/
Chapter 3 Chapter 3

Chapter 3 - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
382 views
Uploaded On 2015-11-22

Chapter 3 - PPT Presentation

Introduction to Adjudications Every new tribunal erected for the decision of facts without the intervention of jury    is a step towards establishing    the most oppressive of absolute governments ID: 202212

formal adjudications policy agency adjudications formal agency policy apa set law trials courts adjudication process corps rulemaking agencies rules

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chapter 3" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Chapter 3Introduction to Adjudications

Every new tribunal, erected for the decision of facts, without the intervention of jury, . . . is a step towards establishing . . . the most oppressive of absolute governments. Slide2

2

Adjudications in the Old Days

What did "jury of your peers" mean originally?

How has that changed?

Government regulation

Did you get a hearing when the King told you what to do?

Was there a right to a jury in civil trials?Slide3

3

Defining an Adjudication

Adjudications are the process used to make an order involving specific identified parties

What are examples of adjudications?

Why is your federal student loan application an adjudication?

What is the order?

What about social security disability determinations? (more later on due process)

These are examples of adjudications to find facts and apply law in individual casesSlide4

4

Adjudications to Make Policy

Are courts charged with making law and policy through legal opinions?

Do their opinions make law and policy?

What is happening with gay marriage?

Are civil law courts bound by precedent?

Why do we read civil court opinions?

How do they set law and policy?

Agency adjudications can work the same waySlide5

5

Adjudications to Set Policy - California Dental Association

What did the FTC accuse the CDA of?

What was the sequence of the agency review?

Why are agency rulings appealed to the Circuit courts rather than district courts?

How does this adjudication set national policy, if the adjudication is not precedent?

Who will be deciding future cases?Slide6

6

Why Make Policy Through Adjudications?

Why don't legislatures write laws that are specific enough that courts have no room to set policy?

When might a legislature intentionally write an ambiguous law, knowing it will have to be resolved by a court or an agency?

Agencies face the same issues

While they can make rules, as we will see, that can be slow and cumbersome, while adjudications can be fastSlide7

7

Wetlands Example

Wetlands development requires a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers

The developer must submit proof that the land to be developed is not a wetland, or, if it is, that there will be appropriate mitigation

The Corps evaluates the application and makes a decision, which can then be appealed to an internal Corps appeals board

If the application meets the standards, the Corps will issue a permit.

In the absence of regulations, the decision reflects the Corps' policy on how it defines and regulates wetlandsSlide8

8

Inspections as Adjudications

Restaurants need a food handling permit to sell to prepare food and sell it to the public

Must show that you have the proper equipment

Must show proper training for employees

These permits provide for surprise inspections to assure that the conditions are still being met

The inspector views the facts

The owner can provide input during the inspection

The inspector provides written findingsSlide9

9

Basic Procedure for Adjudications:

Section 555

Federal Administrative Procedure Act

Section 555 applies to all adjudications

Right to bring your own lawyer

No right to appointed counsel

Right to a record

Right to notice of the findings and reasonsSlide10

10

Louisiana APA

Louisiana Provisions

LA - 955, et seq.Slide11

11

Who Gets to Appear Before the Agency?

What are the problems if interested persons who are not parties are allowed to intervene?

What is the problem if they are not allowed?

What about nuclear power plant licensing?

Who is interested?

How about permitting landfills?Slide12

12

APA Provisions - Formal Adjudications

Formal (APA) Adjudications under the US APA

US - 554, et seq.Slide13

13

Formal (APA) v. Informal (Non-APA) Adjudications

What is the language in 554 that triggers a formal adjudication?

"on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing“

Remember formal rulemaking?

What are the subsequent provisions this triggers?

556

,

557

Why do we call informal adjudications non-APA adjudications?Slide14

14

Formal Adjudications in the Real World

Formal adjudications, triggered by 554 and conducted under 556 and 557, look like trials.

Most are like simple trials.

Since they can have multiple parties with the right to present evidence and cross examine, they can be very long and complex.

Not as bad as formal rulemaking.Slide15

Informal (Non-APA) Adjudications

The procedure for informal adjudications are determined by the legislature as part of the enabling law or left to the agency.

These range from complex trials to inspections and other very simple proceduresMost are simple proceedings that do not resemble trialsSome are very like trials, it just depends on the legislation and agency regulations15Slide16

16

Administrative Cost and Formal Adjudications

Administrative cost is a key concept in adlaw

Administrative agencies carry out huge numbers of adjudications

What would it cost if Medicare payment determination looked like a trial?

What sort of delays would you expect?

What if FEMA used trials to decide on compensation checks?

This is revisited next chapter in the tension between due process and agency costsSlide17

17

Practice Issues

The book spends a lot of time on examples of arguments for and against the court ordering a formal adjudication.

You do not need this level of detail for this course

As with formal rulemaking, the courts are reticent to order formal rulemaking unless the statute is clear.

If the statute is ambiguous, most circuits defer to the agency –

Chevron

deference.

A few do not defer, reading the law themselves.

In practice, if the issue has not been settled for your hearing type, you have to argue the issue to the court based on the circuit’s precedent.

Louisiana thinks adjudications are trials.Slide18

18

Practical Considerations in Adjudications

Except for the APA provision for formal adjudications, the agencies can set their own procedures for adjudications, or congress can set them in the enabling act

Some agencies have developed rules based on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence, which make their hearings look like trials.

As we will discuss later, even if the proceeding looks like a trial, the ALJ's power is much more limited than that of an Article III judge.Slide19

19

The Nature of the Agency and Formality of the Process

The broader the reach of the agency actions and the more controversial the agency function, the more formal the agency process

Social Security Disability ALJs deal with individuals and their decisions do not set policy.

National Labor Relations Board adjudications set policy for unionization for whole industries

It usually does not use rules for these questions, so adjudications are even more important