Janet Jamieson Loïc Wacquants Punishing the Poor Thesis There is a new institutional machinery for managing poverty wherein the invisible hand of the market and the iron fist of the state combine and complement each other 2001 404 ID: 614480
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Criminalisation of Social Policy?" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Criminalisation of Social Policy?
Janet JamiesonSlide2
Loïc Wacquant’s
Punishing the Poor Thesis
There is a “new institutional machinery for managing poverty” wherein “the invisible hand of the market and the iron fist of the state combine and complement each other” (2001: 404)‘Workfare’ and ‘prisonfare’ a response to the problems of the neoliberal state in post-modernity Wacquant observes that within the European context England has often served as the ‘Trojan horse’ and the ‘acclimation chamber’ (2001: 405) for a US inspired ‘penalisaton of poverty’ (ibid.: 401)Loïc Wacquant – lecture on the penal state available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoumuRRwOqYSlide3
The Special Case of Anti-Social Behaviour
Boundary blurring:
Ambiguity of ASB definition
Reliance on civil as opposed to criminal lawMulti-agency endeavour.Displacement of goals:Loss of the social in favour of social order and crime control objectives (Rodger, 2008).Slide4
Lessons and Dangers
Displacement
Undermining civil rights of young people;
Disproportionate to actMeaningless or unenforceableTargeted on vulnerable groups(In)Justice by geographyNetwideningAlienating and exclusionaryPromote intoleranceCriminalisation of social policySlide5
Dispersal Powers in Merseyside
I didn’t know anything of the restriction till that moment so… and then after it I was like “well that was wrong, we weren’t in the wrong, the police were in the wrong for that, we didn’t do nothing”. I could understand if I had drugs on me or weapons but we didn’t. I was quite peed off to be honest.
I really care because I know it’s not alright especially when we’re not even doing anything wrong [...] So why should we care? Why should we care anyway yeah? Because who are they to tell us where we can and can’t go? Bang out of order. and the woman, oh my god I thought she was going to hit me. She was just so nasty and you know I mean my mates, we’ve never ever took drugs, we’ve never done anything wrong. All we were doing was singing you know that’s not an offence, alright yeah we were walking down, it was X Avenue and that’s got the one with is it a Section Thirty and she just bollocked us but she was so nasty.Slide6
Enter the Coalition Government
Big Society
Spending Review
Green Paper on ASB Criminal Behaviour OrdersCrime Prevention InjunctionsCommunity Protection Notice (levels 1 &2)Police Direction PowersCommunity TriggerSlide7
Riots 2011
PM describes the
August riots as a ‘wake up call for the country’ which will necessitate a ‘security
fightback’ of increased police presence on the streets and a ‘social fightback’ to improve parenting and get ‘families back on track’ (Cameron, 2011). “These riots were not about poverty” (Cameron, 2011)The Riots, Communities and Victims Panel (2012) “a lack of opportunities for young people, poor parenting, a failure of the justice system to rehabilitate offenders, materialism and suspicion of the police”Slide8
Discussion
What is the place of ASB measures in contemporary Youth Justice?
Is a criminalisation of social policy evident in contemporary youth justice policy and practice?
Is the contemporary policy preoccupation with ‘troubled families’ fit for purpose?Can the youth justice system help to give young people a ‘stake in society’?