

(slide from

Bordes

, Weston, Chopra,

Mikolov

,

Joulin

&

Bottou

, 2015)Slide5

Generating

Process

Training Set

Test SetSlide6

Facebook’s bAbI

dataset

(slide from

Bordes

, Weston, Chopra,

Mikolov, Joulin

&

Bottou

, 2015)Slide7

The bAbI

dataset

(slide from

Bordes

, Weston, Chopra,

Mikolov, Joulin

&

Bottou

, 2015)Slide8

Introducing GABITS

The Grounded and

bAbI

-Inspired Task SetSlide9

Each training instance consists ofA narrative

A group of questions and associated answers

An image illustrating the state of the world at every point when something changes state

A symbolic representation of the state of the world at every point when something changes state (optional)

Introducing GABITS

The Grounded and

bAbI

-Inspired Task SetSlide10

1 The lamp is in the kitchen.

2 The ball is in the dining room.

3 Eve is in the hall.

4 Carol is in the kitchen.

5 Frank is in the hall.

6 Carol got the lamp.7 Eve went to the kitchen.8 Eve travelled to the billiard room.9 Frank travelled to the kitchen.10 Eve went to the kitchen.

11 Carol travelled to the billiard room.

12 Carol discarded the lamp.

13 Carol grabbed the lamp.

NarrativeSlide11

14 (T1.a) Who is in the kitchen?

Eve,Frank

15 (T2.a) Where is Eve?

kitchen

16 (T3.a) What is Carol holding?

lamp17 (T12.3) How many objects is Carol holding? one

18 (T3.b) Who is holding the lamp?

Carol

19 (T3.b) Who is holding the ball?

no one

20 (T4.a) What has Carol held?

lamp

21 (T4.b) Who has held the lamp? Carol22 (T6) Who moved the lamp to the billiard room? Carol23 (T7.a) Where has Eve been?

billiard room,hall,kitchen24 (T7.a) Where has Frank been? hall,kitchen25 (T7.c) Where has the lamp been? billiard

room,kitchen26 (T7.b) Where has Eve not been? dining room29 (T8.a) Who has been in the hall? Eve,Frank

30 (T8.c) What has been in the kitchen? lamp32 (T8.c) What has been in the billiard room? lamp33 (T8.b) Who has not been in the billiard room? FrankQuestionsSlide12

27 (T12.8) How many people have been in the kitchen?

t

hree

28 (T13.8) Have fewer than four people been in the kitchen?

yes

31 (T13.8) Have fewer than three objects been in the kitchen? yes37 (T11) Who has been in the hall or the dining room (but not both)?

Eve,Frank

38 (T9.a) Who has been in the dining room or the kitchen (or both)?

Carol,Eve,Frank

42 (T13.9) Have more than five people been in the billiard room or the hall or both?

no

Questions (cont.)Slide13

Visual representation of worldSlide14

1 The lamp is in the kitchen.

2 The ball is in the dining room.

3 Eve is in the hall.

4 Carol is in the kitchen.

5 Frank is in the hall.Slide15

6 Carol got the lamp.Slide16

7 Eve moved to the kitchen.Slide17

Symbolic representation of world

agent2.name Frank

agent2.x 170

agent2.y 414

(agent2.room hall)

item0.name lamp

item0.x 278

item0.y 408

(item0.room kitchen)

(item0.owner Carol)

item1.name ball

item1.x 118

item1.y 52(item1.room dining room)(item1.owner null)

time: 65(Carol took the lamp)agent0.name Eveagent0.x 149agent0.y 324(agent0.room hall)agent1.name Carolagent1.x 284agent1.y 414(agent1.room kitchen)Slide18

self-contained

:

all or nearly all

of the information necessary to perform well at the task

is

present within the training dataIt should be obviously possible for a human to solve the task even if they do not speak the language in which the task is rendered

AdvantagesSlide19

incremental and compositional

:

questions build

on

each other

Advantages

Who is in the hall?

Who has been in the hall?

Who has not been in the hall

?

Who has been in the hall and the lounge

?

How many people have been in the hall?

How many people have been in the hall and the lounge?Slide20

wide-coverage

:

the tasks in the dataset correspond to diverse

abilities

For even wider coverage - even more tasks!

In recent years, there has been an increasing number of papers with (mostly

) self-contained tasks involving two- or three-dimensional spatial

representations

Contact me for our list so far!

Or to let me know about more

tasks to add to the collection!

Advantages