/
Interdisciplinary collaboration on O-MIF Interdisciplinary collaboration on O-MIF

Interdisciplinary collaboration on O-MIF - PowerPoint Presentation

giovanna-bartolotta
giovanna-bartolotta . @giovanna-bartolotta
Follow
425 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-23

Interdisciplinary collaboration on O-MIF - PPT Presentation

University of California San Diego Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Gerardo Dominguez Mark Thiemens Why Oxygen Foundations Foundations in Equilibrium Thermodynamics Partition Functions depend on ID: 479715

oxygen solar fractionation isotopic solar oxygen isotopic fractionation formation mif system terrestrial h2o mass effect chemistry states shielding ozone state 1000 amp

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Interdisciplinary collaboration on O-MIF" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Interdisciplinary collaboration on O-MIF

University of California, San DiegoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Gerardo Dominguez

Mark ThiemensSlide2

Why Oxygen?Slide3

Foundations

Foundations in Equilibrium Thermodynamics

Partition Functions depend on

mass or reduced mass

Leads to “Mass-Dependent”

Fractionation Patterns

Quantum Mechanics as a Basis for

Isotopic Fractionation

Mass spectrometry has been method of choice Slide4

Mass Dependent Processes Define Slope ½ Line

TFL

δ

18

O

δ

17

O

Terrestrial Rainwater

O

2

(atmos.)

SMOW

Terrestrial Silicates

20

40

10

20

-20

-40

-10

-20Slide5

Clayton

Discovery of a process where δ

17

O ~ δ

18

O !

R.N. Clayton, L. Grossman, and T.K.

Mayeda

, Science, 1972Slide6

Motivation for O3

experiments (<1983):

Big assumption in the field was that only nuclear processes (

spallation

, radioactive decay, injection of SN material) could lead to deviations from mass-dependent fractionation

Chemically, however, identical particles (

16

O

16

O) are indistinguishable

leads

to differentiation in the number of quantum states for symmetric and asymmetric O

3 moleculesSlide7

Heavy Ozone= MIF ?

Note, no 17

O measured

& 400 per mil effect for δ

18

O?!Slide8

Ozone (O

3) formation in gas-phase is

Mass-Independently Fractionated

A Chemical Process May Produce Anomalous Fractionations

Thiemens and

Heidenreich

,

Science

, 1983Slide9

Proposed Models for MIF Effect of O3

and Early Solar System (1983)

Molecular Symmetry ?Slide10

Proposed Models for MIF Effect of O3

and Early Solar System (1983)

Self Shielding of O

2

?Slide11

Proposed Models for MIF Effect of O

3

and Early Solar System (1983)

Self Shielding of COSlide12

First explanation summary

Isotopic

self

shielding of O

2

to

explain

lab

experiments

Suggestion that effect may be relevant for solar system (CO self-shielding)

O

2

as a producer of MIF in solar nebula kinetically ruled out by Navon

and Wasserburg (1985)Slide13

Thiemens and Heidenreich

(1986)Slide14

The shaded

region for the asymmetric molecule constitutes a greater fraction of the total region

N

+

EJ

is the number of quantum states accessible to the transition state for dissociation from a given E and J state

ρ

EJ

is the density (number per unit energy) of quantum states of the

vibrationally

excited molecule

Non-RRKM theory

Enrichment depends on the

symmetry

of the intermediate complex formed during collision.

Gao

and Marcus,

Science

(2001)Slide15
Slide16

Geochemical ApplicationsSlide17
Slide18

MIF in Ozone Important for Other Atmospheric Species

M

. Thiemens, Ann. Rev,

2006

atmosphereSlide19
Slide20
Slide21
Slide22

Oxygen in Martian CO3

Farquhar et al.,

Science

, 1998Slide23

Detection of oxygen isotopic anomaly in terrestrial atmospheric carbonates and its implications to Mars

R.

Shaheen

, A.

Abramian

, J. Horn, G. Dominguez, R. Sullivan, and Mark Thiemens,

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

, 2010Slide24

Oxygen Isotope

Anomaly in atmospheric CO

3

Oxygen

isotope

anomaly

in

terrestrial

aerosol

carbonate

D

17

O

Δ

17

OSlide25

Fig. .

The

molecular

mechanism

of

the

origin

of

Oxygen

Isotope Anomaly in Atmospheric Carbonates . A). Ozone

isotope exchange on existing carbonate aerosols

with dissociative adsorption of water. B).

In-situ formation of carbonates and interaction with ozone

on particle surfaces.

A= existing carbonates

B= in-situ

carbonate formation

O

M

C

O

O

H

O

H

H

O

H

O

3

O

2

M

C

O

O

O

g

+

g

-

g

+

g

-

(A)

O

O

O

:

:

M(OH)+ OH

MO+ H

2

O

O

3

O

3

O

3

CO

2

CO

3

-2

HCO

3

-

MCO

3

OH

-

OH

-

H

2

O

CO

2

CO

2

-

(B)

Mechanisms

of Oxygen Isotope Exchange Slide26

MIF in CO3 Summary

Anomalous CO

3

discovered in Earth’s Atmosphere on aerosol particles

Controlled laboratory studies show that anomaly transfer from O

3

to CO

3

requires SOME liquid water

Helps to explain disequilibrium chemistry of Martian CO

3

Highlights the importance of heterogeneous chemistry on surfaces and power of MIF signal in understanding these reactionsSlide27

The Solar System RevisitedSlide28

The Distribution of Oxygen Isotopes in the Solar System

TFL

δ

18

O

δ

17

O

Mars

Terrestrial Rainwater

Asteroidal

H

2

O

Chondrules

Terrestrial Rocks

SMOW (Earth)

(-60,-60), Δ

17

O~ -26.5± 5.6 ‰

10

20

-20

-40

-10

-20

20

40

Calcium-Aluminum Inclusions (4.56

Gyrs

.)

The Sun ?

-60

-80

-100

-30

?

Solar Wind

(-99, -79)Slide29

Photo-chemical origin: Self-shielding of CO

h

ν

91 – 111 nm

CO (C

16

O + C

18

O + C

17

O)

12

C

18

O

12

C

17

O

12

C

16

O

[

17,18

O]/[

16

O]

Self-shielded zone

Immediate

consequence of self-shielding:

δ

17

O/

δ

18

O

= 1 fractionation lineSlide30

Self-shielding of CO in solar nebula

High above the mid plane at large R (~ 30 AU) temperature of ~ 50 K

(Lyons and Young, Nature 2005)

1-D time dependent photochemical Model (with 96 species and 375 reactions)

Showed:

Substantial MIF in bulk oxygen isotopes in the nebula was possible on time scales of 10

5

year

Solved:

1-D Continuity equation for each species as a function of height at

midplaneSlide31

Laboratory

Tests

Slope = 1.38

Slope = 0.52

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1000*ln(1+

d

18

O/1000) (‰)

1000*ln(1+

d

17

O/1000) (‰)

107 nm

105 nm

97 nm

94 nm

97.03 nm

94.12 nm

107.61and 105.17 nm

combined

Product CO

2

No need to invoke self-shielding

Fractionation in

CO

photodissociation

is

sufficient

Chakraborty

et al.,

Science

, 2008Slide32

E

1

π

state is resonantly perturbed by another bound state

k

3

π

,

which

predissociates

Accidental predissociation

Klopotek

and Vidal, 1985

Chakraborty et al., Science, 2008

Potential Energy Diagram of COSlide33

CO Photodissociation: Interpretation of the Same Slope

Accidental

pre-dissociation

may be the cause behind the anomalous

17

O enrichment

Simplified PictureSlide34

Sun

Experimental Mixing Line (Photochemical)

CAI Line (Slope ~1)

Slope =1.72

Mixing Line Slide35

Calculations associated with an

isotope effect in photoabsorption from first principles of Quantum chemistry

B.B.

Muskatel

, F.

Remacle

, R.D. Levine (Fritz Haber Institute, The Hebrew University

Jerusalem, Israel

M.Thiemens

UCSD

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011Slide36

The Calculation

Use N2:

isoelectronic

with CO and all potential energy surfaces known in high detail

Include all surfaces:

Rydberg

and valence states

White light pulse for time evolutionary

Schroedinger

equation and therefore isotopes

Both adiabatic and

diabatic

approach; significant at curve crossings and perturbational quantificationCalculate effective coupling energy and isotope effect from

thatSlide37

Energy Level Diagram of N

2

S

PSlide38

Hamiltonian used in this treatment is a matrix:

The effective coupling between the

diabatic

states is defined by:Slide39

The

vibrational states in the adiabatic picture are determined by

diagonalizing

the Hamiltonian in the absence of the light field.

Explicitly, we

diagonalize

the Hamiltonian given by:

Slide40
Slide41
Slide42

This is only for isotopic population from the application of

white light

BUT

in nature it is a solar spectrumSlide43
Slide44

Recent Work on Oxygen in the Solar System

How?

G. Dominguez,

A Heterogeneous Chemical Origin for the

16

O-rich and

16

O-poor

Reservoirs of the Early Solar System

,

The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2010Slide45

The Distribution of Oxygen Isotopes in the Solar System

TFL

δ

18

O

δ

17

O

Mars

Terrestrial Rainwater

Asteroidal

H

2

O

Chondrules

Terrestrial Rocks

SMOW (Earth)

(-60,-60), Δ

17

O~ -26.5± 5.6 ‰

10

20

-20

-40

-10

-20

20

40

Calcium-Aluminum Inclusions (4.56

Gyrs

.)

The Sun ?

-60

-80

-100

-30

?

Solar Wind

(-99, -79)Slide46

Molecular Clouds

Gas and Dust

Molecular Cloud Chemistry: H

2

and ice formation on dust grain surfaces

Gravitational Instabilities & Dust Cooling

Star Formation

Eagle Nebula (Hubble Image)Slide47

Oxygen in Dense Molecular Clouds (n

H>104 cm

-3

)

Dust Grains catalyze the formation of H

2

, H

2

O, …

Oxygen bound to interstellar silicates (~30%)

Simulations of Chemical Evolution indicate that H

2

O (ice) is a major O reservoir

(~50-60% of “

volatile”oxygen )

How?Slide48

Dust Grain Surfaces Catalyze Chemical Reactions

A

B

AB

Dust Grain Surface

(T~10-20 K)

Evaporation

Diffusion

ΔtSlide49

H2

O Formation in Dense Molecular Clouds (T~10 K)

Two

surface

reaction networks are believed to be responsible for the formation H

2

O :

E

A

= 1200 K ?

E

A

= 0 K (Ioppolo et al., 2008)

O+O

O2H+O2

HO2

HO2+HH2O2

H2O2+HH

2O+OH

Tielens and Hagens, A&A, 1982

Cuppen Herbst

, ApJ, 2007Ruffle &

Herbst, MNRAS, 2000

# 1Slide50

H2

O Formation in Dense Molecular Clouds (T~10 K)

Most favored pathway involves O

3

!

E

A

= 0 K

O

2

+O 

O

3

H+O

3 OH+O

2H+OHH2O or H

2+OHH2O+H

Tielens and Hagens, A&A

, 1982Cuppen Herbst,

ApJ, 2007Ruffle &

Herbst, MNRAS, 2000

# 2Slide51

Isotopic Evolution of Cloud

O

2

+O

O

3

H+

O

3

O

H+O

2

H+OHH2

O or H2+O

HH2O+HSlide52

The Distribution of Oxygen Isotopes in the Solar System

TFL

δ

18

O

δ

17

O

Mars

Terrestrial Rainwater

Asteroidal

H

2

O

Chondrules

Terrestrial Rocks

SMOW (Earth)

(-60,-60), Δ

17

O~ -26.5± 5.6 ‰

10

20

-20

-40

-10

-20

20

40

Calcium-Aluminum Inclusions

(4.56

Gyrs

.)

The Sun ?

-60

-80

-100

-30

?

Solar Wind ?

(-99, -79)

Δ

17

O(H

2

O-nebula) =Δ

17

O(Sun)+

ψ

if

Ψ

= 25-35 ‰Slide53

Current and Future Work

Ozone formation on surfaces at 10-30 K and multi-oxygen isotopic measurements

Our understanding of isotopic fractionation and surface chemistry in interstellar conditions (T~10 K) is very limited and is an exciting area of current and future researchSlide54

GeologySlide55

Concluding Remarks

Physical Chemistry 

Geochemical Observations

Physical

Chemistry

Isotopic fractionation associated with kinetic processes such as Ozone

formation are greatly affected by details of the Transition State

Short meta-stable Transition States can lead to non-equilibrium

population of Quantum states

MIFSlide56

Application of Transition State Theory to

Understand Isotopic Fractionation in aComplex Geochemical System:

Isotopic Fractionation in a Thermal Gradient

G. Dominguez

, G. Wilkins, and M. Thiemens

On the

Soret

Effect and Isotopic Fractionation in High Temperature Silicate Melts

Nature

, 2011Slide57

Fickian DiffusionSlide58

Thermal (Soret) DiffusionSlide59

A Transition State Theory Rate of DiffusionSlide60

Transition State Theory Provides Basis for Mass-Dependence of Diffusion Phenomena Slide61

Diffusion Model Explains Both Elemental and Isotopic Fractionation in Thermal Gradients

One parameter (

κ

*) explains isotopic fractionation of Mg, Ca, Fe, and Si (?) and O(?)

Dominguez

et al.,

Nature, 2011