PPT-Use Inductive Reasoning Objectives
Author : giovanna-bartolotta | Published Date : 2018-11-02
To form conjectures through inductive reasoning To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample To avoid fallacies of inductive reasoning Example 1 Youre at school
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Use Inductive Reasoning Objectives" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Use Inductive Reasoning Objectives: Transcript
To form conjectures through inductive reasoning To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample To avoid fallacies of inductive reasoning Example 1 Youre at school eating lunch You ingest some air while eating which causes you to belch Afterward you notice a number of students staring at you with disgust You burp again and looks of distaste greet your natural bodily function You have similar experiences over the course of the next couple of days Finally you conclude that belching in public is socially unacceptable The process that lead you to this conclusion is called. A. rgue . S. uccessfully. Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Introduction. “Logic has been a formal academic discipline for . almost 2,500 years. For much of western history, logic was one of the main branches of schooling (the classical curriculum consisted of grammar, logic and rhetoric - Language used to persuade or influence others). With the growth of more specialized disciplines and wider curricula in the 20th century, formal logic got lost in the shuffle. In its place, philosophers began formulating courses in what we now call critical thinking, or informal logic.” (FactCheckEd.org, 2008). Deductive reasoning. , also . deductive logic. or . logical deduction. or, informally, . ". top-down. " logic. , is the process of . reasoning. from one or more . statements. (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. It differs from . J. Blackmon. David Hume. Bertrand Russell. Wesley Salmon. Jonathan Vogel. David Hume. Brief Biography. 1711-1776, Scottish. The History of England. Influential in ethics, psychology, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion. . Summer 2009. 1. THE inductive Bible Study method. 2. How and Why to Read Books. The Bible is a special book. Divinely inspired, living and active. Studying literature vs. studying the Bible. English Scholars have many methods and can have many purposes for interpretation. It’s Logical. What is Logic?. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. . – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts. .. There are two main types of reasoning:. A Framework for Audience Analysis. Background. Logic has been a formal academic discipline for almost 2,500 years. The 4th century B.C.E. Greek philosopher Aristotle first systematized formal logic, and university logic courses teach Aristotelian logic to this day. For much of western history, logic was one of the main branches of schooling (the classical curriculum consisted of grammar, logic and rhetoric). With the growth of more specialized disciplines and wider curricula in the 20th century, formal logic got lost in the shuffle. In its place, philosophers began formulating courses in what we now call critical thinking, or informal logic. Formal rules and the reduction of sentences to things like. Ch. 2.1. Inductive Reasoning. - uses a number of specific examples to arrive at a conclusion.. used . in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or . behavior . derived . using facts and instances which lead to the formation of a general . Lecture Outline. Inductive Reasoning. Generalizations. Cause and Effect. Analogy. Deductive Reasoning. Syllogism. Enthymeme. Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning: Review. The process of citing a number of specific examples or . Thinking Mathematically. Objectives. Understand mathematical reasoning . Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning . Identify . arithmetic and geometric sequences . Thinking Mathematically. Inductive Reasoning . When you use a pattern to find the next term in a sequence you’re using . inductive reasoning.. The conclusion you’ve made about the next terms in the pattern are called a . Induction vs Deduction. Fogelin. and . Sinnott. -Armstrong describe the difference between induction and deduction as follows:. Deductive arguments are intended to be valid. Inductive arguments are not intended to be valid but still to provide a reason for the conclusion. Note-Taking Guide. I suggest only writing down things written in . red. Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning. What was our definition of inductive reasoning (section 2.1)?. Process of looking for patterns, making a conjecture, and then attempting to prove the conjecture true or false. - Charles Sanders Peirce. On the Radar. Researching the Persuasive Speech Assignment. Due Wednesday on . WebCT. (by 11:59 p.m.). Exam Two. This Friday in Lecture. Study Guide on Course Website. Workshops for the Persuasive Speech. Tewoderos. . Ayele. University of Utah. Inductive Effect. Eric . Anslyn. and Dennis Dougherty, . Modern Physical Organic Chemistry. , University Science Books; pp 15-18. Overview:. An inductive effect occurs when the electrons shared between two atoms or groups of different .
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Use Inductive Reasoning Objectives"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents