/
Howard Davidson Director, ABA Center on Children and Howard Davidson Director, ABA Center on Children and

Howard Davidson Director, ABA Center on Children and - PowerPoint Presentation

greyergy
greyergy . @greyergy
Follow
345 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-17

Howard Davidson Director, ABA Center on Children and - PPT Presentation

t he Law howarddavidsonamericanbarorg Developments in Law and Policy Affecting Child Protective Services 2015 16th ABA NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHILDREN amp THE LAW Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Webpage ID: 780802

children child state care child children care state foster information law youth welfare abuse cps agencies fatality parent services

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Howard Davidson Director, ABA Center on ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Howard DavidsonDirector, ABA Center on Children and the Lawhoward.davidson@americanbar.org

Developments in Law and Policy Affecting Child Protective Services-- 2015

Slide2

16th

ABA NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHILDREN & THE LAW

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Webpage

Slide3

New ABA Publication on Foster Home Licensing

http://

grandfamilies.org/Portals/0/ Model%20Licensing%20 Standards%20FINAL.pdf

Includes a “Cross-Walk Tool” that allows users to compare the Model with their own current state standards and laws

We are also hosting one-day Regional Kinship Care Summits (“Improving Family Connections: A Legal Focus on Extended Families”)

Published by the National Association for Regulatory Administration

Slide4

In 2014: our CLP continued to report on key appellate court decisions, e.g., many state cases on termination of parental rights and new federal cases on child welfare agency liability

CLP also had a feature article series on 1) children with disabilities who are victims of abuse/neglect and 2) trauma-informed legal practices,

plus

legal articles on, e.g., “failure to train” lawsuits, child trafficking, immigrant families, restoration of parental rights, liability protections, broken adoptions, child competency, homeless & transitioning foster youth, the ICPC, and foster youth education outcomes

Slide5

Children’s Bureau’s Capacity-Building Center for Courts Jennifer.Renne@americanbar.org

Parent Representation / “Reunification Day” / LGBTQ Issues

Mimi.Laver@americanbar.org

Older Youth in Foster Care / Transitioning YouthKristin.Kelly@americanbar.orgKinship (Grandfamilies State Law & Policy Resource Center)

Heidi.Epstein@americanbar.orgChild Trauma / Child Trafficking / Health IssuesEva.Klain@americanbar.orgState Permanency Barriers Removal / Trial Skills Training

AnneMarie.Lancour@americanbar.orgImmigration IssuesCristina.Cooper@americanbar.orgICPC / ICWA Issues

Scott.Trowbridge@americanbar.orgLegal Center for Foster Care and EducationKathleen.McNaught@americanbar.org

Slide6

Slide7

                                                16th ABA National Conference on

Children and the Law

Advancing Access to Justice for

Children and FamiliesJuly 24-25, 2015                                                                                Pre-Conference on Kinship Care

July 23, 2015

Slide8

Proposed New AFCARS State Reporting Elements(to be in 45 CFR Part 1355)

HHS proposed in the Federal Register on 2/9/15

new

data elements to better understand characteristics of children in foster care and provide better context for their outcomes. Some examples:Timeliness of written plans to transition youth out of foster careChild’s

educational level, educational stability and involvement with special educationType of child’s existing and previous health, behavioral and mental health conditions, and timeliness of health assessments

Types of group placements children are in

Slide9

Timeliness /frequency of caseworker visits with childrenData on child entering care after sex traffickingData on minor parents who have their children with them in foster care, sibling groups and whether or

not siblings

are placed together

Children’s past domestic and inter-country adoptions and prior adoptions and guardianshipsNew elements to better track Tribal, State and Federal financial support of foster care, adoption and guardianships

Involvement with juvenile justice agenciesSome have proposed requiring state data on children in foster care who have a parent who was detained or deported by immigration authorities, as well as data on the immigration status of children in foster care

Slide10

9/29/14 President Obama Signs the First Major Federal Child Welfare Law Since 2011Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act

(H.R. 4980), P.L. 113-183

16 key elements

Foster youth who go missing from care must be promptly reported to police and NCMEC (11/4 CB I.M. on CW links to runaway & homeless youth programs)APPLA is prohibited for children under 16Every permanency hearing has a new requirement of documenting “intensive, ongoing, unsuccessful efforts for family placement”

Care providers must be prepared and supported to promote “child normalcy” -- with liability protection for reasonable and prudent parenting

Slide11

Early State Law Model for This:CA Welfare & Institutions Code §362.04 and .05

“Reasonable and prudent parent” or “reasonable and prudent parent standard” means the standard characterized by careful and sensible parental decisions that maintain the child’s health, safety, and best

interest

“Every child adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court shall be entitled to participate in age-appropriate extracurricular, enrichment, and social activities. No state or local regulation or policy may prevent, or create barriers to, participation in those activities.”

Slide12

“Each…entity shall ensure that…agencies that provide foster care services to dependent children have policies consistent with this section and that those agencies promote and protect the ability of dependent children to participate in age-appropriate extracurricular, enrichment, and social activities. A group home administrator, a facility manager, or his or her responsible designee, and a

caregiver…shall

use a reasonable and prudent parent

standard…in determining whether to give permission for a child residing in foster care to participate in extracurricular, enrichment, and social activities.” “A group home administrator, a facility manager, or his or her responsible designee, and a caregiver shall take reasonable steps to determine the appropriateness of the activity in consideration of the child’s age, maturity, and developmental level. [They are] encouraged to consult with social work or treatment staff members who are most familiar with the child at the group home in applying and using the reasonable and prudent parent standard

.”

Slide13

With every remaining APPLA plan, child must be asked at hearings about their desired permanency outcome, and there must be a judicial finding of “compelling reasons” to keep APPLA as the planEvery foster youth age 14 and over must be informed they can select up to two people to be involved in their case planning

Those 18 and over leaving care must now get their birth certificate, social security card, health insurance information, medical records, and drivers license or official state ID card

Those 14 and over in care must also be given a “rights document” addressing their right to education, health, visitation, and court participation

Slide14

Examples of These “Rights Documents”Connecticut General Statutes 17a-16 Rights of children and

youth

under the supervision of the Commissioner of Children and

FamiliesMassachusetts Foster Child Bill of RightsPublished by the MA Department of Children and Families and developed by the Department’s Youth Advisory Board

Slide15

In FY16, states will have to report to AFCARS data on children in congregate care, and on pregnant and parenting youth in careNew foster placement “notice” extension: to all parents of any sibling of the child in care, where the parent has custody of that sibling

States will have to develop new child welfare agency policies, procedures, and training on addressing child sex trafficking victims

In two years, state will have to report to HHS number of child sex trafficking victims who entered care, and those who became victims while in care

State “Adoption Incentives” is modified to include Permanent Legal Guardianships and more $ for kids 14 and over and for “timely” permanency

Slide16

The “Incentive” payments from HHS must now be used to supplement other money by adding new servicesA portion of state savings from the AFDC IV-E “Phase Out” must now be spent on post-adoption and post-guardianship services

Federally subsidized guardianship of a child

can be continued if a guardian dies and is succeeded by another guardian

Slide17

7/22/14 President Signs New Employment Training Law with Foster Care ImplicationsThe Workforce Innovation and Opportunities Act P.L. 113-128

Law focuses on helping job seekers access jobs, training, and support to succeed in labor market

Enhances federal support for Out-of-School Youth, defined to include “youth who are in or have aged out of foster care system” (includes youth in Chafee Act programs or any out-of-home placement)

The youth formula grant funds share for Out-of-School Youth goes up from 30% to 75%

Slide18

ACYF Information Memoranda of Interest5-30-14 ACYF-CB-IM-14-02

Re-homing

of adopted children; responsibilities for states and opportunities in provision of post-adoption services (AR, CO, FL, LA, WI have laws on this)States are encouraged to develop and provide a continuum of post-adoption services for adoptive families, both domestic and international, and HHS reminds states that they may use IV-B $ for such services for both types of adoptive families, and that families may use “family preservation funds” under PSSF law (IV-B, subpart 2), Adoption Incentive $, & re-investment of savings from IV-E de-linking from AFDCHHS says 45% of 45 state child welfare agencies responding helped international adoptive familiesIn one study, only 26%

of adoptive families in the U.S. felt they received quality mental health services

Slide19

Commission created by the “Protect Our Kids Act

– P.L. 112–275 (1/14/13)

I presented on this issue at their July 2014 meeting

Slide20

HHS Seeks Comments: CAPTA Guidance on State Disclosure of Information on Child FatalitiesOn 3/31/15 HHS published in Federal

Register

a

request for comments related to public disclosure of findings or information about a case of child abuse or neglect which results in a child fatality or near fatality, includingChallenges obtaining information from states about child fatalities/near fatalities which resulted from abuse or neglect Concerns about the state’s definition of “near fatalities”States saying that they cannot disclose information due to confidentiality protections, and why Availability of public reports from child fatality review

panels/commissions, and the content of those

Slide21

HHS Says CW Must Release, At a Minimum Upon Request, After a Child

F

atality or Near-Fatality…

Causes of and circumstances regarding the fatality or near fatalityAge and gender of that childInformation on any previous reports of abuse or neglectInvestigations pertinent to the abuse or neglect that led to the fatality or near fatality

Result of such investigationsServices provided by, and actions of the State, on behalf of that child, that are pertinent to the abuse or neglect that led to the fatality or near fatality

Slide22

Release of CPS Information in Other CasesStates should consider, and CAPTA may need to explicitly permit, laws (as in AK, AZ, CO, CT, IL, KS, KY, LA, ME, MI, MT, NB, NY, SC) permitting some CPS information

disclosures to the public

,

in other than fatality/near fatality cases, if those cases become otherwise publicized, so that CPS actions in that case can be made clearElisa’s Law in NY (1996) enacted following a very publicized child death – Social Services Law 422-a Permits disclosure unless the commissioner/director finds it would

not be in the best interests of the child, the child’s siblings, or other children in the home to release the information

Slide23

Key Reforms in Release of CPS Records and Access to Information Related to Child SafetyState laws should mandate

“feedback” to reporters

of abuse/neglect, at least upon request by professional reporters, that includes the CPS investigation results and child welfare agency actions later taken

Cross-state CPS record sharing and access should be clearly mandated for social services, licensing, and law enforcement agencies upon request, especially if a maltreating parent has left the state (This is important due to the mobility of families involved in child maltreatment)

Slide24

States should consider, and CAPTA may need to explicitly permit, laws (like Elisa’s Law in New York State) permitting some CPS information disclosures to the public, in other than fatality/near fatality cases, if cases become otherwise publicized, so CPS actions in a case can be made clearThere should be explicit legal authority for public release of information about children missing from foster care, group care, or from homes where they’ve been under protective supervision (This is related to

compliance with the new

federal legislation)

Slide25

State laws should improve immunity protections for those who CPS asks to assist it in serving abused or neglected children (Fear of liability inhibits professionals from sharing information and aiding maltreated children)

CPS agencies should develop and utilize – with

parents –

voluntary, standard, and clearly understandable consent/release of information forms permitting release of otherwise confidential information that not only addresses child welfare information but also acknowledges HIPAA, FERPA, and Substance Abuse Treatment record protections

Slide26

State laws (often misapplying a CAPTA provision) have limited a future child protection/safety tool: The use of earlier unsubstantiated reports by, for example, expunging them from access (This must be changed in state that require destruction of past unsubstantiated reports)State laws should clearly mandate appropriate “cross-reporting” from CPS to police and prosecutors, and vice-versa (e.g., in physical and sex abuse cases)

State laws should permit the sharing of abuse/neglect information, as appropriate, about a child at Family Team Meetings (e.g., NJ permits this)

Slide27

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-248), in addition to mandating prospective foster /adoptive parent background checks, and requiring CPS Central Registry checks from all states where a parent lived in the last 5 years, includes a little-known provision

giving CPS agencies opportunity for direct access

to a important

potential child safety tool, the FBI’s National Crime Information databases, for use during “an investigation relating to an incident of child abuse or neglect” (e.g., data on felony arrests/convictions, sex offender data,

probation/parole information)

Slide28

Child safety should be enhanced by doing record checks of adults in the home during an investigation, and especially after substantiation or prior to reunification – so that workers will be aware of adults with violent criminal histories that suggest they may endanger childrenChild welfare agencies should apply for FBI NCIC terminal access to securely run these checks from within the agency (FL was first state to do so)State law should also authorize, for any adult in the home, that state criminal history on

that adult be accessible for child protection purposes as part of any investigation [e.g., VA §63.2-1505(C)]

Slide29

Handling Cases Involving Unaccompanied Immigrant Minors – The SIJS IssueSince October 2013 almost 2,500 of these children have been released by HHS/ORR to “sponsors” in the New England States2/20/15 HHS/CB issued an Information Memorandum (ACYF-CB-IM-15-02) to advice child welfare agencies on handling cases for families affected by immigration enforcement (referencing the 2013 ICE Parental Interests Directive and the Unaccompanied Children/SIJS issue)

ICE Memo:

www.ice.gov/doclib/detention-reform/ pdf/parental_interest_directive_signed.pdf

Slide30

Our Center is working with an ABA Presidential Working Group on Unaccompanied Minors re. the SIJS issue (obtaining SIJS findings in state court)HHS Memo said child welfare agencies should screen all children in care without immigration status for SIJS eligibility status and provide support to help those children get that statusChild may come into care if their placement with a sponsor disruptsFamilies “sponsoring” these children may need legal help obtaining guardianship/custody orders along with a court order with written “findings” of “dependency”, not being returned to parent due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment , & that return to home country is not in their best interests

Slide31

Helping Assure Compliance With the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)On March 20, 2015 the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, issued proposed “Regulations for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings”

These followed upon new 2/19/15 BIA “Guidelines for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings”

Goal of both of these is to help assure that child welfare agencies and courts effectively comply with ICWA, assuring

in every case that an inquiry is made as to whether this law applies, and that the law is fully complied with

Slide32

Caseworkers, agency administrators, and judges must be given information so they know, e.g.: When ICWA appliesWhen ICWA’s required “active efforts” to prevent removal from an Indian parent or custodian applyWhat time limits and extensions apply to safeguard the rights of Indian parents

T

he process for removing an Indian child in an emergency

What special rights Indian parents have in these casesWhen the court must involve a “qualified expert witness” in these cases and who can serve as suchHow to apply the Act’s placement preferencesHow to make the “good cause” exception from these

Slide33

U.S. Supreme Court CaseOhio v. ClarkCert petition granted on October 2, 2015

Docket

Number

13-1352 Decision expected this termOhio Attorney General appealed decision of their state’s Supreme Court, holding that a teacher eliciting child abuse information from a 3½ year old was acting as a state law enforcement agent and that the child’s statements about abuse were elicited in a non-emergency situation and primarily for criminal justice purposes, and thus they were testimonial in nature and should not have been admitted at criminal trial.

Slide34

Dissent said the majority decision threatens the safety of children and creates a beneficial catch-22 for pedophiles and other abusers of children. It said that because of this decision children in Ohio will go unprotected. Said there is no indication the Ohio legislature intended to deputize mandated reporters as agents of law enforcement.

Majority

opinion calls the dissent a passionate rant and a

“parade of horribles”.

Slide35

18 Elements of Continuing Problems in 8 States with Class Action Consent DecreesGetting all foster children health services

Quality of many case plans remain poor

Not enough relative and non-relative foster homes, and overuse of shelters/institutional placements

Caseloads still above court-ordered limitsStill too many poor quality & untimely investigationsToo few children who’ve been in care a year or longer are getting permanent homes

Too many children are in unlicensed homesStruggles to report accurate child welfare data

Slide36

Visitation frequency remains a problem for foster children (with both caseworkers, separated siblings, and parents) – also, lack of parental visits by their caseworkers is a problemToo many foster children still having two or more school placements during their first year in care

Too many children who are leaving care are re-entering care within a year

Too many children are waiting for adoption after TPR

Double-digit maltreatment by substitute caregiversToo many children not fully assessed on their needs

Family reunification % goals set were not met

Slide37

Too many foster parents still not getting the support they believe they need to meet their role and responsibilitiesToo many foster parents still not receiving timely and complete information on the foster children they are being asked to care for

Need to reduce the numbers of youth on runaway status from care, and the length of time they are on runaway status

Slide38

THANK YOU, CITIZEN REVIEW PANELS!I’M RETIRING FROM THE ABA IN EARLY JULY, BUT NOT FROM THE FIELD OF CHILD WELFARE LAW ENTIRELY -- I AM STILL AVAILABLE FOR SPECIAL PROJECTS AND ASSIGNMENTS

REACHABLE AT:

HOWARDADAV@YAHOO.COM

OR AT 240/437-7212