/
Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, Robert C Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, Robert C

Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, Robert C - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
416 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-21

Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, Robert C - PPT Presentation

41 Ratio of Understanding Users papers to Systems Tools Architectures and Infrastructure papers submitted to the Interaction Beyond the Individual track at CHI 2011 Trouble Exponential Growth ID: 413914

chi social 2007 system social chi system 2007 interaction technical builders ackerman sociotechnical interesting metareviewer data sampling paraphrased spread

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, Robert C. MillerSlide2

4:1

Ratio of “Understanding Users” papers

to “Systems, Tools, Architectures and Infrastructure” papers

submitted to the Interaction Beyond the Individual track

at CHI 2011.Slide3

Trouble: Exponential Growth

Your usage

data is not really compelling

because only a

small fraction of Facebook

is

using the application.

Worse

, your numbers

aren’t growing in anything like an exponential fashion.

– CHI

metareviewer

,

paraphrasedSlide4

Suggestion: Exponential Growth

Separate evaluation

of

spread

from

steady-state

.

Which claim is the paper making?Slide5

Trouble: Snowball Sampling

The authors’ choice of study method – snowball sampling their system by advertising within their own social network – potentially leads to serious problems with validity.

– CHI

metareviewer

,

paraphrasedSlide6

Suggestion: Snowball Sampling

Snowballing is

inevitable

in social systems. It is fundamental to how they operate.Slide7
Slide8

Novelty

Between a Rock and a Hard ScienceSlide9

sociotechnicalSlide10

socio

technical

studiers

buildersSlide11

socio

technical

studiers

builders

Fatal Flaw Fallacy

[Olsen]

Ecological validity at the cost of internal validity

[Ackerman 2000], [

Barkhuus

and Rode 2007], [Chi 2009], [Greenberg and Buxton 2008], [Kaye and

Sengers

2007], [

Landay

2009]

, [Lieberman 2003

], [Olsen 2007], [

Zhai

2003]Slide12

socio

technical

studiers

builders

Show us elegant complexity.

(simple ideas that enable complex scenarios)

That’s it? What is possible now that wasn’t before?

Nothing — but focus on emergent social activity.

Can you add

multitouch

?

Not using IE8.

We let people type messages up to 140 characters.Slide13

socio

technical

studiers

builders

Build a technically interesting system

(that is hard to spread or evaluate), or

Simplify to a system with socially interesting outcomes

(that builders find less novel).Slide14

Build a technically interesting system

(that is hard to spread or evaluate), or

Simplify to a system with socially interesting outcomes

(that builders find less novel).

The contribution needs to take one strong stance or another. Either it describes a novel system or a novel social

interaction. If it’s a system, then I question the novelty. If it’s a social interaction, it needs more development.

– CHI

metareviewer

, paraphrasedSlide15

Create a shared understandingof research contributionsSlide16

social

technical

New forms of social interaction

Shared organizational memory [Ackerman 1994]

Designs that impact social interactions

Increasing online contribution [

Beenen et al. 2004]Enable fluent social interaction in a new domain Socially translucent systems [Erickson and Kellogg 2000]Slide17

social

technical

Designs collecting or powered by social data

Wikidashboard

[

Suh

et al. 2008]; sense.us [Heer et al. 2007]Algorithms to coordinate crowds or derive signal from social data

Collaborative Filtering [

Resnick

et al. 1994]; Iterate-and-Vote [Little et al. 2010]

Platforms and infrastructures

TurKit

[Little et al. 2010]Slide18

social

technical

Paired contributions can increase each others’ value

×

ManyEyes

[

Viégas

et al. 2007]Slide19

In

c

onclusion

introduction:

What are our millennium challenges?

What is our relationship with industry

and walled gardens?

How can (and should) we evolve

our standards of proof?Slide20

Michael S. Bernstein, Mark S. Ackerman, Ed H. Chi, Robert C. MillerSlide21