PPT-Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process

Author : jade | Published Date : 2023-06-25

By Michael JFischer Nancy A Lynch Michael SPaterson What is Consensus Problem Consensus is the task of getting all processes in a group to agree on some specific

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Impossibility of Distributed Consensus w..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process: Transcript


By Michael JFischer Nancy A Lynch Michael SPaterson What is Consensus Problem Consensus is the task of getting all processes in a group to agree on some specific value based on the votes of each processes . FISCHER Yale University New Haven Connecticut NANCY A LYNCH Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts AND MICHAEL S PATERSON University of Warwick Coventry England Abstract The consensus problem involves an asynchronous system of Dependability. . is the ability to avoid service failures that are more frequent or severe than desired. It is an important goal of distributed systems.. Requirements for dependable systems. Availability. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut NANCY A. LYNCH Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts AND MICHAEL S. PATERSON University of Warwick, Coventry, England Abstract. I Ken Birman. Fall 2012. Consensus… a classic problem. Consensus abstraction underlies many distributed systems and protocols. N processes. They start execution with inputs.  {0,1}. Asynchronous, reliable network. Paxos. --- 1. Steve Ko. Computer Sciences and Engineering. University at Buffalo. Recap. NFS. Caching with write-through policy at close(). Stateless server. One power efficient design: FAWN. Embedded CPUs & Flash . Mutual Exclusion --- 2. & Leader Election --- 1. Steve Ko. Computer Sciences and Engineering. University at Buffalo. 4. . Maekawa’s. Algorithm. Observation: . no need to have all peers reply. Only need to have . Dennis Shasha (following Lynch, Fischer, Patterson). Failure Model. Processes can fail-stop (but that is all; no fail traitorous).. Communication is two-way.. Messages can be dropped or take an arbitrarily long time.. Failure Model. Processes can fail-stop (but that is all; no fail traitorous).. Communication is two-way.. Messages can be dropped or take an arbitrarily long time.. To show: no algorithm can guarantee to solve consensus in the face of fail-stop processes and unlimited message delays.. . Distributed. . Systems. Crash. . Fault. . Tolerance. Sisi. . Duan. Assistant. . Professor. Information. . Systems. sduan@umbc.edu. Outline. A. . brief. . history. . of. . consensus. Paxos. . is the ability to avoid service failures that are more frequent or severe than desired. It is an important goal of distributed systems.. Requirements for dependable systems. Availability. : the probability that the system is available to perform its functions at any moment. Consensus I FLP Impossibility, Paxos COS 418: Distributed Systems Lecture 7 Michael Freedman 2 Recall our 2PC commit problem C  TC: “go!” TC  A, B: “prepare!” A, B  P: “yes” Masivo. de . Datos. Otoño. . 2018. Lecture . 8. NoSQL: Overview. Aidan Hogan. aidhog@gmail.com. Hadoop/MapReduce/Pig/Spark:. Processing Un/Structured Information. Information Retrieval:. Storing Unstructured Information. Byzantine Generals Problem. Solution with signed message. . A . signed message. satisfies all the conditions of oral message, plus . two extra conditions. Signature cannot be forged. Forged message are detected and discarded by loyal generals.. Mohammad . Fattah. 1. , . Antti . Airola. 1. , . Rachata. . Ausavarungnirun. 2. , . Nima. . Mirzaei. 3. ,. Pasi. Liljeberg. 1. , . Juha. . Plosila. 1. , . Siamak. . Mohammadi. 3. , . Tapio. . Pahikkala.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents