/
Ryerson University Library and Archives Ryerson University Library and Archives

Ryerson University Library and Archives - PowerPoint Presentation

jideborn
jideborn . @jideborn
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-03

Ryerson University Library and Archives - PPT Presentation

RTA MMP Creative Research Methods Winter 2012 Gaudi Virtual Parking Lot If you should have questions that are either too time consuming theoretical ID: 796656

information journal search index journal information index search research peer web journals cited quality review articles databases scholarly impact

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Ryerson University Library and Archives" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Ryerson University Library and Archives RTA MMP Creative Research Methods Winter 2012 Gaudi

Slide2

Virtual Parking LotIf you should have questions that areeither too time consuming, theoretical or technical in nature to be addressed in this introductory session, then e-mail your question to Jay Wolofsky jwolofsk@ryerson.ca… the answer to your question(s) will be Picasso shared with the group.

Slide3

Session Objectives 1 Introduction/Raison d'être 2 Library ‘Research Styles’ 3 Information Sources I 3.1 RULA Web Page 4 Information Quality I 4.1 Boolean Logic Moore 4.2 Scholarly/Peer-Reviewed Journals 5 Information Sources II 5.1 Journal Databases 5.2 Digital Facilitators 5.3 Deep Web/ Federated Search Engines 5.4 Open Access 6 Information Quality II 6.1 Smart Searching: Cited Reference Searching 6.2 Journal Ranking 7 Clinic

Slide4

Research QuestionsIn what ways does auto-ethnography Braque change the process in media research?What are the practical implications of Postmodern thought on media research?How does social media impact upon or interact with the “tissue of sociality”?

Slide5

Library ‘Research Styles’ BraqueLibrary ‘research styles’ range from ‘traditional’ to ‘informal’Traditional: users need to become familiar with search strategies using specific databases to provide solutions to information- seeking problemsInformal: users enter words into a search box and allow the search engine to do most of the workThe empirical literature shows a definite trend towards the informal style

Slide6

Library Research Spectrum Traditional ………………………… Informal

Slide7

Information Sources I RULA Web Page

Slide8

Boolean Logic 3D Representations of Combination, Intersection and Subtraction

Slide9

Smart Searching Using Boolean Logic This technique was invented by George Boole (1815-1864)Boole’s work ultimately led to the application of binary mathematics to contemporary computer programmingEssentially is a form of linguistic algebra which allows combination, intersection,and subtraction of conceptsCritically important when searching journal databasesQuickly pinpoints relevant informationMinimises information overload

Slide10

Smart Searching Using Boolean Logic Boolean MachineOperatorsAND NOTORWILDC*RD* AND TRUNATIO*NESTING

Slide11

Scholarly Journals Van GoghDistinguishing Scholarly Journals

Slide12

Peer-ReviewPeer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly ms to the scrutiny of experts in the same field prior to publication in a journalSingle-blind peer review (norm) where the author’s identity is known to the reviewers, but for the reviewers’ Gaudiidentity to be hidden from the author (blinding allows free comment without fear of repercussions)Double-blind (most effective) peer review where the identities or the author and reviewers are hidden from each other, assuming that if the reviewers do not know the author or their institution, then they will focus on content, unaffected by conscious or even unconscious biasOpen peer review author’s and reviewers’ identities are knownto each other and optionally published ensuring transparency,i.e. higher quality reviewsPost publication (supplemental open peer review variant) where all readers are able to reviewand rate the ms on a numerical scale

Slide13

Research DatabasesTraditionalNeed to knowWhich are themost relevantSyntaxStructure of the thesaurusLimits Modigliani

Slide14

Digital Facilitators Informal Kandinsky Digital facilitators assist publishers in digitising their publications for the Internet Provide content management and end-user access for e-content from the world's leading publishers Host digital journal editions, conference proceedings and books HighWire Press, MetaPress, Scholar's Portal Journals

Slide15

The Deep Web The Deep Web is the set of web-sites and their documents that cannot be accessed via standard crawler-type search engines, e.g. Google or Safari since each source has a unique method of access The Deep Web contains high quality information found in more specialised or remote corners of the Internet, e.g. journal databases

Slide16

Federated Search Engines Informal Federated search engines execute simultaneous real time search of the Deep Web using sophisticated software “connectors”

The results are collated and presented back to the user in a unified format

Slide17

Federated Search Engines Informal Dali One type, a ‘web spider variant’ crawls information from from as many databases as possible creating a giant uniform index, e.g. Google Scholar A more advanced type searches across each database’s own indexing AND crawls information, e.g., Biznar, Mednar, DeepDyve

Slide18

Federated Search EnginesThere are 3 general types: The first type searches across each database using its own indexing DaliThe second type ‘web spider’ crawls information from as many databases as possible creating a giant uniform index, e.g. Google Scholar, OpenDOARThe third type searches across each database’s own indexing AND crawls information, e.g. Biznar, Mednar, DeepDyve …

Slide19

Open AccessInformal GauginAlternative to the current scholarly publishing modelDigital information is made freely availableUsers may have a variety of permissions, including the right to copy, use, change, distribute or display the information, as long as the original author are citedDigital Commons@Ryerson, T-Space, OpenDOAR

Slide20

Cited Reference Searching Cited Reference Network Visualisation

Slide21

Cited Reference SearchingWho has cited (referred to) previously published works Find more recent articles which update earlier researchFind responses to an articleSee how influential an article or book has beenIdentify articles on the same topic as the original work

Slide22

Cited Reference SearchingResearch databases that provide links to citing sources EscherAcademic Search PremierGoogle ScholarIEEE ScopusWeb of Science

Slide23

Journal Ranking: A Very Brief OverviewEigenfactor Network Visualisation

Slide24

Raison d'être Widely used in academia for the evaluation of journal’s quality Indicator of the status of a journal within its field Relative difficulty of being published in that journal and the associated prestige Consistent high-quality work which defines

their field

Modigliani

Lower ranked journals,

although peer-reviewed

,

may have a higher acceptance rate and contribute

less to their field as a whole

Slide25

Scaffolding JR is a sub-set of bibliometrics (biblio: books, information; metric: measure) which is a sub-discipline of information science Pareto Principle (Vilfredo Pareto, 1848-1923) “80/20” rule 20% of journals account for 80% of use Zipf’s Law (George Kingsley Zipf, 1902-1950) disproportionate distributions of use popularity Lotka’s Law/Long Tail (Alfred James Lotka, 1880-1949) most authors contribute few articles Modigliani Bradford’s Law (Samuel C. Bradford, 1878-1948) similar to Pareto’s, Zipf’s and Lotka’s distributions

Slide26

Journals may be grouped into a core of relevance and successive rings of lesser relevance for any subject or disciplineDaliSimply put: A small number of core journals have the greatest concentration of relevant articles

Slide27

Qualitative Journal Ranking Using expert opinion Lipchitz

Slide28

Qualitative Journal RankingTier A World-wide distribution and readershipVirtually all papers are of a very high qualityContributions are scientifically and methodologicallymost fastidious and innovativeAcceptance rates are typically very lowHigh competition Bacon Stringent criteria used for selection of editorial board Double blind peer review process

Slide29

Qualitative Jounal Ranking Tier B  Supraregional distributionContributions are scientificaly and methodologically sound BraqueSubmissions from a supraregional realm BraqueFrequently important outlets for the work of PhD students and early career researchers  Relatively high acceptance rates Criteria used for selection of editorial boardUsually single blind peer reviewed process  

Slide30

Qualitative Journal RankingTier CMinimally national distributionPractitioners rank amongst the core target groupLess stringent criteria used for selection of editorial boardUsually single blind peer review process Picasso

Slide31

Quantitative Journal RankingVan Gogh

Slide32

Citation MetricsStatistics gathered on the number of times a journal article has been cited by other journal articles BaconUsed to assess the quality of a journalThe assumption is that if a journal is frequently cited, then it must be publishing important, high quality or ground breaking research

Slide33

Citation MetricsSelected MethodsAge-Weighted (AWCR, AWCRpa, AW)AR-indexEgghe’s g-IndexEigenfactorEssential Science Indicators (ESI)Hirsch’s h-Index Contemporary h-Index e-index Egghe’s g-Index Generalised h-index Individual h-Index hl-index, hl-norm, hm-index

Humanities Journal Rankings (ESF)

JCR Impact Factor

Journal

Ranking.com

(Red Jasper)

Publish or Perish

SciMago

Dali

Science Gateway

Source

Normalised

Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Zhang’s E-Index

Slide34

Journal Impact Factor MooreSeeks to measure the influence a journal has in its fieldMore specifically, it measures how often scholars and researchers have cited articles in a particularjournal in the most recent 2 (or 5) yearsSimply put, the higher the number, the better the journal's impact factorThe better the journal's impact factor, the more influence it is presumed to have in its field

Slide35

Eigenfactor Moore Scholarly literature forms a vast network of academic papers connected to one another by citations in bibliographies and footnotes The structure of this network reflects millions of decisions by individual researchers and scholars about which papers are important and relevant to their own work Within the structure of this network is a wealth of information about the relative influence of individual journals, and also about the patterns of relations among academic disciplines

Slide36

Eigenfactor GaudiThe Eigenfactor™ algorithm corresponds to research model in which researchers follow chains of citations as they move from journal to journalA researcher selects a journal article at random and after reading the article, randomly selects a citation from that article, and reads it … n!