PPT-Sharing Features Between Visual Tasks at Different Levels o

Author : giovanna-bartolotta | Published Date : 2016-06-10

Sung Ju Hwang 1 Fei Sha 2 and Kristen Grauman 1 1 University of Texas at Austin 2 University of Southern California Problem Sharing features between sub superclasses

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Sharing Features Between Visual Tasks at..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Sharing Features Between Visual Tasks at Different Levels o: Transcript


Sung Ju Hwang 1 Fei Sha 2 and Kristen Grauman 1 1 University of Texas at Austin 2 University of Southern California Problem Sharing features between sub superclasses A single visual instance can have multiple labels at different levels of semantic granularity. Clustering and Bag of . Words Representations. Many slides adapted from. Svetlana . Lazebnik. , . Fei. -Fei. Li, Rob Fergus, and Antonio . Torralba. Announcements. HW1 due . Thurs. , Sept . 27 @ 12pm. Group presentation. Region 10 . GROUP A.  . (Lucy Davis. , . Monica Degrate. , . Nkeiruka Dike. , . Mindy Allen. What Is cvi?. Cortical . Visual Impairment (CVI) is an acquired bilateral visual acuity loss caused by brain damage to the occipital lobes and/or damage to the posterior (. Summarizing Web Pages for Search and Revisitation. Jaime Teevan, Ed Cutrell, Danyel Fisher, Steven Drucker, . G. onzalo Ramos, Paul André. 1. , Chang Hu. 2. Microsoft Corporation. 1. University of Southampton . Recognition tasks. Machine learning approach: training, testing, generalization. Example classifiers. Nearest neighbor. Linear classifiers. Image features. Spatial support:. Pixel or local patch. Segmentation region. Origin 1: Texture recognition. Texture is characterized by the repetition of basic elements or . textons. For stochastic textures, it is the identity of the textons, not their spatial arrangement, that matters. Finish attention lectures this week. No class Tuesday next week. What should you do instead?. Start memory Thursday next week. Read Oliver Sacks – The Lost Mariner for Thursday (26. th. ). Read Elizabeth Loftus (For the following week). www.tatalab.ca. Reminder: extra credit experiments . www.tatalab.ca. Upcoming Reading. Vokey. and Read – Subliminal Messages . Tuesday next week. Visual Search: finding a single item in a cluttered visual scene. *. , William . Thies. #. , . Edward . Cutrell. #. , . Ravin. . Balakrishnan. *. *. University of Toronto. #. Microsoft Research India. mClerk. : Enabling Mobile Crowdsourcing in Developing Regions. Prior efforts either have middle-class workers.. . Summarizing Web Pages for Search and Revisitation. Jaime Teevan, Ed Cutrell, Danyel Fisher, Steven Drucker, . G. onzalo Ramos, Paul André. 1. , Chang Hu. 2. Microsoft Corporation. 1. University of Southampton . Sung . Ju. Hwang. 1. , . Fei. Sha. 2. and Kristen Grauman. 1. 1 University . of Texas at . Austin, 2 University of Southern California. Problem. Experimental results. Conclusion/Future Work. Kay Ousterhout. *. , . Aurojit. Panda. *. , Joshua Rosen. *. , . Shivaram. . Venkataraman. *. , . Reynold. . Xin. *. ,. Sylvia . Ratnasamy. *. , Scott . Shenker. * . , Ion . Stoica. *. *. UC Berkeley, . two dimensional. , . scaled. . down . representation. of . selected geospatial information . within a . ‘. geographical . area of interest. .’ . The . size and type of the . display medium. as well as the map’s . 0ELCT 111FRAIR-TO-AIR COMBATHUlvi Kevin W Dixon Capt USAFM Gretchen M Krueger 11-t USAFVictoria A Rojas 1 Lt USAFA Elizabeth 1 MartinN OPERATIONS TRAINING DIVISIONWilliams Air Force Base Arizona 85240 An Investigation of Potential Neural Mechanisms. Andrew Clement & Nestor Matthews – Department of Psychology, Denison University. Discussion. Experiment 1 yielded a typical pattern of results in which there was an LVF advantage for T2|T1 accuracy but not for T1 accuracy. However, there were no significant differences between the synchronous and asynchronous paradigms, suggesting that the visual system’s speed limit is set locally (separately in the two visual fields) rather than globally (across visual fields)..

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Sharing Features Between Visual Tasks at Different Levels o"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents