Nature & Origin of Crime - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Nature & Origin of Crime

MIAN ALI HAIDER

L.L.B., L.L.M(

Cum Laude

) (UK)

Slide2

It is criminal to steal a purse,

It is daring to steal a fortune.

It is a mark of greatness to steal a crown.The blame diminishes as the guilt increases.

Johann

Schiller (1759-1805

)

We sow an act and reap a habit:

We sow a habit and reap a character:

We sow a character and reap a destiny.

William

Black (1893)Slide3
Slide4

Crime can be defined…

Form of normal behavior

Violation of behavioral normsForm of deviant behavior

Legally defined behavior

Violation of human rights

Social harm/injury

Form of inequality

Social, Legal, and Moral dimensions involved Slide5

Emile Durkheim (1893)

Made three specific claims about the nature of crime:

Crime is normal

Crime is inevitable

Crime is usefulSlide6

Crime is normal

As normal as birth and marriage

Crimes occur in all societiesThey are closely tied to the facts of collective life

Crime rates tend to increase as societies evolve from lower to higher phasesSlide7

Crime is normal

In societies with mechanical solidarity punishment was more severe

Criminal act offends the strong, well-defined common consciousness

A crime against another person=crime against the entire society

Rejection was the most terrible punishmentSlide8

Crime is inevitable

No society can ever be entirely

rid of crime

Imagine a community of saints in a perfect and exemplary monastery

Faults that appear venial to the ordinary person will arouse the same scandal as does normal crime

Absolute conformity to rules is impossible

Each member is society faces variation in background, education, heredity, social influencesSlide9

Crime is useful

Crime is indispensable to the

normal evolution of law and morality

Crime often is a symptom of individual

originality

and a preparation for changes in society

Rosa Parks (was a criminal) is a hero now

Her simple act of protest galvanized America's civil rights revolutionSlide10

What is crime?

Crime can be defined in a variety ways

At least four definitional perspectives

Legalistic

Political

Sociological

Psychological Slide11

Crime as legally defined behavior

Rooted in the criminal law (without law there can be no crime

The most precise

definition

The

narrowest

definition

Classic definition of crime is often quoted from Paul Tappan’s writings “crime is an intentional act in violation of the criminal law committed without defense or excuse, and penalized by the state as a felony” (1947)Slide12

Legalistic definition

Crime

is human conduct in violation of the criminal laws of state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction that has the power to make such laws

Is anything wrong with this definition?

Moral definitions of crime suggests that a lot

more victimization

and

injury occurring than is accounted for by the legal order.Slide13

Political view of crime

Powerful groups of people label selected undesirable forms of behavior as illegal

Powerful individuals use their power to establish laws and sanctions against less powerful persons and groups

Official statistics indicate that crime rates in inner-city, high-poverty areas are higher than those in suburban areas

Self-reports of prison inmates show that prisoners are members of the lower classSlide14

Political perspective

Crime of inequality includes a lot of behaviors that are omitted by legalistic definition

Crime is a political concept used to protect powerful people Crimes of power (price fixing, economic crimes, unsafe working conditions, nuclear waste products, war-making, domestic violence, etc)Slide15

Sociological perspective

A more comprehensive sociological definition of crime was offered by Julia and Herman Schwendinger (1975)

“Crime encompasses any harmful acts, including violations of fundamental prerequisites for well-being (such as food, shelter, clothing, medical service, challenging work and recreational experiences, as well as security from predatory individuals or repressive and imperialistic elites” Slide16

Sociological perspective

Schwendingers have challenged criminologists to be less constrained in what they see as a crime

Violation of human rights

When a man who steals a paltry sum can be called a criminal while agents of the State can legally reward men who destroy food so that price level can be maintained while a sizable portion of population suffers from maltinutritionSlide17

Psychological perspective (moralistic view)

Any behavior which stands in the way of an individuals developing to his/her fullest potential would be considered crime

If criminologists adopted this view of crime, the scope of criminology would be greatly expanded..Slide18

Introduction to Criminological Theory

Several

theories

attempt to explain criminal behavior. Some theories assume:

Crime is part of human nature.

Crime is based on biological, psychological, sociological, and/or economic aspects.Slide19

Classical Theory

One of the earliest approaches to explaining the causes of crime was

classical theory

.

In

1764, criminologist

Cesare

Beccaria

wrote

An Essay on Crimes and Punishments

, which set forth classical criminological theory.

He argued that the only justified rationale for laws and punishments was the principle of

utility

.Slide20

utility

The principle that a policy should provide “the greatest happiness shared by the greatest number.”Slide21

Classical Theory

Beccaria believed the basis of society, as well as the origin of punishments and the right to punish, is the

social contract

.

The only legitimate purpose of punishment is

special deterrence

and

general deterrence

.Slide22

classical theory

A product of the Enlightenment, based on the assumption that people exercise free will and are thus completely responsible for their actions. In classical theory, human behavior, including criminal behavior, is motivated by a hedonistic rationality, in which actors weigh the potential pleasure of an action against the possible pain associated with it

.Slide23

special deterrence

The prevention of individuals from committing crime again by punishing them.

social contract

An imaginary agreement to sacrifice the minimum amount of liberty to prevent anarchy and chaos.

continued…Slide24

general deterrence

The prevention of people in general or society at large from engaging in crime by punishing specific individuals and making examples of them.Slide25

Neoclassical Theory

Classical theory was difficult to apply in practice. It was modified in the early 1800s and became known as

neoclassical theory

.Slide26

neoclassical theory

A modification of classical theory in which it was conceded that certain factors, such as insanity, might inhibit the exercise of free will.Slide27

Neoclassical Theory

Neoclassical theory introduced the idea of:

Premeditation as a measure of the degree of free will.

Mitigating circumstances as legitimate grounds for diminished responsibility.Slide28

Neoclassical Theory

Classical and neoclassical theory are the basis of the criminal justice system in the United States.Slide29

Positivist Approaches to Explaining Crime

The theory of the positivist school of criminology grew out of positive philosophy and the logic and methodology of experimental science. Slide30

The Positivist School of Thought

The key assumptions of the positivist school of thought were:

Human behavior is determined and not a matter of free will.

Criminals are fundamentally different from

noncriminals

.

Social scientists can be objective in their work.

Crime is frequently caused by multiple factors.Slide31

Biological Theories

Biological theories of crime causation (biological positivism) are based on the belief that criminals are physiologically different from

noncriminals

. The cause of crime is

biological inferiority

.Slide32

biological inferiority

According to biological theories, a criminal’s innate physiological makeup produces certain physical or genetic characteristics that distinguish criminals from noncriminals.Slide33

Heredity Studies

Several studies have attempted to determine if criminality is hereditary by studying:

All of these methods fail to prove that criminality is hereditary, because they cannot separate hereditary influences from environmental influences.

family trees

statistics

identical and fraternal twins

adopted childrenSlide34

Modern

Biocriminology

Ongoing research has revealed numerous biological factors associated either directly or indirectly with criminal or delinquent behavior:

chemical, mineral, and vitamin deficiencies in the diet

diets high in sugar and carbohydrates

hypoglycemia

continued…Slide35

Modern Biocriminology

ingestion of food dyes and lead

exposure to radiation

brain dysfunctionsSlide36

Positivist Approaches

Today, most criminologists believe that criminal behavior is the product of a complex interaction between biology and environmental or social conditions.Slide37

Positivist Approaches

Biology or genetics gives an individual a predisposition to behave in a certain way.

Whether a person actually behaves in that way and whether that behavior is defined as a crime depend on environmental or social conditions.Slide38

Psychological Theories

There are many theories regarding psychological causes of crime, including:

Intelligence and

crime

Psychoanalytic theoriesSlide39

Intelligence and Crime

The idea that crime is the product primarily of people of low intelligence has been popular occasionally in the United States.

A study in 1931 showed no correlation between intelligence and criminality.Slide40

Psychoanalytic Theories

Psychoanalytic theories of crime causation are associated with the work of Sigmund Freud who believed that people who had unresolved deep-seated problems were

psychopaths

.Slide41

psychopaths

Persons characterized by no sense of guilt, no subjective conscience, and no sense of right and wrong. They have difficulty in forming relationships with other people; they cannot empathize with other people. They are also called sociopaths or antisocial personalities.Slide42

Sociological Theories

Sociologists emphasize that human beings live in social groups and that those groups and the social structure they create influence behavior.

Most sociological theories of crime causation assume that a criminal’s behavior is determined by his or her social environment and reject the notion of the born criminal.Slide43

The Theory of the

Chicago School

In the 1920s, a group of sociologists known as the

Chicago School

attempted to uncover the relationship between a neighborhood’s crime rate and the characteristics of the neighborhood.Slide44

The Theory of the

Chicago School

Studies found that neighborhoods that experienced high delinquency rates also experienced

social disorganization

.Slide45

social disorganization

The condition in which the usual controls over delinquents are largely absent, delinquent behavior is often approved of by parents and neighbors, there are many opportunities for delinquent behavior, and there is little encouragement, training, or opportunity for legitimate employment.Slide46

Anomie or Strain Theory

Robert Merton in 1938 wrote about a major contradiction in the U.S. between cultural goals and social structure. He called the contradiction

anomie

.Slide47

anomie

For Merton, the contradiction between the cultural goal of achieving wealth and the social structure’s inability to provide legitimate institutional means for achieving the goal. Slide48

Anomie or Strain Theory

Merton argued that the limited availability of legitimate institutionalized means to wealth puts a strain on people. People adapt through:

Conformity—playing the game.

Innovation—pursuing wealth by illegitimate means.

continued…Slide49

Anomie or Strain Theory

Ritualism—not actively pursuing wealth.

Retreatism—dropping out.

Rebellion—rejecting the goal of wealth and the institutional means of getting it.Slide50

Learning Theories

Edwin H. Sutherland—in his theory of

differential association

—was the first 20th-century criminologist to argue that criminal behavior was learned.

This theory, modified, remains one of the most influential theories of crime causation.Slide51

differential association

Sutherland’s theory that persons who become criminal do so because of contacts with criminal patterns and isolation from anticriminal patterns.Slide52

Learning Theories

Among the policy implications of learning theory is to punish criminal behavior effectively, according to learning theory principles. This is not done effectively in the U.S.

Probation does not function as an aversive stimulus.

Most offenders are not incarcerated.

continued…Slide53

Learning Theories

Punishment is not consistent and immediate.

Offenders are generally returned to the environments in which their crimes were committed.

There is no positive reinforcement of alternative, prosocial behaviors.Slide54

Social Control Theories

The key question in the

social control theory

is not why people commit crime and delinquency, but rather why don’t they? Why do people conform?Slide55

Social Control Theories

The most detailed elaboration of modern social control theory is attributed to Travis Hirschi who wrote the 1969 book,

Causes of Delinquency

.Slide56

Social Control Theories

Hirschi argued that delinquency should be expected if a juvenile is not properly socialized by establishing a strong bond to society, consisting of:

Attachment to others

Commitment to conventional lines of action

Involvement in conventional activities

Belief in the moral order and lawSlide57

Social Control Theories

More recently, Hirschi wrote with Michael Gottfredson that the principal cause of deviant behaviors is ineffective child rearing, which produces people with low self-control.Slide58

Critical Approaches to

Explaining Crime

Critical theories grew out of the changing social landscape of the American 1960s.

Critical theories assume that human beings are the creators of institutions and structures that ultimately dominate and constrain them.

Critical theories assume that society is characterized primarily by conflict over moral values.Slide59

Labeling Theory

The focus of

labeling theory

is the

criminalization process

rather than the positivist concern with the peculiarities of the criminal.Slide60

criminalization process

The way people and actions are defined as criminal.

labeling theory

A theory that emphasizes the criminalization process as the cause of some crime.Slide61

Labeling Theory

The labeling theory argues that once a person commits a first criminal act and gets processed in the system, they are labeled negatively as a criminal.

The label becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.Slide62

Conflict Theory

Conflict theory

focuses on the conflict in society between rich and poor, management and labor, whites and minorities.Slide63

conflict theory

A theory that assumes that society is based primarily on conflict between competing interest groups and that criminal law and the criminal justice system are used to control subordinate groups. Crime is caused by relative powerlessness.Slide64

Radical Theory

Radical theories

argue that capitalism requires people to compete against each other in the pursuit of material wealth.

The more unevenly wealth is distributed, the more likely people are to find persons weaker than themselves that they can take advantage of in their pursuit of wealth.Slide65

radical theories

Theories of crime causation that are generally based on a Marxist theory of class struggle.Slide66
Slide67