PSTP2019 Knoxville Tennessee September 26 th 2019 P Lenisa University of Ferrara and INFN for the LHCspin study group 2 A bit of pre history Tefloncoated storage cell filled with polarized H proposed by Prof W ID: 785578
Download The PPT/PDF document "LHCspin : a polarized internal target fo..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
LHCspin:a polarized internal target for the LHC
PSTP2019Knoxville, Tennessee, September 26th 2019
P. Lenisa – University of Ferrara and INFNfor the LHC-spin study group
Slide22
A bit of (pre) historyTeflon-coated storage cell filled with polarized H proposed by Prof. W. Haeberli 2nd Polarization Symposium (Karlsruhe 1965)First test in Madison (Wisconsin): 5th Int. Symp. on Pol. Phenomena in Nuclear Physics (Santa Fe 1980)
Slide3Motivation
Slide44Kinematics for a fixed target at LHC
Slide55Advantages of the fixed-target mode (
wrt to collider):Access large-negative xF and large positive xB High luminosities (dense targets)Easy change target typePolarized target – spin physics programPhysics goals:Large-x gluon, antiquark and heavy-quark content in the nucleon and nucleus.Dynamics and spin of gluons in (un)-polarised nucleonsHeavy-ion collisions towards large rapiditiesFixed target mode at LHC: performance
Slide6SMOG2 development at LHCb
Slide7LHCb detector
Forward geometry
Conceived for measurements in collider modeIdeal for
fixed
target
experiments
Slide8SMOG
(System for Measuring Overlap with Gas)Beam-Gas imagingDedicated runs at different energies since 2015
Slide99Upgrade to SMOG2
installation of a storage cell in 2019 and start data taking in 2021Opened cellClosed cellLHCbVELO Detector
Slide1010
Increase luminosity up to 2 orders of magnitude with the same gas loadInjection of H2, D2, 3,4He, N2, Ne, Ar, Kr, XeWell defined interaction region upstream the IP@13TeV:Possible simultaneous data taking with pp interactions @13 TeVSMOG2 vs SMOG
Slide1111Polarized Gas Target
Slide12Atomic Beam Source
Target Gas AnalyzerSample Beam PolarimeterTarget B12Polarized atomic beam injected from left
Sample beam:QMS to measure molecular fraction.BRP polarimeter to measure atomic polarization.
The HERMES polarized internal gas target @ HERA (1995-2005)
Slide1313Performance for transversely polarized H (2002/03)
HERMES 2002/03 data taking with transverse proton polarizationTop: Degree of dissociation measured by the TGA (a = 1: no molecules);Bottom: Vector polarization Pz measured by Breit-Rabi-Polarimeter.Coating: ice layer on Drifilm surface
Slide14PGT at LHC - topology
Z= 0 LHCb - IPPrototype of the new
system:Transverse magnetAdditional tracking system
Slide1515Compatibility with LHC beams
Beam half-life: ≈ 10 hParasitic operation requires small reduction of half-life (< 10%)p beam intensities @ LHCProtons: Ip = 6.8∙1018 p/s @ 7 TeV.1s-radius at IP (full energy): < 0.02 mmNegligible compared with the cell radius (> 5 mm)Safety radius at injection (450 GeV
for p): > 25 mm “Openable” cell required.
Beam tube
Length: 300 mm (L
1
= 150 mm)
Closed: D
1
= 10 mm
.
Opened: D
1
= 50 mm
Cell temperature: T = 100 K
.
Slide1616
Polarized 1H gas target performancespp @ √s = √2MnEp ≈ 100 GeV = 50 mb = 5∙10-26 cm2Max. relative loss rate: (dN/dt)/N = 2∙10-8/s
H, Ctot
= 2 C
1
+ C
2
= 16 l/s, I = 6.5∙10
16
atoms/s (HERMES):
areal density
q
= L
1
∙
r
0
=
1.2∙10
14
atoms/cm
2
Total luminosity:
L
pp
= 8.2∙10
32
/ cm
2
s
About 5% of the collider luminosity
The H target does not affect the life time of the 7
TeV
proton beam
(A couple of) accelerator issues
Slide18Bunch beam structure and Fourier spectrum at LHC
st= 253 pssn= 0.63 GHzDn= 40.08 MHzTemporal structure of the proton
bunchFourier analysis of the proton
beam
Slide19Beam-induced depolarization (BID)1 - 2
3 - 4
2 - 4
Resonant transitions caused by beam field
Orientation of guide field
B
0
and RF - beam field
B
1
:
p
resonances
for B
1
┴
B
0
D
F = 0, ±1
D
mF
= ± 1
s
resonances
for B
1
||
B
0
D
F = ±1
D
mF
= 0.
Affect nuclear polarization.
s
resonances (
states 2-4
) densely spaced:
high homogeneity of guide field required
p-beam
Slide20Comparison HERA vs LHC
20Machine
NBunch
f
Bunch
(
MHz)
I
beam
(
A)
s
t
(
ps
)
1/e width of Fourier spectrum
HERA-e
210
10.41
0.04
31
5.1 GHz
LHC
2600
40.08
1.0
253
0.63 GHz
BID
at the LHC negligible
wrt
HERA despite the 25x higher beam current
Spin-flip Probability
s
2-4
resonance
,
q
= mixing angle,
t
= crossing time, n index of passage:
B
||
B
1
-RF
field
parallel
to
B
0
(
guide
field
≈ 300mT)
B
1
|| B
0
for
q
= 90°
.
Relative
strength
of
BID
by
ratio
of
the
square
of
B
||
:
s
2-4
transition
at 8.54 GHz
k-th
harmonic
of
Fourier
spectrum
:
LHC: F
213
= 2 ∙ 1.0 A ∙ 1.53 10
-20
HERA: F
820
= 2 ∙ 0.04 A ∙ 7.53 10
-2
Slide21Coatings for surfaces close to the LHC beam: materials with SEY ≤ 1.4 allowed
Non-Evaporable Getter (NEG) (standard)Amorphous Carbon (a-C) (tested and applied more frequently)NEG coating for the tube’s inner surface excluded because of its pumping actionH recombination and depolarization on C to be studied Option: C with frozen ice layer to preserve H polarization Secondary Electron Yield (SEY) and cell coating
Slide2222
SEY of Water: preliminary studiesOnly few layers required;the cell is short (30 cm);laboratory tests to study dynamical equilibrium
ice layer on a-C; test chamber
first in the SPS?
Slide23Summary
Unique physics opportunities for single-spin physics program at LHCFirst conceptual design developedCell30 cm long-cell (openable at injection)≈ 0.3 T vertical fieldCell surface with a-C coating: To be studiedThin ice layer to suppress recombination and depolarization. Target densities and luminosity depend on the gas load permitted: quite high.Tracker downstream requiredBID estimated: more favorable than at HERMES
Slide24Which dissociator technology with extreme reliability to be used?
No coolant must flow into the vacuum systemSpace is tight on the side of the beam foreseen for diagnostics. How would a minimal BRP and TGA look like?Is there a p-p channel we could use for polarimetry?see RHIC jet polarimeter detecting recoil p’s from CNI regionNICA is also planning a similar polarimeterHow to enable assembly, service and repair within the limited space?Open issues
Slide25Spares
Slide2626Proton-proton collisions: variables
XB: Bjorken-x (0<xB<1)- xB = parton momentum fraction- x1 & x
2 Bjorken-x of beam and target
X
F
:
Feymann
-x (-1<
x
F
<1)
Rapidity (y) and angle with beam axis (
q
)
Collider
Fixed target
y
y
y
y
Slide27Along the beam:
About 1m, limited by shielding wall. Could be moved, but important for the PGT to stay as close to the VELO as possible!In transverse direction: Enough to place ABS and diagnostics in the horizontal plane (→ Bguide vertcal)Arrangement in the tunnel:available space upstream of the VELO vessel