/
SRHE Seminar 19 March 2013 SRHE Seminar 19 March 2013

SRHE Seminar 19 March 2013 - PowerPoint Presentation

goldengirl
goldengirl . @goldengirl
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-29

SRHE Seminar 19 March 2013 - PPT Presentation

Higher education provision in further education colleges some findings and methodological considerations Anne Thompson What is it HE in FE HE in FECs College based HE HEFCE HE in FECs is already a distinctive part of the HE system While it is dangerous to overgeneralise about a divers ID: 810677

students education hefce higher education students higher hefce fecs data colleges provision time 2012 funding 2013 funded college qualifications

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "SRHE Seminar 19 March 2013" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

SRHE Seminar19 March 2013

Higher education provision in further education colleges: some findings and methodological considerations

Anne Thompson

Slide2

What is it?

HE in FE

HE in FECs

College based HE

Slide3

HEFCE

‘HE in FECs is already a distinctive part of the HE system. While it is dangerous to over-generalise about a diverse system, HE students in FECs are more likely to be over 25, more likely to study part-time, and more likely to come from areas with low rates of participation in HE than students in HEIs. They are more likely to be studying foundation degrees and sub-degree programmes such as HNCs and HNDs.’

(Para

32,

Higher education in further education colleges. Consultation on HEFCE policy

. HEFCE, November

2006/48)

2009

:

all directly and indirectly funded colleges required to submit a higher education strategy to HEFCE by January 2010 to cover all higher level provision (including NPHE)

(Request for higher education strategies from further education colleges

, March 2009/13)

Slide4

What is higher education?

Above level 3/level 4 and above

National Qualifications Framework (NQF) - from 1997 all accredited general and vocational qualifications. Originally five levels with 4 and 5 being HE. Now nine levels - entry to level 8

NQF and

QAA Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (

FHEQ) aligned at levels 4 to 8 in 2004, NVQ 4 and 5 not

reallocated

Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF) -regulated vocational qualifications offered by recognised Awarding Organisations. Nine levels – entry to level 8

Slide5

Funding of HE in FECs

HEFCE funding:

p

rescribed HE

d

irect funding (whole qualifications only) - students registered at the FEC

i

ndirect funding - via a franchise arrangement. Students registered at the HEI but taught at the FEC

SFA funding:

n

on prescribed HE (NPHE) – awards at level 4 and above on the QCF

e

xcluding full cost provision

Slide6

Data returns

Different data returns are made with different timescales and requirements.

HEFCE funded HE:

w

here funding is indirect, the HEI includes the students taught at the FEC on their HESA return as well as on the Higher Education Students Early Statistics Survey (HESES)

FECs with direct funding make the return via the ILR to the Data Service and their early return to HEFCE, the

Higher

Education in Further

Education: Student Survey (HEIFES). The two sets of data are subsequently (after end of year) reconciled by HEFCE

NPHE:

r

eturned on the ILR

t

he definition of full-time and part-time varies from HEFCE’s

a

s do the subject categories

Slide7

Understanding higher education in further education colleges, BIS Research Report Number 69, June 2012

Conducted March 2011 to March 2012:

l

iterature review

s

tatistical analysis of administrative data on provision and participation

f

ieldwork in 25 FECs – interviews with college managers; HEI partners; questionnaire survey of students; in class discussions with students

interviews with employers – national and collaborators with colleges

Slide8

National data analysis

Integrated data set for 2009-10:

constructed using ‘fuzzy matching’ across the ILR and HESA

a

nalytical work undertaken by HEFCE, using model previously developed by University of Sheffield

Categories of higher education used:

Postgraduate

Bachelor’s (first degree)

Other undergraduate (FDs, HNs, Dip and Cert HE)

Other higher level

Slide9

Provision 2009-10

177,260 taught in FECs. 8% of the HE population

283 out of 349 FECs provided HE. Mainly in general FECs (224 out of 225) and specialist institutions (25 out of 33)

61% undergraduate; 36% other higher level; 3% postgraduate

60% part-time overall but, for undergraduate, 55% full-time

31% of students were directly funded by HEFCE; 33% indirectly; 18% by LSC/SFA and 17% Other

m

ost colleges had more than one funding route; 37% had three

i

ndirect funding partnerships involved 245 colleges and 68 HEIs

Slide10

contd

a minority of FECs accounted for the majority of HE students

compared to HEIs, students in FECs were older

20% of new entrants taught at FECs were from low participation areas compared to 11% for HEIs with the gap being wider for young entrants than for older entrants

t

hose joining undergraduate courses had a broader range of entry qualifications – fewer with A levels and more with level 3 vocational qualifications or lower level qualifications

b

ut more of the students taught in FECs than those taught in HEIs had HE qualifications – many would have had an FD or HN and progressed into the final year of a bachelor’s

Slide11

Fieldwork – 25 FECs

Selection of 25 colleges using the integrated data set for 2006-07

t

otal of 299 colleges reduced to those with 400+ numbers = 150

s

tatistical selection taking into account volume and region

f

or each college, target quotas totalling 100 identified for qualification aim (Bachelor, Other UG and Other HE) by mode (FT, PT)

Fieldworkers negotiated with college managers to identify appropriate groups to administer questionnaires to meet targets as well as one in-class discussion group per college

Slide12

Methodological issues

For selection of 25 case studies:

integrated data set (the only one available) was for 2006-07

mergers had to be taken into account

For

identification of

quotas:

it became evident volume and balance of

qual

aims had changed since 2006-07

t

he fieldworkers negotiated with college managers to identify groups to meet the targets in summer 2011 but the questionnaires were administered in autumn 2011 and patterns of provision shifted (over and under recruitment)

During the

project,

2009-10 data became available but the

questionnaire responses

were gathered in

2011-12

Slide13

NPHE

For NPHE, there were particular problems in meeting the targets leading to these students being excluded from the main analysis:

NPHE and HEFCE-funded HE are often managed separately and/or the data collected in separate MIS

the

patterns of provision had shifted considerably – usually a decline but not always – apparently due to withdrawal of SFA funding which had led to withdrawal of provision or a shift to full cost

funding

w

here provision was identified, the staff and/or the students often refused to participate in the project because it would eat into very limited contact time for which significant fees were usually being paid

Slide14

Questionnaire findings

2,523 undergraduate students (Bachelor and Other UG):

o

verall the students had traditional undergraduate characteristics (female, aged 24 and under, white, single, childless with highest qualification 2 A levels or equivalent) but were mainly non-traditional in that neither parent had an HE qualification

t

he majority were aiming for an FD and studied full-time on a course directly funded by HEFCE

t

heir motives for entering HE were primarily instrumental

a

round 2/3rds had only applied to study at this college. This and the selection of the college because it was close to home/work or because they had previously studied there led the author to question whether they were making an informed choice

a

minority thought they had chosen to apply to a university

Slide15

UCAS – applications and enrolment

One of the findings from the student questionnaires which attracted attention was that 1 in 10 students did not realise they were applying to a college rather than a university. It may not be apparent to an applicant to a franchised course going via UCAS that it is not taught at the HEI

2013/03 notes that around 40% of applicants to FECs do not go through UCAS which limits the availability of early data on FEC applications.

Slide16

Updates

Slide17

HEFCE funded provision

In 2012-13 187 FECs receive direct funding from HEFCE

65 of these were not in receipt of direct funding in 2011-12 but were allocated numbers from the 20,000 places made available under the ‘margin’.

155 FECs collectively received 10,354 places.

It appears that c 2,700 are unfilled (compared to 4,000 at HEIs).

The colleges undershooting were largely those with smaller allocations (under 75).

(HEFCE 2013/03)

Slide18

Widening participation and non-continuation indicators for further education colleges. Overview of trends HEFCE, August 2012, 2012/20

U

sing ILR and HESA data 2008-09 to 2009-10

Previously UK HE performance indicators did not include (prescribed) HE provision for students registered at FECs. Now to be produced annually

In FECs the proportions of registered entrants who were from low participation neighbourhoods (LPNs) were higher than those proportions of taught entrants

Slide19

Destinations of leavers from higher education in further education colleges. Key findings: leavers up to academic year 2010-11. HEFCE, January 2013, 2013/01

The first publication of destination information for higher education provision registered at HEFCE-funded FECs

Previously the data for franchised students (i.e. registered at HEIs) was captured in the HEI’s data but not that for directly funded students (i.e. registered at the FEC)

Derived from responses to the Higher Education in Further Education Destinations of Leavers from the Higher Education (HE in FE DLHE) survey 2008-09 to 2010-11

To be produced annually

Slide20

Shaping the future: opportunities for HE provision in FE colleges. MEG and 157 Group, 157 Group, October 2012

Report of a survey conducted May 2012 among members of MEG and the 157 Group:

u

ses data for 2009-10 provided by HEFCE but survey data is for 2010-11

f

ound it difficult to capture data on NPHE. Notes the volume of full cost funded NPHE is not collected

Slide21

Higher education in England. Impact of the 2012 reforms, HEFCE, March 2013, 2013/03

Contains data on 2012-13 enrolment and trends.

Includes a section ‘How have further education colleges which offer higher education been affected?’ summarising numbers and reporting on the results of the survey conducted between November 2012 and January 2013 asking colleges about opportunities and challenges for the college and their students (p43).

Slide22

2013/03 - HEFCE funded numbers in FECs

Full-time undergraduate provision in FECs grew overall between 2011-12 and 2012-13

Franchise numbers dropped by slightly more than 4,000 (almost 15%)

But directly funded places increased by 7,500 (26%)

Overall (direct and franchise) the number of full-time undergraduates increased by around 3,500 (almost 6%)

Slide23

2013/03 - Recruitment

The drop in

overall full-time

undergraduate applications and acceptances (UK applicants) is much greater for mature students

There

was a significant fall in part-time recruitment to HE overall, especially for undergraduate provision. Part-time students are more likely to be non-traditional and to be mature

Colleges reported

(in the survey) a drop

in demand for part-time courses because of a reluctance to take out student loans particularly among mature students

Slide24

2013/03 - Partnerships

HEFCE reports indications from HEIs that FECs are filling their own places before franchise places which ‘would be a contributing factor to under-recruitment at universities’. ‘These and other issues are causing some universities to review their franchise provision, leading in some cases to withdrawals from these partnerships’.

(

para

100)

Slide25

Links

Understanding higher education in further education colleges. BIS Research paper number 69, June 2012. Gareth Parry, University of Sheffield, Claire

Callender

, Peter Scott and Paul Temple, Institute of Education, University of London.

https://

www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-higher-education-in-further-education-colleges

http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/lt/heinfe

/

http://www.aoc.co.uk/en/policy-and-advice/higher-education

/

HE in FE Guide,

AoC

supported by LSIS,

AoC

2012. Also on the HEA website

http://

www.heacademy.ac.uk/he-in-fe