/
1 Analysts’ 1 Analysts’

1 Analysts’ - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
373 views
Uploaded On 2015-11-29

1 Analysts’ - PPT Presentation

Incentives and the Dispersion Effect ChuanYang Hwang Yuan Li 2 Puzzle Diether Malloy and Scherbina 2002 A negative crosssectional relationship between dispersion in analysts earnings forecasts and future stock return ID: 208790

analysts

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 Analysts’" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1

Analysts’ Incentives and the Dispersion Effect

Chuan-Yang Hwang

Yuan LiSlide2

2

Puzzle (Diether, Malloy and Scherbina

(2002) )

A negative cross-sectional relationship between dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts and future stock return

(the dispersion

effect).Slide3

3

Explanations in the LiteratureDMS: (Miller 1977) difference of opinion

Johnson (2004): information risk

Sadka

and

Scherbina

(2007

):analyst disagreement and

information asymmetry

Commonalities:

Dispersion is viewed as an exogenous variable

Measure as information uncertainty, cause of lower stock returnSlide4

4

Our explanation: Analysts’ incentive of not fully downward revising their forecasts when they possess bad news would simultaneously increase forecast dispersion and induce an upward bias in consensus forecasts, and stock price.Slide5

5

Analysts’ Incentive to issue optimistic opinionsInvestment banking business (Dugar et al. (1995), Lin and McNichols (1998,2005), Dechow et al. (2000), Michaely and Womack (1999) )Trading Volume ( Cowen et al. (2006) , P.J.Irvine (2001))

Access to managers’ information (Francis and Philbrick (1993), Das, Levine, Sivararnarkrishnan (1998), Lim (2001))

Career Concern ( Hong and Kubik (2003) )Slide6

Incentives are more pervasive among firms have bad yet publicly unknown information:

Non-incentive driven analysts—downward revise forecasts promptlyIncentive driven analysts-reluctant to downward revise--dispersion increase and an upward bias in consensus forecast6Slide7

7

3.0

2.5

2.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

Bad

News

-0.5

3.0

Dispersion Increase

Upward Bias:0.5/3Slide8

8

Supporting Result (1)The dispersion effect exists only among bad news firms.Slide9

Supporting Result (2)

Analysts’ incentive, change in dispersion, and upward bias in consensus forecasts increase with level of dispersion among bad news firms.9Slide10

10

Supporting Result (3) After controlling for incentive-induced upward bias embedded in consensus earnings forecasts, the dispersion

effect disappears.Slide11

11

Supporting Result (4)Firms with low information uncertainty exhibits stronger dispersion effects as high forecast dispersion is more likely

to

be generated by analysts’ incentive.Slide12

12