/
Research Services and Reputation Management at Dartmouth: Research Services and Reputation Management at Dartmouth:

Research Services and Reputation Management at Dartmouth: - PowerPoint Presentation

haroublo
haroublo . @haroublo
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-19

Research Services and Reputation Management at Dartmouth: - PPT Presentation

Libraries in the Mix David Seaman OCLC Research San Francisco 3 June 2015 Dartmouth College Founded 1769 Ivy League institution 6300 students 4200 undergraduates 1045 faculty 210 million sponsored research FY14 ID: 781880

dartmouth faculty management research faculty dartmouth research management library digital services service campus citation output librarian seaman scholarly infrastructure

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Research Services and Reputation Managem..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Research Services and Reputation Management at Dartmouth: Libraries in the Mix

David Seaman

OCLC Research

San Francisco, 3 June 2015

Slide2

Dartmouth CollegeFounded 1769. Ivy League institution.

6,300 students (4,200 undergraduates)

1,045 faculty.

$210 million sponsored research (FY14).

Carnegie "very high research activity”

classification.

$4.5 billion endowment.

Top 5

u

ndergraduate teaching (US News & World Report ranking).

Slide3

Background: LibraryRobust Digital Library Program, including digital publishing of journals and

ebooks

.

Active role in open access on campus, leading to May

2015 Dartmouth Faculty Open Access

Policy (sponsored by the Council on the Libraries).

Good relationships with faculty and Information Technology Services (ITS).

Strong curatorial interests regarding Dartmouth scholarship.

Slide4

Background: InstitutionInstitutional goal to increase awareness of Dartmouth

research globally.

No institutional repository -- some department repositories (computing).

No faculty profile system -- uneven updating of faculty web pages.

No central database of faculty scholarly output.

Slide5

The Service OpportunityTwo years ago we prioritized the opportunity to build coordinated campus

infrastructure to manage research and drive new services.

Strong relationship with ITS – library not going it alone – presented as a joint initiative from the beginning.

Builds on recent ITS investments in robust identity management (Oracle).

No legacy systems to work round, replace, or ignore

.

Yeehah

!

Slide6

New Campus Infrastructure

Fedora/Hydra for Dartmouth Academic Commons.

Fedora/Hydra for Dartmouth Digital Library.

Symplectic

Elements for citation management services.

Slide7

Library/ITS Co-investmentTwo full time staff positions from ITS: project director and programmer.

Digital Scholarship Librarian being hired now.

Existing Director of

Digital Resources and Scholarly Communications

in lead role.

Significant commitment from library technologists, metadata specialists, preservation librarian, and subject specialists.

Joint budget for licensed software, etc.

Slide8

Service FocusMarket the service, not the infrastructure: Faculty members quick to see advantages of research management services for annual reports, grants submissions, etc

.

Something for everyone: OA skeptics can still benefit from citation management or data management plans for grants.

High touch – much done for you, and no mandatory requirements with which to comply.

Slide9

Faculty AssessmentLibrary and ITS can demonstrate possibilities

and opportunities.

We don

t own the issue.

Faculty unease about some types of productivity measure.

Needs deep faculty conversations about individual assessment, and policy decisions by campus administration.

Slide10

Time line: 2015Build out Fedora/Hydra and install

Symplectic

Elements.

Pass Open Access Policy.

Focus on OA journal articles and selected library collections in new repository architecture.

Focus on selected departments for citation harvesting and management.

Formulate IR policies with faculty committee.

Design assessment and marketing plans.

Slide11

Future YearsFully functional repository for Dartmouth scholarship in all media.

Shared architecture between IR and digital library.

Citation management services for all Dartmouth faculty.

Slide12

ConclusionService-based: minimal work for faculty.

Output-based:

adding

value for individuals and

institutions.

Aggregates and brands Dartmouth scholarly output, making

it easily available

for reporting, PR, etc.

Broad service portfolio supporting

research through the full

lifecycle

.

Slide13

Thank You, OCLC Research!David Seaman

Associate Librarian for Information Management

Dartmouth College Library

Hanover, NH

d

avid.seaman@dartmouth.edu